Toyota WiLL VS: Which Version Should You Buy?
The Toyota WiLL VS choice depends mainly on whether you want a lighter Sedan, an AWD Hatchback 5-door, or the strongest available engine. The 1 generation, produced from 2000 to 2001, offers one 1.3 AT Sedan with 88 hp.
The Toyota WiLL VS choice depends mainly on whether you want a lighter Sedan, an AWD Hatchback 5-door, or the strongest available engine. The 1 generation, produced from 2000 to 2001, offers one 1.3 AT Sedan with 88 hp. The 2 generation, produced from 2001 to 2004, changes to a Hatchback 5-door and offers five versions: 1.5 AT with 109 hp; three distinct 1.8 AT versions with 125 hp, 136 hp, or 190 hp; and 1.8 MT with 190 hp. The 190 hp 1.8 MT has the best weight-to-power figure at about 6.1 kg/hp, while the 125 hp 1.8 AT is the only AWD choice. Price and sale data are not measured, so any decision must be based on specifications rather than purchase cost.
Toyota WiLL VS generations: what changed?
The 1 generation covers 2000–2001 and has a Sedan body with one version, the 1.3 AT. Its 1298 cc Gasoline engine produces 88 hp and 123 Nm, while the car has a 950 kg kerb weight, 155 mm ground clearance, and a 45-liter tank. It is the lightest WiLL VS listed, but it also has the lowest power and torque.
The 2 generation covers 2001–2004 and uses a Hatchback 5-door body. Its five versions expand the range to 109–190 hp, 143–180 Nm, FWD or AWD, and Automatic or Manual transmissions. Compared with the 1 generation 1.3 AT, the lightest 2 generation version is 140 kg heavier, but it adds 21 hp and 20 Nm. Ground clearance rises from 155 mm to 165 mm on the FWD versions and to 175 mm on the AWD version, while tank capacity increases from 45 to 50 liters.
Toyota WiLL VS engine and specs
All six versions use a front, transverse Gasoline engine with 4 Inline cylinders, 4 valves per cylinder, no boost, and distributed multi-point injection. The exact version names repeat in the database, so the three 1.8 AT choices are distinguished below by power.
| Generation and version | Power | Torque | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders and layout | Boost | Gearbox | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 generation — 1.3 AT | 88 hp at 6000 rpm | 123 Nm at 4400 rpm | 1298 cc | 92 | 4, Inline | No | Automatic, 4-speed | FWD |
| 2 generation — 1.5 AT | 109 hp at 6000 rpm | 143 Nm at 4200 rpm | 1496 cc | 92 | 4, Inline | No | Automatic, 4-speed | FWD |
| 2 generation — 1.8 AT, 125 hp | 125 hp at 6000 rpm | 161 Nm at 4200 rpm | 1794 cc | 92 | 4, Inline | No | Automatic, 4-speed | AWD |
| 2 generation — 1.8 AT, 136 hp | 136 hp at 6000 rpm | 171 Nm at 4200 rpm | 1794 cc | 92 | 4, Inline | No | Automatic, 4-speed | FWD |
| 2 generation — 1.8 AT, 190 hp | 190 hp at 7600 rpm | 180 Nm at 6800 rpm | 1795 cc | 95 | 4, Inline | No | Automatic, 4-speed | FWD |
| 2 generation — 1.8 MT | 190 hp at 7600 rpm | 180 Nm at 6800 rpm | 1795 cc | 95 | 4, Inline | No | Manual, 6-speed | FWD |
Power per liter separates the engines clearly. The 1.3 AT produces about 67.8 hp per liter, the 1.5 AT about 72.9 hp per liter, the 125 hp 1.8 AT about 69.7 hp per liter, and the 136 hp 1.8 AT about 75.8 hp per liter. Both 190 hp versions reach about 105.8 hp per liter. Those two also have an 11.5 compression ratio, compared with 10 for the 125 hp and 136 hp engines and 10.5 for the 1.3 AT and 1.5 AT.
Performance, mpg, and economy
Acceleration from 0–100 km/h is not measured for every Toyota WiLL VS version. Top speed is also not measured for every version. City fuel consumption, highway fuel consumption, and combined fuel consumption are not measured across the range, so a verified Toyota WiLL VS mpg comparison cannot be made from these specifications. CO2 output and emissions class are not measured for any version.
The available figures still indicate substantial differences in power relative to weight:
| Generation and version | Kerb weight | Approx. weight per horsepower |
|---|---|---|
| 1 generation — 1.3 AT | 950 kg | 10.8 kg/hp |
| 2 generation — 1.5 AT | 1090 kg | 10.0 kg/hp |
| 2 generation — 1.8 AT, 125 hp | 1220 kg | 9.8 kg/hp |
| 2 generation — 1.8 AT, 136 hp | 1140 kg | 8.4 kg/hp |
| 2 generation — 1.8 AT, 190 hp | 1190 kg | 6.3 kg/hp |
| 2 generation — 1.8 MT | 1150 kg | 6.1 kg/hp |
These ratios are arithmetic comparisons, not acceleration measurements. The 1.8 MT has the strongest numerical weight-to-power result because it matches the 190 hp 1.8 AT while weighing 40 kg less. The 190 hp 1.8 AT remains close, at about 6.3 kg/hp.
Toyota WiLL VS dimensions, weight, and clearance
The 1 generation 1.3 AT weighs 950 kg, clears the ground by 155 mm, and has a 45-liter tank. Gross weight is not measured, and wheel sizes are not measured.
In the 2 generation, the 1.5 AT weighs 1090 kg, the 136 hp 1.8 AT weighs 1140 kg, the 1.8 MT weighs 1150 kg, the 190 hp 1.8 AT weighs 1190 kg, and the 125 hp AWD 1.8 AT weighs 1220 kg. The FWD versions have 165 mm ground clearance; the AWD 1.8 AT has 175 mm. Every 2 generation version has a 50-liter tank. Gross weight and wheel sizes are not measured for any of them.
All versions have Independent, spring front suspension and semi-independent, spring rear suspension. Ventilated disc front brakes are common to the full range. The 1.3 AT, 1.5 AT, and 125 hp AWD 1.8 AT use Drum rear brakes; the 136 hp 1.8 AT, 190 hp 1.8 AT, and 1.8 MT use Disc rear brakes.
Which Toyota WiLL VS version should you choose?
Choose the 1 generation 1.3 AT if the lowest kerb weight is the priority. At 950 kg, it is 140 kg lighter than the next-lightest version. The trade-off is 88 hp, 123 Nm, 155 mm clearance, and the smallest tank at 45 liters. It is also the only Sedan in the data.
Choose the 2 generation 1.5 AT if you want the lightest Hatchback 5-door and do not need AWD. It weighs 1090 kg and produces 109 hp and 143 Nm. Compared with the 1.3 AT, it provides 21 more hp, 20 more Nm, 10 mm more clearance, and 5 liters more tank capacity, at the cost of 140 kg in additional kerb weight.
Choose the 125 hp 1.8 AT specifically for AWD. It is the only AWD WiLL VS listed and has the highest ground clearance at 175 mm. It produces 125 hp and 161 Nm, but its 1220 kg kerb weight makes it the heaviest version. Against the FWD 136 hp 1.8 AT, it gives up 11 hp and 10 Nm, weighs 80 kg more, and gains 10 mm of clearance.
Choose the 136 hp 1.8 AT for the middle ground among the Automatic FWD hatchbacks. It has 27 hp and 28 Nm more than the 1.5 AT while adding only 50 kg. Compared with the 125 hp AWD 1.8 AT, it is 80 kg lighter and has 11 more hp, although it lacks AWD and has 10 mm less ground clearance.
Choose the 190 hp 1.8 AT when maximum listed power and an Automatic gearbox matter together. It adds 54 hp and 9 Nm over the 136 hp 1.8 AT while adding 50 kg. It requires 95 fuel, whereas the lower-powered versions specify 92. Its power peak arrives at 7600 rpm and its torque peak at 6800 rpm.
Choose the 1.8 MT for the strongest specification-to-weight combination. It shares the 190 hp, 180 Nm, 1795 cc engine and 95 fuel requirement of the strongest 1.8 AT, but pairs it with a Manual 6-speed gearbox and weighs 1150 kg—40 kg less than the equivalent Automatic. Its approximately 6.1 kg/hp figure is the best in the catalogue data.
No Toyota WiLL VS price, regional price, used-car listing, or for-sale information is measured here. Reliability, common problems, interior equipment, and modified-car specifications are also not measured. On the available numbers alone, the 1.8 MT is the performance-oriented choice, the 125 hp 1.8 AT is the AWD choice, the 136 hp 1.8 AT is the balanced Automatic FWD option, and the 1.5 AT is the lighter hatchback alternative.