Which Osca 2500 GT version to buy
Buy 2.5 MT if you want this model at all. The data contain 1 generation and 1 modification. There is no 2.5 AT, no extra-power twin, and no four-wheel-drive row to split the field.
Buy 2.5 MT if you want this model at all. The data contain 1 generation and 1 modification. There is no 2.5 AT, no extra-power twin, and no four-wheel-drive row to split the field.
That single row is not a “base” trim waiting for a hotter sibling. 2.5 MT is the whole catalogue: 190 hp, 235 Nm, 5-speed Manual, RWD, Central engine, Opposite 4-cylinder layout, boost No.
What the numbers buy, versus a heavier GT of the same displacement, is mass. 680 kg kerb weight against 190 hp is 3.58 kg per horsepower (680 ÷ 190). Per tonne that is 279.4 hp/t (190 ÷ 0.680). Torque per tonne is 345.6 Nm/t (235 ÷ 0.680). Those ratios are why 6 s to 100 km/h sits next to 190 hp rather than next to a much larger engine.
If you need a second gearbox, a second body, or a later generation with different figures, this model does not offer them. The choice is 2.5 MT or a different Osca nameplate.
Generations: what changed (and what did not)
1 generation ran 1999-01-01–2001-12-31. Body: Coupe. Versions in this generation: 1 — 2.5 MT. No restyling entry exists in the data, so there is no mid-cycle “which facelift” fork.
Production window is three calendar years with one specification frozen for the whole run. Start and stop dates on the generation and on 2.5 MT are the same: 1999-01-01 to 2001-12-31. A 1999 car and a 2001 car are not separable by horsepower, torque, gearbox, or drive in this dataset.
There is no 2nd generation to compare displacement, weight, or 0–100. Arithmetic across generations is not possible because pokoleniy is 1.
Engine and specs: the only row
| Version | hp | Nm | Displacement (cm³) | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 MT | 190 | 235 | 2457 | Gasoline | 4 | Opposite | No | Manual | RWD |
2.5 MT specific output: 190 ÷ 2.457 ≈ 77.3 hp per litre. Specific torque: 235 ÷ 2.457 ≈ 95.6 Nm per litre. Compression ratio is 9.5. Bore × stroke is 99.5 × 79. Valves per cylinder: 4 (4 × 4 = 16 valves). Fuel grade: 95. Induction: Distributed injection (multi-point). Engine position: Central. Boost: No.
Peak torque at 2800 rpm and peak power at 6000 rpm leave a 3200 rpm gap. The 5-speed Manual is the only transmission; peredach is 5. Drive is RWD only.
140 kW is the same peak as 190 hp on this row, not a second tune. Do not treat kilowatts as a hidden “hotter” 2.5 MT.
Performance, mpg, and what is not measured
2.5 MT 0–100: 6 s. Top speed: 220 km/h. Combined with 680 kg, that 6 s is the performance argument for this version — there is no slower or faster sibling to subtract from.
Fuel consumption city: not measured. Highway: not measured. Combined / mpg: not measured. CO₂: not measured. Eco class: not measured. Any mpg ranking of Osca 2500 GT versions is empty: there is one version and no consumption figure on it.
Tank volume is 80 L. Relative to 680 kg kerb weight that is 11.8 L of tank per 100 kg (80 ÷ 6.80). Range cannot be calculated: consumption is not measured.
Dimensions, weight, and chassis numbers
Kerb weight 2.5 MT: 680 kg. Gross weight: not measured. Ground clearance: not measured. Wheel sizes: not measured. Fuel tank: 80 L.
Front suspension: Independent, spring. Rear suspension: Independent, spring. Front brakes: Ventilated disc. Rear brakes: Disc.
Without gross weight you cannot compute payload. Without wheels and clearance you cannot compare tyre packages or ride height between versions — there are no other versions, and those fields are not measured on 2.5 MT.
Weight-to-power is the dimension that is measured and that decides the car: 3.58 kg/hp. If a later catalogue ever listed a heavier Osca with the same 190 hp, that car would be a different buying decision. Inside 2500 GT, 680 kg is the only kerb figure.
Problems, reliability, and what the sheet cannot tell you
This dataset has no failure rates, service intervals, or known-fault lists. Reliability and “common problems” for Osca 2500 GT 2.5 MT are not measured. Do not infer durability from 9.5 compression, No boost, or Opposite 4 cylinders; those are specification labels, not warranty history.
What you can read as a buyer: naturally aspirated (No boost), Manual 5, RWD, Central engine, Gasoline 95, Coupe, 1999–2001 only. There is no automatic to choose for traffic, no AWD for weather, and no second generation that changed those facts.
Which version to choose — numbers only
1. Want Osca 2500 GT: the version is 2.5 MT. Count of alternatives in the data: 0. 2. Want this power-to-weight: 190 hp / 680 kg = 3.58 kg/hp; 0–100 6 s; 220 km/h. That is the performance package. There is no detuned 2.5 MT. 3. Want mpg, eco class, or CO₂ in the brochure: all three are not measured on 2.5 MT. You cannot pick a “more efficient” 2500 GT. 4. Want automatic, extra driven wheels, or another body: gearbox is Manual, drive is RWD, body is Coupe. No other combination exists in 1 generation. 5. Want a later facelift with different hp: generation start/stop and 2.5 MT start/stop are identical (1999-01-01–2001-12-31). Year of production does not change 190 hp, 235 Nm, or 2457 cm³.
2.5 MT in one line: Gasoline 2457 cm³ Opposite 4, boost No, 190 hp at 6000 rpm, 235 Nm at 2800 rpm, Manual 5, RWD, Central engine, 680 kg, 80 L tank, 6 s, 220 km/h, Coupe, 1999–2001. If those figures are the car, this is the version. If you need a second column in the table, this model does not have one.