Volkswagen Taos: Which Version Should You Buy?

The Volkswagen Taos range offers four documented versions: 1.6 MT, 1.6 AT, 1.4 T AT, and 1.4 T AT 4x4. The choice comes down to three priorities. The 1.6 MT has a 1,600 cc Gasoline engine with 110 hp, a 5-speed Manual gearbox, and FWD. The 1.6 AT keeps the same engine, output, and drive but adds a 6-speed Automatic.

The Volkswagen Taos range offers four documented versions: 1.6 MT, 1.6 AT, 1.4 T AT, and 1.4 T AT 4x4. The choice comes down to three priorities. The 1.6 MT has a 1,600 cc Gasoline engine with 110 hp, a 5-speed Manual gearbox, and FWD. The 1.6 AT keeps the same engine, output, and drive but adds a 6-speed Automatic. The 1.4 T AT raises output to 150 hp through a 1,400 cc Turbo Gasoline engine, paired with an 8-speed Automatic and FWD. The 1.4 T AT 4x4 combines that 150 hp Turbo engine with a 7-speed Robotic gearbox and AWD. Prices, reliability records, dimensions, weights, torque, acceleration, top speed, and fuel consumption were not measured in the supplied data, so they cannot determine the recommendation.

Volkswagen Taos generations and version availability

The Taos has one generation represented in two catalogue phases. The original 1 generation began in December 2020 and remains listed without a stop date. It uses the SUV 5-doors body and contains all four documented versions: 1.6 MT, 1.6 AT, 1.4 T AT, and 1.4 T AT 4x4.

A restyling within the same generation began in October 2024 and also remains listed without a stop date. It retains the SUV 5-doors body, but no modifications are documented for this restyled phase. Consequently, the supplied data cannot show which engines, gearboxes, or drive systems changed with the restyling. It also cannot support separate Volkswagen Taos specs for later model years.

For buyers comparing generations, there is therefore no numerical basis for claiming that the restyled Taos is faster, more economical, more powerful, or better equipped. The meaningful comparison available here is between the four versions recorded for the original phase of the first generation.

Volkswagen Taos engine specs and version comparison

VersionPowerTorqueDisplacementFuelCylindersCylinder layoutBoostGearboxDrive
1.6 MT110 hpnot measured1,600 ccGasoline, 92not measurednot measurednot measured5-speed ManualFWD
1.6 AT110 hpnot measured1,600 ccGasoline, 92not measurednot measurednot measured6-speed AutomaticFWD
1.4 T AT150 hpnot measured1,400 ccGasoline, 92not measurednot measuredTurbo8-speed AutomaticFWD
1.4 T AT 4x4150 hpnot measured1,400 ccGasoline, 92not measurednot measuredTurbo7-speed RoboticAWD

Every documented engine is mounted Front, transverse and uses Direct injection (direct). Every version also uses an Independent, spring front suspension and an Independent, spring rear suspension, with Ventilated disc front brakes and Disc rear brakes. These shared specifications do not separate one version from another.

The major engine distinction is between the 1,600 cc units in 1.6 MT and 1.6 AT and the smaller Turbo 1,400 cc units in 1.4 T AT and 1.4 T AT 4x4. Each Turbo version produces 150 hp, which is 40 hp more than either 110 hp 1.6 version—an increase of about 36.4%.

Power per litre makes the difference clearer. The 1.6 MT and 1.6 AT each produce 68.75 hp per litre. The 1.4 T AT and 1.4 T AT 4x4 each produce about 107.14 hp per litre. That gives the Turbo versions about 38.39 additional hp per litre, or roughly 55.8% greater specific output. This calculation describes engine output relative to displacement; it does not establish acceleration, durability, or fuel economy.

Torque is not measured for any version. Cylinder count and cylinder layout are also not measured, so no configuration should be inferred from displacement or version names.

Volkswagen Taos performance, mpg, and economy

No 0–100 km/h time is measured for 1.6 MT, 1.6 AT, 1.4 T AT, or 1.4 T AT 4x4. Top speed is also not measured for all four versions.

City fuel consumption, highway fuel consumption, and combined fuel consumption are not measured for any version. As a result, an mpg comparison between the 1,600 cc and 1,400 cc engines is not possible. The smaller displacement of the Turbo engine does not by itself prove lower consumption.

The available numbers establish only that 1.4 T AT and 1.4 T AT 4x4 have 40 hp more than 1.6 MT and 1.6 AT. They do not establish how much quicker either Turbo version is. Likewise, the supplied data cannot quantify the performance effect of FWD versus AWD or of the 8-speed Automatic versus the 7-speed Robotic gearbox.

Volkswagen Taos dimensions, weight, and capacity

Dimensions are not measured for the documented Volkswagen Taos versions. Kerb weight and gross weight are not measured for 1.6 MT, 1.6 AT, 1.4 T AT, or 1.4 T AT 4x4. Therefore, weight per horsepower cannot be calculated, and no version can be identified as having the best power-to-weight ratio.

Ground clearance is not measured for any version. Fuel-tank capacity is not measured, and wheel sizes are not measured. Weight capacity is also not measured. The supplied data identifies every version as an SUV 5-doors but provides no numerical dimensions in millimetres, centimetres, or inches.

These missing measurements matter when choosing between FWD and AWD. Although 1.4 T AT 4x4 is the only AWD version, the data does not state whether it is heavier than 1.4 T AT, how any weight difference affects performance, or whether its carrying capacity differs.

Volkswagen Taos reliability and engine problems

Reliability results and problem records are not measured for any version. The data contains no evidence that the 1,600 cc engine is more reliable than the Turbo 1,400 cc engine, or that Manual, Automatic, or Robotic gearboxes differ in durability.

Engine-light faults, coolant requirements, engine-oil specifications, air-filter details, and engine-cover information are also not measured. These subjects should be checked against the documentation and service history for the individual vehicle rather than inferred from the version name.

Which Volkswagen Taos version should you buy?

Choose 1.6 MT if your priority is the only Manual configuration in the documented range. It combines 110 hp, a 1,600 cc Gasoline engine, a 5-speed Manual gearbox, and FWD. Compared with 1.6 AT, it offers no power or displacement advantage; the defining difference is the gearbox.

Choose 1.6 AT if you want the 110 hp, 1,600 cc Gasoline engine with an Automatic gearbox. Its 6 speeds give it one more listed ratio than the 5-speed 1.6 MT, while engine output and FWD remain the same. Fuel-use and performance differences between these two versions are not measured.

Choose 1.4 T AT if maximum documented horsepower matters and AWD does not. Its 150 hp output is 40 hp higher than either 1.6 version, despite having 200 cc less displacement. It also has the highest gearbox ratio count in the range: its 8-speed Automatic has two more listed ratios than 1.6 AT, three more than 1.6 MT, and one more than 1.4 T AT 4x4. The data does not prove that more ratios produce better economy or acceleration.

Choose 1.4 T AT 4x4 if AWD is the decisive requirement. It matches 1.4 T AT at 150 hp and 1,400 cc, but substitutes a 7-speed Robotic gearbox and AWD for the 8-speed Automatic and FWD. It does not provide additional documented horsepower over 1.4 T AT; what distinguishes it is the drive system and transmission type.

Without price data, the “extra money” attached to any upgrade is not measured, so value cannot be calculated. On specifications alone, 1.4 T AT is the strongest FWD choice because it supplies the range-leading 150 hp with an 8-speed Automatic. 1.4 T AT 4x4 is the corresponding choice when AWD matters more than transmission type. Between the 110 hp versions, the decision is straightforward: 1.6 MT for Manual and 1.6 AT for Automatic.