TOGG TX10

TOGG TX10: which version to buy

If you are choosing a TOGG TX10, the catalogue has one generation and three named versions, all SUV 5-doors, all Electro, all Automatic with 1 speed, all RWD. The buying question is not generation versus generation.

If you are choosing a TOGG TX10, the catalogue has one generation and three named versions, all SUV 5-doors, all Electro, all Automatic with 1 speed, all RWD. The buying question is not generation versus generation. It is AT versus AT 52.4 kWh versus AT 88.5 kWh: 435 hp versus 218 hp, 4.8 s versus 7.4 s versus 7.8 s to 100 km/h, and a larger pack name versus a smaller pack name on the two 218 hp cars. There is no second generation to wait for in these data: production of 1 generation starts 2022-10-01 and stop is not measured (still open).

Which TX10 version to buy: the three choices in one paragraph

AT (from 2022-10-01) is the only 435 hp / 319 kW / 713 Nm car: 217 hp more than either later version, 356 Nm more than AT 52.4 kWh (713 − 357), and 2.6 s quicker to 100 km/h than AT 52.4 kWh (7.4 − 4.8) and 3.0 s quicker than AT 88.5 kWh (7.8 − 4.8). AT 52.4 kWh and AT 88.5 kWh (both from 2023-03-01) share 218 hp / 160 kW, the same 185 km/h top speed, the same RWD Automatic 1-speed layout, and the same 0 g/km CO2. They differ in the pack figure in the name (88.5 − 52.4 = 36.1 kWh more on the larger name) and in 0–100: AT 52.4 kWh is 0.4 s quicker (7.8 − 7.4). Torque on AT 88.5 kWh is not measured, so you cannot rank that version on Newton-metres. Kerb weight, gross weight, ground clearance, tank, wheels, and consumption are not measured on any version, so this article cannot pick a “lightest” or “most efficient” TX10.

Generations: what 1 generation actually changed between versions

TOGG TX10 has 1 generation (key 7819), body SUV 5-doors, 3 versions. There is no restyling listed as a separate generation.

The generation did not swap body type or drive layout. What changed inside 1 generation is the version set over time:

• From 2022-10-01, the line is the single AT: 435 hp, 713 Nm, 4.8 s to 100 km/h. Top speed for AT is not measured.
• From 2023-03-01, two more names join and remain open (stop not measured): AT 52.4 kWh (218 hp, 357 Nm, 7.4 s, 185 km/h) and AT 88.5 kWh (218 hp, torque not measured, 7.8 s, 185 km/h).

That is a calendar gap of five months from the first AT date to the two 218 hp dates. After 2023-03-01 you are not choosing a new generation; you are choosing among three concurrent Electro RWD SUVs that share independent spring suspension front and rear, ventilated disc front brakes, and Disc rear brakes.

Because there is only one generation, “which generation to buy” collapses to “which of the three names in 1 generation.” No later generation in these data added AWD, a second body, or a different gearbox type.

Specs compared: engine, gearbox, drive (every version named as in the database)

Displacement is not measured on any TX10 version (all Electro). Power per litre cannot be calculated. Cylinders, cylinder layout, valves per cylinder, boost, engine location, and fuel system are not measured on AT, AT 52.4 kWh, and AT 88.5 kWh. Fuel in the data is Electro. CO2 is 0 on all three. Gearbox is Automatic, speeds 1, drive RWD on all three.

AT versus AT 52.4 kWh: 435 ÷ 218 ≈ 2.00, so AT is listed at essentially double the horsepower (217 hp more). 319 − 160 = 159 kW more. 713 ÷ 357 ≈ 2.00, so peak torque is also about double where both figures exist.

AT versus AT 88.5 kWh: same 217 hp / 159 kW gap as versus AT 52.4 kWh, but torque cannot be compared because AT 88.5 kWh torque is not measured.

AT 52.4 kWh versus AT 88.5 kWh: horsepower and kilowatts are identical (218 hp, 160 kW). The names differ by 36.1 kWh. That is a name-level pack figure, not a measured range, not a measured consumption, and not a measured weight. Do not treat 36.1 kWh as proven extra touring ability; the catalogue does not measure consumption or mass.

Performance: 0–100, top speed, mpg — what the extra power actually buys

Consumption city, highway, and combined is not measured for AT, AT 52.4 kWh, and AT 88.5 kWh. There is no mpg ranking. CO2 is 0 on all three, so emissions in these data do not separate the versions.

Arithmetic on the sprint:

• AT is 2.6 s faster than AT 52.4 kWh and 3.0 s faster than AT 88.5 kWh.
• AT 52.4 kWh is 0.4 s faster than AT 88.5 kWh despite equal 218 hp. The data do not give kerb weight, so that 0.4 s cannot be turned into a kg/hp story; weight per horsepower is not measured.
• Relative 0–100: 7.4 ÷ 4.8 ≈ 1.54, so AT 52.4 kWh takes about 54% more time to 100 km/h than AT. 7.8 ÷ 4.8 ≈ 1.63, so AT 88.5 kWh takes about 63% more time than AT.

Top speed: AT 52.4 kWh and AT 88.5 kWh are tied at 185 km/h. AT top speed is not measured, so you cannot claim the 435 hp car is faster at the top — only that it is faster to 100 km/h.

If the buying criterion is the shortest 0–100 in this catalogue, the answer is AT at 4.8 s. If the criterion is a measured 185 km/h cap plus 218 hp, the two later names are equal on speed and power; AT 52.4 kWh then wins the sprint by 0.4 s. If the criterion is the larger pack figure in the version name, AT 88.5 kWh is the only name with 88.5 kWh; that costs 0.4 s versus AT 52.4 kWh on 0–100, with torque not measured.

Dimensions, weight, clearance, tank, wheels

For AT, AT 52.4 kWh, and AT 88.5 kWh all of the following are not measured: kerb weight, gross weight, ground clearance, tank, wheel sizes.

You cannot choose a TX10 version on payload, ride height, or tyre package from these data. Independent spring suspension is the same front and rear on all three. Front brakes are ventilated disc on all three; rear brakes are Disc on all three. Chassis language in the catalogue does not split the range.

Weight per horsepower cannot be computed. “What the extra money buys” also cannot be priced: prices are not in the data. What can be said is what extra listed power and extra name-plate kWh buy in measured figures:

• Extra power on AT (217 hp over the 218 hp pair) buys a 2.6–3.0 s shorter 0–100. It does not come with a measured top speed, measured mass, or measured consumption.
• Extra 36.1 kWh in the AT 88.5 kWh name versus AT 52.4 kWh does not buy more horsepower (both 218 hp) and does not buy a higher listed top speed (both 185). It coincides with a 0.4 s slower 0–100.

Which version to choose

Choose AT if the decision is performance among these three names. It is the only 435 hp / 319 kW / 713 Nm TX10, the only 4.8 s car, and the only version on sale from 2022-10-01 in these data. You accept that top speed, weight, clearance, wheels, tank, and consumption are not measured, including on this flagship.

Choose AT 52.4 kWh if you want the later 218 hp pair’s measured 185 km/h and the quicker of the two 218 hp sprints (7.4 s). Versus AT you give up 217 hp and 2.6 s to 100 km/h. Versus AT 88.5 kWh you give up the 36.1 kWh in the other name and gain 0.4 s to 100 km/h. Torque is measured here (357 Nm); on AT 88.5 kWh it is not.

Choose AT 88.5 kWh if the version name’s 88.5 kWh is the point of the purchase and you accept 7.8 s to 100 km/h, 218 hp, 185 km/h, torque not measured, and the same unmeasured weight and economy as the rest of the line.

Do not choose by generation: there is only 1 generation, SUV 5-doors, still open. Do not choose by drive or gearbox: all three are RWD Automatic 1. Do not choose by mpg or kerb weight: those figures are not measured. Do not invent a fourth name: the anchors are exactly AT, AT 52.4 kWh, and AT 88.5 kWh.

Problems and reliability are not in the supplied data, so they are not ranked here. The comparison that the numbers support is narrow and complete: one high-power AT, then two equal-power pack-named cars that differ by 36.1 kWh in the name and by 0.4 s on 0–100.