Weltmeister W6: which version to buy (AT 66.2 kWh vs AT 83 kWh)
If the choice is a Weltmeister W6, it is not a choice of generation and not a choice of engine output. WM Motors lists one generation from 2022-04-01 (stop not measured) as an SUV 5-doors with two versions: AT 66.2 kWh and AT 83 kWh. Both use Electro fuel, 218 hp (160 kW), 315 Nm, Automatic with 1 gear, FWD, and a 175 km/h top speed.
If the choice is a Weltmeister W6, it is not a choice of generation and not a choice of engine output. WM Motors lists one generation from 2022-04-01 (stop not measured) as an SUV 5-doors with two versions: AT 66.2 kWh and AT 83 kWh. Both use Electro fuel, 218 hp (160 kW), 315 Nm, Automatic with 1 gear, FWD, and a 175 km/h top speed. The numbers that actually split the pair are battery size (66.2 kWh vs 83 kWh) and 0–100 km/h (7.9 s vs 8.8 s). Buy AT 66.2 kWh if the 0.9 s quicker sprint matters more than pack size. Buy AT 83 kWh if the extra 16.8 kWh of battery is the point of the order.
Specs that decide the purchase
The two Weltmeister W6 versions share the driveline and split on pack and acceleration:
| Version | hp | kW | Nm | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Gears | Drive | 0–100 km/h | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT 66.2 kWh | 218 | 160 | 315 | not measured | Electro | not measured | not measured | not measured | Automatic | 1 | FWD | 7.9 s | 175 km/h |
| AT 83 kWh | 218 | 160 | 315 | not measured | Electro | not measured | not measured | not measured | Automatic | 1 | FWD | 8.8 s | 175 km/h |
Displacement, cylinders, layout, and boost are not measured on either version. There is no second generation to “step up to”: pokoleniy is 1, and both modifications start 2022-04-01 with stop not measured.
Engine, power, and what the extra battery does not buy
AT 66.2 kWh and AT 83 kWh are the same motor on paper: 218 hp, 160 kW, 315 Nm. The kW-to-hp ratio is 160 / 218 ≈ 0.73 kW per hp on both. Torque is identical, so there is no extra Newton-metre for choosing the larger pack.
What the larger version does buy is capacity: 83 − 66.2 = 16.8 kWh, which is 16.8 / 66.2 ≈ 25.4% more energy stored than AT 66.2 kWh. What it does not buy is more power: horsepower stays 218, kilowatts stay 160, torque stays 315 Nm, gearbox stays Automatic 1, drive stays FWD, top speed stays 175 km/h.
Power per litre cannot be calculated: displacement is not measured on both Electro versions. Weight per horsepower cannot be calculated: kerb mass and gross mass are not measured on both. Those missing figures are the main reason this comparison has to rest on pack size and 0–100, not on power-to-weight.
Performance: 0–100, top speed, mpg
AT 66.2 kWh reaches 100 km/h in 7.9 s. AT 83 kWh reaches 100 km/h in 8.8 s. The larger pack is 8.8 − 7.9 = 0.9 s slower, or 0.9 / 7.9 ≈ 11.4% longer to 100 km/h, at the same 218 hp and 315 Nm.
Top speed does not change with the pack: both are 175 km/h. There is no “faster highway version” in this catalogue pair.
Fuel consumption city, highway, and combined is not measured on AT 66.2 kWh and not measured on AT 83 kWh. mpg is therefore not measured. CO2 is 0 on both. Eco class is not measured on both. Tank volume is not measured — expected on Electro, and still recorded as not measured so it is not read as “there is no such parameter.”
If the buying question is “which is quicker,” the data answer is AT 66.2 kWh by 0.9 s to 100 km/h. If the buying question is “which stores more energy,” the data answer is AT 83 kWh by 16.8 kWh. Those two answers point at opposite versions.
Dimensions, ground clearance, wheels, chassis
Ground clearance is 170 mm on AT 66.2 kWh and 170 mm on AT 83 kWh. The extra battery does not change listed clearance.
Wheel sizes are the same list on both: 215/60 R17 and 225/55 R18. There is no 17-inch-only version and no 18-inch-only version in the data.
Front suspension is Independent, spring on both. Rear suspension is Independent, spring on both. Front brakes are Ventilated disc on both. Rear brakes are Disc on both. Chassis spec does not separate the two trims.
Kerb weight is not measured. Gross weight is not measured. Tank is not measured. Without mass, you cannot say how many kilograms the 16.8 kWh extra pack adds, and you cannot compute kg per hp. The slower 8.8 s time on AT 83 kWh versus 7.9 s on AT 66.2 kWh at identical 218 hp is the only performance number that moves with pack size.
Generations: there is nothing later to wait for in this data
WM Motors Weltmeister W6 has 1 generation (1 generation), body SUV 5-doors, 2 modifications, start 2022-04-01, stop not measured. There is no restyling listed as a separate generation. There is no second-generation power bump, no AWD variant, and no Automatic with more than 1 gear.
So “which generation to buy” collapses to “this generation,” and “what the extra money buys” cannot be priced here — prices are not in the data. The extra you can count is 16.8 kWh of battery on AT 83 kWh, paid for with 0.9 s extra to 100 km/h versus AT 66.2 kWh.
Reliability, problems, and what this catalogue does not measure
Problems, reliability, and known faults are not in the launch data. Range, charging time, and consumption are not measured. Do not treat those blanks as “no issues” or “no consumption.” They are not measured.
What is measured and shared: Electro, 218 hp, 160 kW, 315 Nm, Automatic 1, FWD, 175 km/h, 170 mm clearance, CO2 0, the same two wheel sizes, the same Independent, spring suspension, Ventilated disc front, Disc rear.
Which version to choose
Choose AT 66.2 kWh when the 7.9 s 0–100 is the deciding spec. It is the quicker Weltmeister W6 in this pair: 0.9 s faster than AT 83 kWh, same 218 hp, same 315 Nm, same 175 km/h, same FWD Automatic 1, same 170 mm clearance. You give up 16.8 kWh of pack versus AT 83 kWh (about 25.4% less capacity).
Choose AT 83 kWh when pack size is the deciding spec. It stores 83 kWh versus 66.2 kWh. You keep 218 hp, 160 kW, 315 Nm, Automatic 1, FWD, 175 km/h, 170 mm, and the same wheels. You accept 8.8 s to 100 km/h instead of 7.9 s.
Do not choose between them on power, drive, gearbox, top speed, clearance, or wheels. Those fields match. Do not choose on mpg, kerb weight, gross weight, tank, cylinders, layout, boost, or displacement — all not measured on both. Do not wait for a later generation in this dataset — there is one generation from 2022-04-01 with stop not measured.
If both pack size and sprint matter and you must pick one number: the catalogue only trades 16.8 kWh against 0.9 s. AT 66.2 kWh is the performance pick inside the same 218 hp FWD SUV 5-doors. AT 83 kWh is the capacity pick inside the same 218 hp FWD SUV 5-doors.