Toyota Progres specs: overview
The Toyota Progres (model key 2763) is a Toyota sedan. Production of the single generation runs from 1998-05-01 to 2007-05-31. Body type for that generation is Sedan. There is 1 generation and 3 modifications in the data.
The Toyota Progres (model key 2763) is a Toyota sedan. Production of the single generation runs from 1998-05-01 to 2007-05-31. Body type for that generation is Sedan. There is 1 generation and 3 modifications in the data.
People searching for Toyota Progres specs, 1998 Toyota Progres specs, Toyota Progres NC250, Toyota Progres NC300, engine size, horsepower, weight, mpg, interior, parts, coilovers, or a body kit will find the measured figures in the sections below. Names of versions are taken exactly from the database: 2.5 AT, 2.5 AT, and 3.0 AT. The two 2.5 AT rows share the same name and the same 200 hp; they are not the same car. They differ in torque (250 Nm vs 255 Nm), drive (RWD vs AWD), engine layout (Front, longitudinal vs Front, transverse), and kerb weight (1460 kg vs 1550 kg).
No prices, listings, or “for sale” figures appear here: the source data does not include them.
Generations
1 generation (1998-05-01 – 2007-05-31)
1 generation of the Toyota Progres is a Sedan, on sale from 1998-05-01 to 2007-05-31. The generation contains 3 versions, all gasoline, all Automatic with 4 gears, all with a 70 L tank, 160 mm ground clearance, Independent, spring suspension front and rear, Ventilated disc front brakes, and Disc rear brakes (label as in the source). Boost on all three is No.
The three versions of 1 generation are:
- 2.5 AT — 200 hp (147 kW) at 6000 rpm, 250 Nm at 4000 rpm, 2491 cm³, RWD, Front, longitudinal, kerb weight 1460 kg, 1998-05-01 to 2007-05-31.
- 2.5 AT — 200 hp (147 kW) at 6000 rpm, 255 Nm at 4000 rpm, 2491 cm³, AWD, Front, transverse, kerb weight 1550 kg, 1998-05-01 to 2007-05-31.
- 3.0 AT — 215 hp (158 kW) at 5800 rpm, 294 Nm at 3800 rpm, 2997 cm³, RWD, Front, longitudinal, kerb weight 1480 kg, 1998-05-01 to 2007-05-31.
There is no second generation in the data.
Toyota Progres engine specs
All three versions use Gasoline, 6 cylinders, Inline, 4 valves per cylinder, No boost, Distributed injection (multi-point), compression ratio 10.5, and fuel 95. Engine type, engine size, and engine capacity for each version:
2.5 AT (RWD, 250 Nm): displacement 2491 cm³, 6 Inline, Front, longitudinal, 200 hp / 147 kW at 6000 rpm, 250 Nm at 4000 rpm, bore × stroke 86 × 71.5, Automatic 4, RWD.
2.5 AT (AWD, 255 Nm): displacement 2491 cm³, 6 Inline, Front, transverse, 200 hp / 147 kW at 6000 rpm, 255 Nm at 4000 rpm, bore × stroke 86 × 71.5, Automatic 4, AWD.
3.0 AT: displacement 2997 cm³, 6 Inline, Front, longitudinal, 215 hp / 158 kW at 5800 rpm, 294 Nm at 3800 rpm, bore × stroke 86 × 86, Automatic 4, RWD.
The 3.0 AT displacement is 506 cm³ larger than either 2.5 AT (2997 − 2491). Peak power on 3.0 AT is 15 hp higher than on either 2.5 AT (215 − 200) and 11 kW higher (158 − 147). Peak torque on 3.0 AT is 44 Nm above the RWD 2.5 AT (294 − 250) and 39 Nm above the AWD 2.5 AT (294 − 255). Between the two 2.5 AT rows, torque differs by 5 Nm (255 − 250) in favour of AWD.
Horsepower peaks at 6000 rpm on both 2.5 AT versions and at 5800 rpm on 3.0 AT. Torque peaks at 4000 rpm on both 2.5 AT versions and at 3800 rpm on 3.0 AT.
Searches for Toyota Progres 2JZ, Toyota Progres 1JZ, NC250 engine, NC300 engine, or engine bay layout are not answered by extra factory codes in this dataset: the measured engine description is Gasoline, 6, Inline, 4 valves per cylinder, No boost, as tabulated.
Specs table
| Version | hp | kW | rpm (hp) | Nm | rpm (Nm) | Displacement (cm³) | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Gears | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 AT | 200 | 147 | 6000 | 250 | 4000 | 2491 | Gasoline | 6 | Inline | No | Automatic | 4 | RWD |
| 2.5 AT | 200 | 147 | 6000 | 255 | 4000 | 2491 | Gasoline | 6 | Inline | No | Automatic | 4 | AWD |
| 3.0 AT | 215 | 158 | 5800 | 294 | 3800 | 2997 | Gasoline | 6 | Inline | No | Automatic | 4 | RWD |
Engine position (not the cylinder layout): Front, longitudinal on RWD 2.5 AT and on 3.0 AT; Front, transverse on AWD 2.5 AT.
Performance, mpg, and fuel consumption
0–100 km/h for 2.5 AT (RWD, 250 Nm): not measured. 0–100 km/h for 2.5 AT (AWD, 255 Nm): not measured. 0–100 km/h for 3.0 AT: not measured.
Top speed for 2.5 AT (RWD): not measured. Top speed for 2.5 AT (AWD): not measured. Top speed for 3.0 AT: not measured.
City fuel consumption for all three versions: not measured. Highway fuel consumption for all three versions: not measured. Combined fuel consumption for all three versions: not measured.
Toyota Progres mpg and Toyota Progress fuel consumption therefore have no numeric value in this catalogue. CO2 for all three versions: not measured. Eco class for all three versions: not measured.
Fuel specified for every version is 95. Tank volume is 70 L on 2.5 AT (RWD), 2.5 AT (AWD), and 3.0 AT.
Dimensions, weight, and ground clearance
Overall length, width, height, wheelbase, and tyre/wheel sizes for the Toyota Progres: not measured (wheel size field is empty on all three versions).
Kerb weight:
- 2.5 AT RWD (250 Nm): 1460 kg
- 2.5 AT AWD (255 Nm): 1550 kg
- 3.0 AT: 1480 kg
The AWD 2.5 AT is 90 kg heavier than the RWD 2.5 AT (1550 − 1460) and 70 kg heavier than 3.0 AT (1550 − 1480). 3.0 AT is 20 kg heavier than RWD 2.5 AT (1480 − 1460).
Gross vehicle weight for 2.5 AT (RWD): not measured. Gross vehicle weight for 2.5 AT (AWD): not measured. Gross vehicle weight for 3.0 AT: not measured.
Ground clearance is 160 mm on all three versions.
Tank: 70 L on all three versions.
Chassis items that are the same on every version: Independent, spring front suspension; Independent, spring rear suspension; Ventilated disc front brakes; Disc rear brakes.
Toyota Progres interior, parts, body kit, coilovers
Interior equipment, factory body kits, coilovers, and spare-parts catalogues are not in the source data. What is measured for the running gear is Independent, spring suspension at both ends, Ventilated disc front brakes, Disc rear brakes, 160 mm clearance, and the kerb weights above. Aftermarket coilovers or a body kit would sit on that chassis; this article does not invent kit names or spring rates.
Problems, common problems, reliability
The source data does not list failure modes, recall counts, or reliability scores for the Toyota Progres. Statements such as “common problems” therefore have no measured list here. What can be stated from the numbers: all three versions share Gasoline, 6 Inline, No boost, Distributed injection (multi-point), Automatic 4, compression 10.5, fuel 95, and the same suspension and brake labels. Differences that can affect use are drive (RWD vs AWD), engine position (Front, longitudinal vs Front, transverse), displacement (2491 vs 2997 cm³), power (200 vs 215 hp), torque (250 / 255 / 294 Nm), and kerb weight (1460 / 1550 / 1480 kg).
Toyota Progres vs Altezza
No Altezza figures are in this dataset, so a numeric comparison is not possible. For the Progres side only: one Sedan generation, 1998-05-01 to 2007-05-31, three Automatic versions, two at 200 hp and 2491 cm³, one at 215 hp and 2997 cm³, RWD or AWD, kerb weight 1460–1550 kg, tank 70 L, clearance 160 mm. Acceleration, top speed, and mpg: not measured.
Origin
The brand in the data is Toyota. The English model name is Progres. Generation count is 1. Production window is 1998-05-01 through 2007-05-31. Country-of-sale lists (Kenya, Sri Lanka, UK, Pakistan, New Zealand) are not in the data.
Which version to choose
All three cars are Gasoline Automatic 4-speed sedans with 6 Inline cylinders, 4 valves per cylinder, No boost, Distributed injection (multi-point), compression 10.5, fuel 95, 70 L tank, 160 mm clearance, Independent, spring suspension, Ventilated disc front brakes, and Disc rear brakes. Choice is therefore among the measured differences.
2.5 AT (200 hp, 250 Nm, RWD, Front, longitudinal, 1460 kg) is the lightest. Power matches the other 2.5 AT. Torque is 5 Nm below the AWD 2.5 AT and 44 Nm below 3.0 AT. Displacement is 2491 cm³. Drive is RWD. 0–100, top speed, and consumption: not measured.
2.5 AT (200 hp, 255 Nm, AWD, Front, transverse, 1550 kg) is the only AWD version and the heaviest: +90 kg vs RWD 2.5 AT, +70 kg vs 3.0 AT. Engine position is Front, transverse, unlike the other two (Front, longitudinal). Same 200 hp and 2491 cm³ as RWD 2.5 AT, with 5 Nm more torque. 0–100, top speed, and consumption: not measured.
3.0 AT (215 hp, 294 Nm, RWD, Front, longitudinal, 1480 kg) is the only 2997 cm³ version. It has the highest power (+15 hp vs either 2.5 AT) and the highest torque (294 Nm). Kerb weight sits 20 kg above RWD 2.5 AT and 70 kg below AWD 2.5 AT. Bore × stroke is 86 × 86 versus 86 × 71.5 on both 2.5 AT rows. Drive is RWD. 0–100, top speed, and consumption: not measured.
If the requirement is AWD, the data has one match: 2.5 AT at 200 hp / 255 Nm / 1550 kg. If the requirement is the lowest measured kerb weight, the match is 2.5 AT at 200 hp / 250 Nm / 1460 kg RWD. If the requirement is the largest engine and the highest hp and Nm in this catalogue, the match is 3.0 AT. Wheel sizes, gross weight, mpg, and 0–100 are not measured on any version, so they cannot break the tie.