Specs table: four 0.7 CVT versions side by side

Injection on all four is Distributed injection (multi-point). Front brakes: Ventilated disc. Rear brakes: Drum. Front suspension: Independent, spring.

Version (as in the catalogue)hp / kW @ rpmNm @ rpmcm³FuelCylinders / layoutBoostGearboxDrive
0.7 CVT 52 hp FWD52 / 38 @ 680060 @ 5200658Gasoline (92)3 InlineNoVariableFWD
0.7 CVT 52 hp AWD52 / 38 @ 680060 @ 5200658Gasoline (92)3 InlineNoVariableAWD
0.7 CVT 64 hp FWD64 / 47 @ 640092 @ 4000658Gasoline (92)3 InlineTurboVariableFWD
0.7 CVT 64 hp AWD64 / 47 @ 640092 @ 4000658Gasoline (92)3 InlineTurboVariableAWD

Injection on all four is Distributed injection (multi-point). Front brakes: Ventilated disc. Rear brakes: Drum. Front suspension: Independent, spring.

Engine: what the extra 12 hp actually is

Displacement does not change: 658 cm³ on every 0.7 CVT. The step is boost.

Deltas (Turbo minus No):

The Turbo 0.7 CVT is the same three-cylinder Inline Gasoline size with more twist lower in the rev range. If the question is “which engine,” the 64 hp pair is the stronger of the two calibrations; the 52 hp pair is the naturally aspirated calibration.

Drive: FWD vs AWD on the same 0.7 CVT badge

Power does not change with drive. 52 hp FWD and 52 hp AWD share 52 hp, 38 kW, 60 Nm, No boost. 64 hp FWD and 64 hp AWD share 64 hp, 47 kW, 92 Nm, Turbo. AWD is not extra horsepower.

What does change is the rear axle:

Ground clearance is the same 160 mm on all four. Tank is the same 36 L. Gearbox is Variable on all four. AWD does not buy more millimetres of ride height in this data set.

Weight is not measured on any version, so kg per horsepower cannot be calculated. You cannot claim AWD is “heavier” from these numbers; you can only say mass is not measured.

Performance and mpg: not measured on every version

0–100, top speed, city / highway / combined consumption, and CO2 are not measured for:

Eco class is not measured. Wheel sizes are not measured. Choosing on claimed sprint or mpg from this catalogue is not possible; those figures are not in the source.

What you can use: the Turbo’s +53.3% torque and 1200 rpm earlier peak, versus the No-boost engine’s 60 Nm at 5200 rpm. That is a powertrain comparison, not a timed 0–100.

Dimensions, weight, tank

ParameterAll four 0.7 CVT versions
BodyMicrovan
Ground clearance160 mm
Fuel tank36 L
Fuel grade92
Kerb weightnot measured
Gross weightnot measured
Wheel sizesnot measured

There is no generation-to-generation size change: there is only 1 generation. Clearance and tank do not differ by power or drive.

Generations: one generation, four versions, no restyle split

Production of generation 1 is 2011-09-01 to 2017-01-31 for every 0.7 CVT. There is no second generation and no restyle listed as a separate generation. You are not choosing “newer Pixis Space vs older”; you are choosing among four concurrent 0.7 CVT lines that share years, body, displacement, gearbox type, tank, clearance, front brakes, rear brakes, and injection type.

Which version to choose

Buy 0.7 CVT 64 hp FWD if you want the largest engine step without AWD: 64 hp / 92 Nm / Turbo versus 52 / 60 / No, same FWD, same Variable, same 160 mm, same 36 L. Rear axle stays Semi-independent, springorts hélicoïdaux, sem. This is +12 hp and +32 Nm for no change in catalogue drive.

Buy 0.7 CVT 64 hp AWD if you want that same Turbo calibration and AWD, plus the Independent, spring rear (the FWD cars do not get that rear layout in the data). Power is identical to 64 hp FWD: 64 hp, 47 kW, 92 Nm. You are paying (in specification, not in price — prices are not in the data) for drive and rear suspension type, not for more horsepower.

Buy 0.7 CVT 52 hp FWD if you want the No-boost 52 hp / 60 Nm calibration and FWD. Specific output is the lower ≈79.0 hp/L. Peak torque is 60 Nm at 5200 rpm, 1200 rpm later and 32 Nm weaker than Turbo. This is the smallest power/torque combination in the line.

Buy 0.7 CVT 52 hp AWD if you want AWD without Turbo: still 52 hp and 60 Nm, same as 52 hp FWD, with Independent, spring rear instead of the FWD rear. Versus 64 hp AWD you give up 12 hp and 32 Nm and keep No boost.

Pairwise arithmetic (allowed deltas)

ComparisonWhat changesWhat does not
64 hp FWD vs 52 hp FWD+12 hp, +9 kW, +32 Nm, Turbo vs No, peak hp 6400 vs 6800, peak Nm 4000 vs 5200FWD, Variable, 658 cm³, 36 L, 160 mm, 3 Inline, Gasoline 92
64 hp AWD vs 52 hp AWDsame engine deltas as aboveAWD, Independent spring rear, Variable, 658, 36 L, 160 mm
52 hp AWD vs 52 hp FWDAWD vs FWD; rear Independent, spring vs Semi-independent, springorts hélicoïdaux, sem52 hp, 60 Nm, No boost, 6800 / 5200 rpm
64 hp AWD vs 64 hp FWDAWD vs FWD; same rear-axle split as above64 hp, 92 Nm, Turbo, 6400 / 4000 rpm
64 hp FWD vs 52 hp AWDmixed: +12 hp and Turbo, but FWD instead of AWD658 cm³, Variable, 36 L, 160 mm
64 hp AWD vs 52 hp FWDlargest spec spread: Turbo + AWD + Independent rear vs No + FWD + semi-independent rearstill one 0.7 CVT name, same years, same tank and clearance

Decision in one line

There is no second generation to “wait for.” If the data must pick one default, 0.7 CVT 64 hp FWD is the version that buys the +53.3% torque step at the same drive as the entry FWD car; step to 0.7 CVT 64 hp AWD only if you specifically want AWD and the Independent, spring rear. Stay on 0.7 CVT 52 hp only if you want No boost and accept 60 Nm. Do not choose on 0–100, mpg, or kerb weight: those are not measured. Do not choose on price: prices are not in this source.