Toyota Ractis: Which Version Should You Buy?

The Toyota Ractis choice depends chiefly on drivetrain, transmission, performance, and recorded economy. The first generation, produced from October 2005 to October 2010, offers Gasoline engines with FWD or AWD.

The Toyota Ractis choice depends chiefly on drivetrain, transmission, performance, and recorded economy. The first generation, produced from October 2005 to October 2010, offers Gasoline engines with FWD or AWD. The second generation, produced from November 2010 to August 2016, broadens the selection with Gasoline and Diesel engines, Manual and Variable transmissions, FWD and AWD, and measured acceleration and economy figures. The strongest version is the first-generation 1.5 CVT with 110 hp, while the quickest measured version is either second-generation 1.5 CVT at 11 seconds from 0–100 km/h.

Toyota Ractis generations compared

The first-generation Toyota Ractis is a Mini 5-doors model with four versions. It was produced from October 2005 through October 2010. Its range comprises 1.3 CVT, 1.5 AT, and two 1.5 CVT variants distinguished by drive: one AWD and one FWD. Every listed engine is Gasoline, and every version has 155 mm of ground clearance. Acceleration, top speed, and fuel-consumption figures were not measured for this generation.

The second-generation Toyota Ractis is also a Mini 5-doors model, produced from November 2010 through August 2016. It has six versions: 1.3 MT, 1.3 CVT, two 1.5 CVT variants distinguished by power and drive, 1.4 MT, and 1.4 CVT. Output runs from 90 to 109 hp. This generation adds Diesel choices, Manual transmissions, and measured performance data for every version. Its listed ground clearance is 130 mm for the 103 hp AWD 1.5 CVT and 145 mm for the other five versions, respectively 25 mm and 10 mm less than the first generation’s 155 mm.

Consequently, searches for a Toyota Ractis 2010 can refer to different generations: the first generation ended in October 2010, and the second began in November 2010. Toyota Ractis 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 cars belong to the second generation within the supplied production dates.

Toyota Ractis engine and specifications

GenerationVersionPowerTorqueDisplacementFuelCylindersLayoutBoostGearboxDrive
First1.3 CVT87 hp121 Nm1296 ccGasoline4InlineNoVariableFWD
First1.5 AT105 hp138 Nm1496 ccGasoline4InlineNoAutomatic, 4 speedsAWD
First1.5 CVT, 110 hp, AWD110 hp141 Nm1496 ccGasoline4InlineNoVariableAWD
First1.5 CVT, 110 hp, FWD110 hp141 Nm1496 ccGasoline4InlineNoVariableFWD
Second1.3 MT99 hp128 Nm1329 ccGasoline4InlineNoManual, 6 speedsFWD
Second1.3 CVT99 hp121 Nm1329 ccGasoline4InlineNoVariableFWD
Second1.5 CVT, 103 hp, AWD103 hp132 Nm1496 ccGasoline4InlineNoVariableAWD
Second1.5 CVT, 109 hp, FWD109 hp136 Nm1496 ccGasoline4InlineNoVariableFWD
Second1.4 MT90 hp190 Nm1364 ccDiesel4InlineTurboManual, 6 speedsFWD
Second1.4 CVT90 hp190 Nm1364 ccDiesel4InlineTurboVariableFWD

The first-generation 1.3 CVT produces approximately 67.1 hp per litre. Both 110 hp 1.5 CVT versions reach approximately 73.5 hp per litre, compared with approximately 70.2 hp per litre for the 105 hp 1.5 AT.

In the second generation, the 1.3 MT and 1.3 CVT each produce approximately 74.5 hp per litre. The 103 hp 1.5 CVT develops approximately 68.9 hp per litre, while the 109 hp 1.5 CVT reaches approximately 72.9 hp per litre. Both Diesel versions produce approximately 66.0 hp per litre, but their 190 Nm exceeds the second-generation Gasoline range’s maximum of 136 Nm by 54 Nm.

Transmission choice affects the second-generation 1.3 specifications even though both versions have 99 hp. The 1.3 MT provides 128 Nm at 3800 rpm, while the 1.3 CVT provides 121 Nm at 4400 rpm. The Manual version therefore has 7 Nm more torque, delivered 600 rpm earlier.

Toyota Ractis performance and fuel consumption

GenerationVersion0–100 km/hTop speedCityHighwayCombined
First1.3 CVTnot measurednot measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
First1.5 ATnot measurednot measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
First1.5 CVT, 110 hp, AWDnot measurednot measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
First1.5 CVT, 110 hp, FWDnot measurednot measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
Second1.3 MT13.3 s170 km/h5.5 l/100 km4.8 l/100 km6.8 l/100 km
Second1.3 CVT13.7 s165 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
Second1.5 CVT, 103 hp, AWD11 s170 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
Second1.5 CVT, 109 hp, FWD11 s170 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
Second1.4 MT12.1 s175 km/h4.3 l/100 km3.9 l/100 km5 l/100 km
Second1.4 CVT13 snot measured4.4 l/100 km4 l/100 km5 l/100 km

For the second-generation 1.3 pair, the 1.3 MT reaches 0–100 km/h 0.4 seconds sooner than the 1.3 CVT and has a top speed 5 km/h higher. Its measured fuel figures are 5.5 l/100 km in the city, 4.8 l/100 km on the highway, and 6.8 l/100 km combined; equivalent figures for the 1.3 CVT were not measured.

Both second-generation 1.5 CVT versions reach 0–100 km/h in 11 seconds and 170 km/h. The 109 hp FWD version has 6 hp and 4 Nm more than the 103 hp AWD version, but the supplied acceleration and top-speed results are identical.

Among the Diesel choices, the 1.4 MT is 0.9 seconds quicker to 100 km/h than the 1.4 CVT. It also uses 0.1 l/100 km less in both city and highway measurements, while both have a listed combined figure of 5 l/100 km. The 1.4 MT reaches 175 km/h; the 1.4 CVT top speed was not measured.

The data do not establish comparative fuel consumption for the first-generation versions or for either second-generation 1.5 CVT. They therefore cannot support claims that one of those versions is more economical than another.

Toyota Ractis dimensions, weight, clearance, and tank size

GenerationVersionKerb weightGross weightGround clearanceTankWheel sizes
First1.3 CVT1120 kg1395 kg155 mm42 lnot measured
First1.5 AT1140 kg1415 kg155 mm42 lnot measured
First1.5 CVT, 110 hp, AWD1140 kg1415 kg155 mm42 lnot measured
First1.5 CVT, 110 hp, FWD1140 kg1415 kg155 mm42 lnot measured
Second1.3 MT1180 kgnot measured145 mm42 lnot measured
Second1.3 CVTnot measurednot measured145 mm42 lnot measured
Second1.5 CVT, 103 hp, AWD1170 kg1445 kg130 mm42 lnot measured
Second1.5 CVT, 109 hp, FWD1110 kg1385 kg145 mm42 lnot measured
Second1.4 MT1250 kgnot measured145 mm42 lnot measured
Second1.4 CVTnot measurednot measured145 mm42 lnot measured

The second-generation 109 hp FWD 1.5 CVT has the best calculable weight-to-power ratio in the supplied data at approximately 10.2 kg per hp. The first-generation 110 hp 1.5 CVT versions follow at approximately 10.4 kg per hp. Other calculable results are approximately 10.9 kg per hp for the first-generation 1.5 AT, 11.4 kg per hp for the second-generation 103 hp AWD 1.5 CVT, 11.9 kg per hp for the second-generation 1.3 MT, 12.9 kg per hp for the first-generation 1.3 CVT, and 13.9 kg per hp for the second-generation 1.4 MT.

Within the second-generation 1.5 CVT pair, the 109 hp FWD version is 60 kg lighter than the 103 hp AWD version and has 15 mm more ground clearance. Gross weight is also 60 kg lower. Buyers prioritizing AWD must therefore accept the recorded differences, while buyers prioritizing the stronger weight-to-power ratio have a numerical reason to select the FWD version.

Every listed Toyota Ractis has a 42-litre tank. Wheel sizes and overall exterior dimensions were not measured in the supplied data, so no reliable dimensions in metres can be stated.

Toyota Ractis problems, reliability, and price

Problems, reliability records, maintenance history, engine-number location, engine-oil type, engine prices, vehicle prices, and sale listings are not measured in the supplied data. A specific Toyota Ractis should therefore be assessed through its documented condition and inspection rather than unsupported catalogue claims. No price comparison—including prices in Kenya or offers from individual sellers—can be made from these specifications.

Which Toyota Ractis version should you choose?

Choose the second-generation 1.5 CVT with 109 hp and FWD when measured acceleration and a strong calculable weight-to-power ratio matter most. It reaches 0–100 km/h in 11 seconds, has a 170 km/h top speed, weighs 1110 kg, and provides 145 mm of ground clearance.

Choose the second-generation 1.5 CVT with 103 hp and AWD when AWD is the priority. It matches the 109 hp FWD version’s 11-second acceleration and 170 km/h top speed, but weighs 60 kg more and has 15 mm less clearance.

Choose the second-generation 1.4 MT when measured economy, torque, and top speed lead the decision. Its 190 Nm is the highest torque figure in the range, its 175 km/h top speed is the highest measured value, and it records 4.3 l/100 km city, 3.9 l/100 km highway, and 5 l/100 km combined.

Choose the second-generation 1.4 CVT if the same 90 hp, 190 Nm Diesel specification is wanted with a Variable transmission. Against the 1.4 MT, it is 0.9 seconds slower to 100 km/h and uses an additional 0.1 l/100 km in both measured city and highway driving.

Choose the second-generation 1.3 MT over the 1.3 CVT when comparing only their supplied performance numbers. Both make 99 hp, but the 1.3 MT has 7 Nm more torque, accelerates 0.4 seconds faster, and reaches a top speed 5 km/h higher.

Within the first generation, choose one of the 1.5 CVT versions for the highest output of 110 hp and 141 Nm, then select FWD or AWD according to drivetrain preference. Choose the 1.5 AT when a 4-speed Automatic and AWD are required, or the 1.3 CVT when the smallest listed first-generation displacement is preferred. Because first-generation acceleration and consumption were not measured, its versions cannot be ranked honestly on those criteria.