Toyota Vellfire: Which Version Should You Buy?
The Toyota Vellfire version to choose depends mainly on whether you prioritize lower weight, AWD, hybrid power, or maximum performance. Across the two Minivan generations listed here, the range includes 2.4 CVT, 2.5 CVT, and 3.5 AT versions. The strongest choice is the 280 hp 3.5 AT, while the lightest is the second-generation 182 hp 2.5 CVT with FWD at 1,950 kg.
The Toyota Vellfire version to choose depends mainly on whether you prioritize lower weight, AWD, hybrid power, or maximum performance. Across the two Minivan generations listed here, the range includes 2.4 CVT, 2.5 CVT, and 3.5 AT versions. The strongest choice is the 280 hp 3.5 AT, while the lightest is the second-generation 182 hp 2.5 CVT with FWD at 1,950 kg. Buyers seeking AWD without the 3.5 AT’s fuel consumption can consider the hybrid 2.4 CVT or 2.5 CVT. Price data is not available, so this comparison explains what each specification offers rather than estimating value in any market.
Toyota Vellfire generations compared
The first-generation Toyota Vellfire was produced from May 2008 to January 2015 as a Minivan. Its five listed versions comprise three 2.4 CVT entries and two 3.5 AT entries. The 2,362 cc choices produce either 150 hp and 190 Nm in Hybrid form or 170 hp and 224 Nm with Gasoline. The 3,456 cc Gasoline engine produces 280 hp and 344 Nm. FWD and AWD are both represented.
The second-generation Toyota Vellfire covered January 2015 through December 2017, also as a Minivan with five listed versions. Its 2.5 CVT range uses a 2,493 cc engine: the Hybrid AWD version develops 152 hp and 206 Nm, while the Gasoline versions produce 182 hp and 235 Nm with either FWD or AWD. The 3.5 AT retains 3,456 cc, 280 hp, and 344 Nm, again with a choice of FWD or AWD.
Moving from the first-generation Gasoline 2.4 CVT to the second-generation Gasoline 2.5 CVT adds 12 hp and 11 Nm while increasing displacement by 131 cc. The Hybrid changes by 131 cc, 2 hp, and 16 Nm. The 3.5 AT’s listed engine output remains 280 hp and 344 Nm in both generations. Chassis specifications differ more clearly: first-generation versions have Semi-independent, torsion rear suspension and Disc rear brakes, whereas every second-generation version has Independent, spring rear suspension and Disc ventilated rear brakes.
Toyota Vellfire engine specs and version comparison
Repeated version names are distinguished below by generation, power, fuel, and drive. All engines have a Front, transverse location, Distributed injection (multi-point), four valves per cylinder, and No boost.
| Generation and exact version | Power | Torque | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders and layout | Gearbox | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First generation 2.4 CVT, 150 hp | 150 hp at 6,000 rpm | 190 Nm at 4,000 rpm | 2,362 cc | Hybrid, 95 | 4, Inline | Variable | AWD |
| First generation 2.4 CVT, 170 hp | 170 hp at 6,000 rpm | 224 Nm at 4,000 rpm | 2,362 cc | Gasoline, 95 | 4, Inline | Variable | FWD |
| First generation 2.4 CVT, 170 hp | 170 hp at 6,000 rpm | 224 Nm at 4,000 rpm | Gasoline, 2,362 cc | Gasoline, 95 | 4, Inline | Variable | AWD |
| First generation 3.5 AT, 280 hp | 280 hp at 6,200 rpm | 344 Nm at 4,700 rpm | 3,456 cc | Gasoline, 95 | 6, V-shaped | Automatic, 6 | FWD |
| First generation 3.5 AT, 280 hp | 280 hp at 6,200 rpm | 344 Nm at 4,700 rpm | 3,456 cc | Gasoline, 95 | 6, V-shaped | Automatic, 6 | AWD |
| Second generation 2.5 CVT, 152 hp | 152 hp at 5,700 rpm | 206 Nm at 4,800 rpm | 2,493 cc | Hybrid, 95 | 4, Inline | Variable | AWD |
| Second generation 2.5 CVT, 182 hp | 182 hp at 6,000 rpm | 235 Nm at 4,100 rpm | 2,493 cc | Gasoline, 95 | 4, Inline | Variable | FWD |
| Second generation 2.5 CVT, 182 hp | 182 hp at 6,000 rpm | 235 Nm at 4,100 rpm | 2,493 cc | Gasoline, 95 | 4, Inline | Variable | AWD |
| Second generation 3.5 AT, 280 hp | 280 hp at 6,200 rpm | 344 Nm at 4,700 rpm | 3,456 cc | Gasoline, 95 | 6, V-shaped | Automatic, 6 | FWD |
| Second generation 3.5 AT, 280 hp | 280 hp at 6,200 rpm | 344 Nm at 4,700 rpm | 3,456 cc | Gasoline, 95 | 6, V-shaped | Automatic, 6 | AWD |
The Gasoline 2.4 CVT delivers about 72.0 hp per litre, while the Hybrid 2.4 CVT produces about 63.5 hp per litre. In the second generation, the Gasoline 2.5 CVT reaches about 73.0 hp per litre and the Hybrid 2.5 CVT about 61.0 hp per litre. The 3.5 AT produces about 81.0 hp per litre, giving it the highest specific output among these versions.
Compared with the second-generation 182 hp 2.5 CVT, the 280 hp 3.5 AT adds 98 hp and 109 Nm. Against the second-generation 152 hp Hybrid 2.5 CVT, it adds 128 hp and 138 Nm. Buyers choosing the larger engine therefore gain a substantial measured output advantage rather than only a different gearbox.
Toyota Vellfire performance, mpg, and economy
Complete performance and consumption data is available only for the second-generation 3.5 AT versions. The 280 hp FWD 3.5 AT accelerates from 0–100 km/h in 8.3 seconds and reaches 200 km/h. Its consumption is 14.3 l/100 km in the city, 8.3 l/100 km on the highway, and 10.5 l/100 km combined.
The 280 hp AWD 3.5 AT takes 8.6 seconds from 0–100 km/h and also reaches 200 km/h. Consumption is 15.1 l/100 km in the city, 8.5 l/100 km on the highway, and 11 l/100 km combined. Relative to FWD, AWD adds 0.3 seconds to the acceleration time and 0.5 l/100 km to combined consumption. The differences are 0.8 l/100 km in the city and 0.2 l/100 km on the highway.
For the second-generation 152 hp Hybrid 2.5 CVT, 0–100 km/h acceleration is not measured, consumption is not measured, and top speed is 200 km/h. For both 182 hp Gasoline 2.5 CVT versions, acceleration, top speed, and city, highway, and combined consumption are not measured.
For every first-generation 2.4 CVT and 3.5 AT version, acceleration, top speed, and city, highway, and combined consumption are not measured. The available data therefore does not support a numerical fuel-economy claim for the Hybrid or smaller Gasoline engines.
Toyota Vellfire dimensions and weight
The catalogue data provides weight and chassis measurements rather than exterior length, width, or height. Those exterior dimensions are not measured for every version in this comparison.
| Generation and exact version | Kerb weight | Gross weight | Weight per hp | Ground clearance | Tank | Wheel sizes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First generation 2.4 CVT, 150 hp Hybrid AWD | 2,110 kg | not measured | 14.1 kg/hp | 160 mm | 65 l | not measured |
| First generation 2.4 CVT, 170 hp Gasoline FWD | 2,330 kg | not measured | 13.7 kg/hp | 160 mm | 65 l | not measured |
| First generation 2.4 CVT, 170 hp Gasoline AWD | 2,330 kg | not measured | 13.7 kg/hp | 160 mm | 65 l | not measured |
| First generation 3.5 AT, 280 hp FWD | 2,390 kg | not measured | 8.5 kg/hp | 160 mm | 65 l | not measured |
| First generation 3.5 AT, 280 hp AWD | 2,390 kg | not measured | 8.5 kg/hp | 160 mm | 65 l | not measured |
| Second generation 2.5 CVT, 152 hp Hybrid AWD | 2,140 kg | 2,525 kg | 14.1 kg/hp | 165 mm | 65 l | not measured |
| Second generation 2.5 CVT, 182 hp Gasoline FWD | 1,950 kg | 2,390 kg | 10.7 kg/hp | 160 mm | 65 l | not measured |
| Second generation 2.5 CVT, 182 hp Gasoline AWD | 2,050 kg | 2,435 kg | 11.3 kg/hp | 160 mm | 65 l | not measured |
| Second generation 3.5 AT, 280 hp FWD | 2,190 kg | 2,690 kg | 7.8 kg/hp | 160 mm | 65 l | 215/60 R16; 235/50 R18 |
| Second generation 3.5 AT, 280 hp AWD | 2,140 kg | 2,360 kg | 7.6 kg/hp | 160 mm | 65 l | not measured |
Within the second-generation 2.5 CVT Gasoline pair, AWD adds 100 kg of kerb weight and 45 kg of gross weight over FWD. The FWD version’s 10.7 kg/hp is consequently better than the AWD version’s 11.3 kg/hp.
The second-generation 3.5 AT AWD has the best listed weight-to-power ratio at about 7.6 kg/hp, followed by the FWD 3.5 AT at about 7.8 kg/hp. The first-generation 3.5 AT versions are both about 8.5 kg/hp. All versions carry a 65-litre tank. Ground clearance is 160 mm except for the second-generation Hybrid 2.5 CVT, which has 165 mm.
Which Toyota Vellfire version should you choose?
Choose the second-generation 2.5 CVT with 182 hp and FWD if low kerb weight matters most. At 1,950 kg, it is 100 kg lighter than its AWD equivalent and 240 kg lighter than the second-generation FWD 3.5 AT. It combines 182 hp and 235 Nm with the lowest listed kerb weight, although its acceleration, top speed, and consumption are not measured.
Choose the second-generation 2.5 CVT with 182 hp and AWD if all-wheel drive is required but you prefer the smaller Gasoline engine. It retains the FWD version’s 182 hp and 235 Nm but weighs 2,050 kg rather than 1,950 kg.
Choose the second-generation Hybrid 2.5 CVT for the combination of Hybrid fuel, AWD, and the range’s greatest ground clearance. Its 152 hp and 206 Nm are below the Gasoline 2.5 CVT by 30 hp and 29 Nm, while its 2,140 kg kerb weight is 190 kg above the FWD Gasoline version. Consumption is not measured, so this data cannot prove an economy advantage.
Choose the second-generation 3.5 AT with FWD when measured acceleration and lower measured consumption take priority over AWD. It is 0.3 seconds quicker to 100 km/h than the AWD 3.5 AT and uses 0.5 l/100 km less on the combined cycle, while delivering the same 280 hp and 344 Nm.
Choose the second-generation 3.5 AT with AWD when maximum output and AWD must come together. Its 280 hp, 344 Nm, 200 km/h top speed, and approximately 7.6 kg/hp provide the strongest numerical performance case in the listed range. The trade-off is measured combined consumption of 11 l/100 km.
Among first-generation versions, the 170 hp 2.4 CVT offers 20 hp and 34 Nm more than the 150 hp Hybrid 2.4 CVT. The 280 hp 3.5 AT adds a further 110 hp and 120 Nm over the Gasoline 2.4 CVT. However, first-generation performance and consumption figures are not measured. Unless the earlier production period is itself the objective, the second generation provides more complete comparison data, Independent, spring rear suspension, Disc ventilated rear brakes, and a lighter 182 hp FWD option.