Peugeot 4007 (2007–2014) Overview: Specs, Generations and Best Versions
Peugeot 4007 specs at a glance: a 5-door SUV built from 2007 to 2014 with 147–170 hp, one generation, seven modifications, manual, CVT and automated manual gearboxes, FWD or 4x4.
The Peugeot 4007 is a 5-door SUV produced from 2007 to 2014 in a single generation, with outputs from 147 to 170 hp. If you are comparing Peugeot 4007 specs, the lineup is compact: seven modifications, three gearbox types (manual, CVT, automated manual) and a choice of front-wheel drive or 4x4. It suits drivers who want a mid-size SUV with available all-wheel drive and a diesel option.
Peugeot 4007 generations
1 generation (2007–2014)
The first and only generation of the Peugeot 4007 ran from 2007 to 2014, offered solely as a 5-door SUV. Power spans 147 to 170 hp across seven modifications. Transmissions include a manual, a CVT and an automated manual (EGS), with FWD and 4x4 drivetrains. Standout versions include the diesel 2.2 MT with 156 hp and the petrol-range-topping 2.4 MT with 170 hp.
Which Peugeot 4007 to buy
- 2.2 MT (1 generation): the volume choice — a 2179 cc diesel with 156 hp, 4x4, 0–100 km/h in 11.0 s and fuel consumption of 7.2 l/100 km.
- 2.4 MT (1 generation): the most powerful option — 170 hp from a 2360 cc engine with 4x4 and manual gearbox, reaching 100 km/h in 9.2 s, at the cost of 9.4 l/100 km.
- 2.2 EGS (1 generation): the same 156 hp 2179 cc diesel with 4x4 and the same 7.2 l/100 km, but paired with an automated manual for two-pedal driving without giving up the 11.0 s acceleration.
When buying used, note that every Peugeot 4007 falls within 2007–2014 and belongs to one generation, so there is no cross-generation trap: differences come down to engine, gearbox and drivetrain. With only seven modifications, comparing specific cars against the list above is straightforward.
Which Peugeot 4007 to avoid
The numbers do not single out a dominated version. The 2.2 MT and 2.2 EGS share identical figures (156 hp, 11.0 s, 7.2 l/100 km, 4x4), differing only in gearbox type, and the 2.4 MT trades higher consumption (9.4 vs 7.2 l/100 km) for more power (170 vs 156 hp) and quicker acceleration (9.2 vs 11.0 s). Choose by gearbox preference and the power-versus-economy balance rather than by elimination.