Volkswagen Scirocco R

Volkswagen Scirocco R: which version to buy

The Volkswagen Scirocco R is a three-door hatchback offered in one generation (2009–2017) with a 2014 restyling. Four catalogue versions exist, all named 2.0 MT or 2.0 DSG. The split that matters is not the name: pre-restyling cars make 265 hp, restyled cars make 280 hp.

Volkswagen Scirocco R: which version to buy

The Volkswagen Scirocco R is a three-door hatchback offered in one generation (2009–2017) with a 2014 restyling. Four catalogue versions exist, all named 2.0 MT or 2.0 DSG. The split that matters is not the name: pre-restyling cars make 265 hp, restyled cars make 280 hp. If you are choosing a used Scirocco R, that 15 hp step, the gearbox, kerb weight, fuel grade, and Euro class decide the car — not a third generation, and not an R-Line badge that is not in this dataset.

---

Scirocco R versions at a glance (which one is which)

All four engines are front, transverse, direct injection (direct), four valves per cylinder. Compression ratio and bore × stroke are measured only on the 2009–2014 pair: 9.8 and 82.5 × 92.8. On both restyling versions those two figures are not measured.

---

1 generation (2009–2014): 265 hp, 98 fuel, Euro 5

Two versions, both Hatchback 3-door. Same 1984 cc turbo Gasoline engine, same 350 Nm from 2500 to 5000 rpm, same 250 km/h limiter.

2.0 MT is the lighter, slower-to-100, thirstier car: 1344 kg kerb, 6.0 s to 100 km/h, mixed 8.1 L/100 km, city 11.3, highway 6.2, CO2 189, Euro 5. Gross weight, ground clearance, and wheel sizes are not measured. Rear brakes: Disc ventilated.

2.0 DSG adds a 6-speed Robotic gearbox and 20 kg (1364 − 1344). That extra mass still leaves it 0.2 s quicker to 100 (5.8 s vs 6.0 s). Mixed consumption drops to 8.0 (−0.1 vs the MT), city to 10.9 (−0.4), highway rises to 6.3 (+0.1). CO2 is 187 (−2). Gross weight, clearance, and wheels remain not measured. Rear brakes stay Disc ventilated.

Specific output on both 265 hp cars: 265 / 1.984 ≈ 133.6 hp per litre. Mass per horsepower: 2.0 MT 1344 / 265 ≈ 5.07 kg/hp; 2.0 DSG 1364 / 265 ≈ 5.15 kg/hp. The DSG is the denser car, not the denser engine.

What this generation does not give you: Euro 6, 95-grade fuel in the data, a measured tank-to-payload figure (gross is not measured), or 280 hp. What it does give you: the lowest kerb weights in the whole Scirocco R set, ventilated discs at both ends, and a fully specified combustion geometry (9.8, 82.5 × 92.8).

---

1 generation, restyling (2014–2017): 280 hp, 95 fuel, Euro 6

Same Hatchback 3-door, same two names, same 1984 cc, same 350 Nm band, same 250 km/h. Power is 280 hp / 206 kW at 6000 rpm — +15 hp / +11 kW versus the 2009–2014 pair. Specific output rises to 280 / 1.984 ≈ 141.1 hp per litre (+7.5 hp/L). Fuel in the data is 95, emissions class Euro 6. Tank stays 55 L. Ground clearance is now measured: 121 mm on both versions. Rear brakes are listed as Disc (not “Disc ventilated”). Compression and bore × stroke: not measured.

2.0 MT (restyling): 1426 kg kerb, 1770 kg gross, 5.7 s to 100, mixed 8.0, city 11.1, highway 6.2, CO2 187. Payload from the two masses: 1770 − 1426 = 344 kg. Versus 2009–2014 2.0 MT: +82 kg kerb, −0.3 s to 100, mixed −0.1, city −0.2, highway unchanged, CO2 −2. Mass per horsepower: 1426 / 280 ≈ 5.09 kg/hp — almost the same as the lighter 265 hp MT (5.07). The extra 15 hp roughly pays for the extra 82 kg on paper; the 0–100 clock still improves by 0.3 s.

2.0 DSG (restyling): 1450 kg kerb, 1800 kg gross, 5.5 s to 100, mixed 7.8, city 10.8, highway 6.2, CO2 185. Payload: 1800 − 1450 = 350 kg. Versus 2009–2014 2.0 DSG: +86 kg, −0.3 s, mixed −0.2, city −0.1, highway −0.1, CO2 −2. Mass per horsepower: 1450 / 280 ≈ 5.18 kg/hp (first-gen DSG was 5.15). Again the power step offsets most of the weight step; the sprint still drops 0.3 s.

Inside the restyling, DSG versus MT: +24 kg, −0.2 s to 100, mixed −0.2, city −0.3, highway equal at 6.2, CO2 −2, payload +6 kg. The Robotic box is still the quicker and more economical of the two 280 hp cars, at the cost of the highest kerb weight in the catalogue (1450 kg).

---

Scirocco R engine specs: what actually changed

Torque did not change: 350 Nm from 2500–5000 rpm on all four versions. Displacement did not change: 1984 cc. Layout did not change: 4 Inline, Turbo, Front transverse, FWD, 6 speeds.

What did change at the restyling:

• Peak power 265 → 280 hp (+5.7%).
• Peak kW 195 → 206.
• Fuel grade in the data 98 → 95.
• Eco class Euro 5 → Euro 6.
• Compression 9.8 → not measured.
• Bore × stroke 82.5 × 92.8 → not measured.
• Rear brakes Disc ventilated → Disc.
• Clearance not measured → 121 mm.
• Gross weight not measured → 1770 / 1800 kg.

Peak power still arrives at 6000 rpm on every version. If you buy on “Scirocco R hp” alone, the restyling is the answer. If you buy on documented engine geometry, only the 2009–2014 2.0 MT and 2.0 DSG list compression and bore × stroke.

---

Performance: 0–100, top speed, and what the extra 15 hp buys

Top speed is 250 km/h on all four cars. Ranking 0–100, fastest to slowest:

1. Restyling 2.0 DSG — 5.5 s 2. Restyling 2.0 MT — 5.7 s 3. 1 generation 2.0 DSG — 5.8 s 4. 1 generation 2.0 MT — 6.0 s

The restyling DSG is 0.5 s quicker than the original MT. DSG beats MT by 0.2 s in both periods. Restyling beats the matching gearbox by 0.3 s. That 0.3 s is the measurable return on +15 hp after +82–86 kg.

The restyling 2.0 MT (5.7 s, 280 hp, 1426 kg) is 0.1 s quicker than the older 2.0 DSG (5.8 s, 265 hp, 1364 kg) despite +62 kg. If the choice is “manual restyle versus DSG pre-restyle,” the numbers favour the later MT on the sprint, and the earlier DSG on kerb weight.

---

Scirocco R mpg / consumption and CO2

Figures below are L/100 km as given (not US mpg converted).

Best mixed and best city: restyling 2.0 DSG. Best (tied) highway: three cars at 6.2; the outlier is first-gen 2.0 DSG at 6.3. Worst mixed and worst CO2: first-gen 2.0 MT.

Range from mixed consumption and the 55 L tank (arithmetic only): first-gen MT 55 / 8.1 ≈ 6.8 × 100 km; restyling DSG 55 / 7.8 ≈ 7.1 × 100 km. The tank never grew.

The restyling also switches listed fuel from 98 to 95. That is a running-cost difference the power figures do not show. Euro 6 versus Euro 5 is the other non-sprint reason to prefer 2014–2017 if local rules care.

---

Dimensions, weight, and ground clearance

Wheel sizes: not measured on every version.

The lightest Scirocco R in the data is 2009–2014 2.0 MT at 1344 kg. The heaviest is restyling 2.0 DSG at 1450 kg (+106 kg). DSG always costs about 20–24 kg versus the MT of the same period.

Only restyled cars have a usable payload number (344 kg MT, 350 kg DSG). On 2009–2014 cars, saying “payload” would be invention: gross is not measured. Clearance 121 mm is likewise a restyling-only measurement; do not assume the earlier cars sit at 121 mm.

Front suspension is Independent, spring on all four; rear is Independent, spring on all four. Front brakes are Ventilated disc on all four. The rear-brake wording is the chassis difference: ventilated on 2009–2014, Disc on 2014–2017.

---

Which Scirocco R to choose

Want the fastest catalogue car: restyling 2.0 DSG — 5.5 s, 280 hp, mixed 7.8, CO2 185, Euro 6, 95 fuel. It is also the heaviest (1450 kg) and the only one with both the best sprint and the best mixed figure.

Want a manual and the later engine: restyling 2.0 MT — 280 hp, 5.7 s, 1426 kg, mixed 8.0, Euro 6, 95, clearance 121 mm, gross 1770 kg. Versus the later DSG you give up 0.2 s and 0.2 mixed L/100 km and save 24 kg.

Want the lightest car: 2009–2014 2.0 MT — 1344 kg, 265 hp, 6.0 s. You accept Euro 5, 98 fuel, mixed 8.1, and not measured gross and clearance. You keep ventilated rear discs and the only fully listed bore/stroke/compression.

Want DSG without the restyle weight: 2009–2014 2.0 DSG — 1364 kg (86 kg under the later DSG), 5.8 s (only 0.3 s behind the later DSG), mixed 8.0. You still run 265 hp, Euro 5, and 98 fuel.

If the question is Scirocco R vs Golf R / Golf GTI: this dataset has no Golf figures. Those comparisons are not measured here.

Reliability / problems: no failure rates, radiator data, or rally-car specs are in the source. Treat reliability as not measured. What you can inspect from the table is the restyling’s extra mass, Euro 6, 95 fuel, and the change in how rear brakes are labelled.

Short rule using only these numbers: buy 2014–2017 2.0 DSG for the best 0–100, mpg, and CO2; buy 2014–2017 2.0 MT if you want 280 hp with a Manual and 24 kg less; buy 2009–2014 2.0 MT if kerb weight is the ranking you care about; buy 2009–2014 2.0 DSG if you want the Robotic box at 1364 kg. Same names in both periods — always check whether the car is 265 hp or 280 hp before you treat two 2.0 MT or two 2.0 DSG listings as the same car.