Generations: what changed between 4 generation and 5 generation

Same body type in both generations (SUV 3-doors). The generation change is not “more doors”; it is more power on the shared displacements, a 95 l tank on every 5 generation row, and — on most 5 generation rows — 5 mm less clearance than 4 generation (215 vs 220), except 4.8 AT, which is 5 mm above 4 generation (225 vs 220).

4 generation (1987–1997) is the older SUV 3-doors set: 12 versions, all AWD, ground clearance 220 mm on every row. Tank size is not uniform: six versions carry 95 l, six carry 80 l. Gross weight, where measured, is 2300 kg. Kerb weight is measured on only two rows. Peak power is 125, 145 or 175 hp. The 175 hp pair is Gasoline; everything else is Diesel.

5 generation (1997–2017) is the later SUV 3-doors set: 11 versions, all AWD. Ground clearance is 215 mm on ten versions and 225 mm on 4.8 AT. Tank size is 95 l on every row. Peak power is 135, 160, 170, 200 or 245 hp. Two versions are Gasoline (4.5 AT, 4.8 AT); nine are Diesel. The 5 generation Diesel 2.8 is 10 hp above the 4 generation Diesel 2.8 (135 vs 125). The 5 generation Diesel 4.2 is 15 hp above the 4 generation Turbo Diesel 4.2 (160 vs 145) and 35 hp above the 4 generation non-turbo Diesel 4.2 (160 vs 125).

Same body type in both generations (SUV 3-doors). The generation change is not “more doors”; it is more power on the shared displacements, a 95 l tank on every 5 generation row, and — on most 5 generation rows — 5 mm less clearance than 4 generation (215 vs 220), except 4.8 AT, which is 5 mm above 4 generation (225 vs 220).

Engines and specs: every named version, distinguished where names collide

Use the names exactly as in the catalogue. Where two rows share 2.8 MT, 2.8 AT, 3.0 AT, 4.2 MT or 4.2 AT, the split is horsepower, torque, valves, boost, tank, kerb, or suspension — not a renamed model.

5 generation Diesel, 2825 cm³, 6 cylinders, Inline, Turbo, Front, longitudinal

Versionhp @ rpmNm @ rpmvalves/cylcompressiongearboxkerb / gross0–100 / top speed
2.8 MT (261 Nm)135 @ 4000261 @ 2000222Manual 51850 / 2920 kg15.7 s / 150 km/h
2.8 AT (261 Nm)135 @ 4000261 @ 2000222Automatic 4not measured / 2920 kgnot measured / not measured
2.8 AT (260 Nm)135 @ 4000260 @ 2000421.8Automatic 42080 kg / not measurednot measured / not measured
2.8 MT (260 Nm)135 @ 4000260 @ 2000421.8Manual 52070 kg / not measurednot measured / not measured

Same 135 hp and 2825 cm³ on all four. The 261 Nm pair has Independent, spring front and rear, Ventilated disc front, Disc rear. The 260 Nm pair has Dependent, spring front and rear, Ventilated disc front, Disc ventilated rear, and 220–230 kg more kerb than the 1850 kg 2.8 MT (261 Nm). Fuel: Diesel. Drive: AWD.

5 generation Diesel, 2953 cm³, 4 cylinders, Inline, 4 valves/cyl, Turbo, Front, longitudinal, compression 17.9

Versionhp @ rpmNm @ rpmgearboxkerb / gross
3.0 AT (334 Nm)170 @ 3600334 @ 1800Automatic 4not measured / not measured
3.0 MT170 @ 3600334 @ 1800Manual 5not measured / not measured
3.0 AT (353 Nm)170 @ 3600353 @ 1800Automatic 42130 / 2405 kg

All three: 170 hp, Diesel, AWD. The 353 Nm 3.0 AT is +19 Nm versus the 334 Nm 3.0 AT at the same 1800 rpm. 0–100, top speed, consumption: not measured on all three.

5 generation Diesel, 4169 cm³, 6 cylinders, Inline, 4 valves/cyl, Turbo, Front, longitudinal, compression 22.8

Heaviest measured kerbs in 5 generation. 0–100, top speed, consumption: not measured. Fuel Diesel, AWD, clearance 215 mm, tank 95 l.

5 generation Gasoline

4 generation Diesel 2.8, 2825 cm³, 6 cylinders, Inline, 2 valves/cyl, Turbo, 125 hp @ 4400, 255 Nm @ 2400, compression 22, tank 95 l, gross 2300 kg, clearance 220 mm

4 generation Diesel 4.2, 4169 cm³, 6 cylinders, Inline, AWD, clearance 220 mm — six Diesel 4.2 MT / 4.2 AT rows plus two Gasoline 4.2 rows. Distinguish them:

VersionhpNmboostvalves/cyltankkerb / grossengine position
4.2 AT (125 hp, 273 Nm)125 @ 4000273 @ 2000No295 lnot measured / 2300 kgnot measured
4.2 MT (125 hp, 273 Nm)125 @ 4000273 @ 2000No295 lnot measured / 2300 kgnot measured
4.2 AT (145 hp)145 @ 4000331 @ 2000Turbo295 lnot measured / 2300 kgnot measured
4.2 MT (145 hp, 95 l tank)145 @ 4000331 @ 2000Turbo295 lnot measured / 2300 kgnot measured
4.2 MT (125 hp, 272 Nm)125 @ 4000272 @ 2000No480 l2090 kg / not measuredFront, transverse
4.2 AT (125 hp, 272 Nm)125 @ 4000272 @ 2000No480 l2060 kg / not measuredFront, transverse
4.2 MT (145 hp, 80 l tank)145 @ 4000331 @ 2000Turbo280 lnot measured / 2300 kgnot measured
4.2 AT (145 hp, 80 l tank)145 @ 4000331 @ 2000Turbo280 lnot measured / 2300 kgnot measured
4.2 MT (175 hp, Gasoline)175 @ 4200320 @ 3200Nonot measured80 lnot measured / 2300 kgnot measured
4.2 AT (175 hp, Gasoline)175 @ 4200320 @ 3200Nonot measured80 lnot measured / 2300 kgnot measured

The 175 hp pair is Gasoline, fuel 92, Distributed injection (multi-point). All other 4 generation 4.2 rows are Diesel.

Horsepower, litres, and kg per hp (arithmetic on the catalogue)

Power per litre (hp ÷ displacement in litres):

Kerb kg per hp, only where kerb is measured:

The 5 generation 4.2 Diesel is not “more engine for free”: it is 25 hp below the 5 generation 3.0 (160 vs 170) despite 1216 cm³ more displacement, and 79 hp below 4.8 AT. Torque on 5 generation 4.2 MT is 330 Nm versus 334 Nm on 3.0 MT and 353 Nm on 3.0 AT (353 Nm). The 4.2 Diesel’s measured kerb (2360–2390 kg) is 230–260 kg above 3.0 AT (353 Nm) at 2130 kg.

Performance and mpg: what is measured, what is not

0–100 km/h is measured on two rows only. 4.8 AT (5 generation) is 13.7 s and 160 km/h. 2.8 MT (135 hp, 261 Nm, 5 generation) is 15.7 s and 150 km/h. The gap is 2.0 s and 10 km/h, for +110 hp and +139 Nm (400 vs 261), on a kerb 340 kg higher (2190 vs 1850).

On 2.8 AT, both 3.0 versions, both 5 generation 4.2 versions, 4.5 AT, and every 4 generation version, 0–100 km/h is not measured and top speed is not measured.

Fuel consumption (city, highway, mixed) is not measured on all 23 versions. A Nissan Safari mpg or fuel-economy comparison cannot be done from this catalogue: the cells are empty, not zero. CO2 is not measured. Eco class is not measured.

Dimensions, weight, tank, clearance

Body type does not choose the version: SUV 3-doors on both generations.

Ground clearance: 220 mm on all 12 of 4 generation; 215 mm on 10 of 11 in 5 generation; 225 mm on 5 generation 4.8 AT only. Buying 5 generation 4.8 AT is the only way in this data to gain clearance versus 4 generation (+5 mm). Every other 5 generation row is −5 mm versus 4 generation.

Tank: 95 l on all 11 of 5 generation and on 4 generation 2.8 MT, 2.8 AT, 4.2 AT (125 hp 273 Nm), 4.2 MT (125 hp 273 Nm), 4.2 AT (145 hp, 95 l), 4.2 MT (145 hp, 95 l). 80 l on 4 generation 4.2 MT (125 hp 272 Nm), 4.2 AT (125 hp 272 Nm), 4.2 MT (145 hp, 80 l), 4.2 AT (145 hp, 80 l), and both Gasoline 4.2 rows. The 15 l gap is 18.8% of the 80 l tank. Wheel size: not measured on every version.

Payload where both kerb and gross exist:

4 generation gross 2300 kg with kerb not measured on most rows: payload is not measured there. The two 4 generation rows with kerb (4.2 MT / 4.2 AT 125 hp 272 Nm) have gross not measured, so payload is not measured.

Which version to choose

If the question is maximum power and the only measured sprint. 5 generation 4.8 AT: 245 hp, 400 Nm, Automatic 5, Gasoline, fuel 95, 13.7 s, 160 km/h, 2190 kg, 8.9 kg/hp, 225 mm clearance, 95 l tank, AWD. It is +45 hp versus 4.5 AT and +70 hp versus 4 generation Gasoline 4.2 AT / 4.2 MT (175 hp). It is the only 5-speed Automatic in the whole catalogue. Consumption is still not measured.

If the question is Gasoline without the 4.8’s extra 281 cm³. 5 generation 4.5 AT: 200 hp, 348 Nm, Automatic 4, fuel 92, boost No, 2250 kg. Versus 4.8 AT you give up 45 hp, 52 Nm, 10 mm of clearance (215 vs 225), the fifth Automatic ratio, the only measured 0–100 on a Gasoline row, and you keep a 92 fuel label instead of 95. Versus 4 generation 4.2 AT (175 hp, Gasoline) you gain 25 hp and 28 Nm and a 95 l tank instead of 80 l.

If the question is Diesel with the highest hp per litre. 5 generation 3.0 MT or 3.0 AT (334 Nm): 170 hp from 2953 cm³ (57.6 hp/l), 334 Nm @ 1800, 4 cylinders, Inline, Turbo. Manual 5 versus Automatic 4 is the gearbox split; power and torque match. 0–100 not measured. If the Automatic must have the extra torque, take 3.0 AT (353 Nm): same 170 hp, +19 Nm, kerb 2130 kg, gross 2405 kg, payload 275 kg. That payload is 795 kg below 2.8 MT (261 Nm). Do not pick 5 generation 4.2 MT / 4.2 AT expecting more Diesel power: 160 hp is 10 hp below the 3.0, 38.4 hp/l versus 57.6, and kerb 2360–2390 kg versus 2130 kg on 3.0 AT (353 Nm).

If the question is lightest Diesel and the only measured Diesel sprint. 5 generation 2.8 MT (261 Nm, 2 valves/cyl): 135 hp, 261 Nm, 1850 kg, 15.7 s, 150 km/h, 1070 kg payload, Independent, spring both ends, tank 95 l. Same power as the other 5 generation 2.8 rows, but 220 kg lighter than 2.8 MT (260 Nm, 2070 kg) and 230 kg lighter than 2.8 AT (260 Nm, 2080 kg). 2.8 AT (261 Nm) matches the 261 Nm engine and Independent, spring layout with Automatic 4; kerb is not measured, 0–100 is not measured.

If the question is 4 generation and Turbo Diesel 4.2. 4.2 MT (145 hp) or 4.2 AT (145 hp), then pick tank: 95 l versus 80 l. Same 145 hp, 331 Nm, Turbo, 2 valves/cyl. Versus the 125 hp non-turbo 4.2 MT / 4.2 AT that is +20 hp and +58 Nm (331 vs 273) on the 95 l pair, or +20 hp and +59 Nm (331 vs 272) on the 80 l pair. Versus 5 generation 4.2 MT you give up 15 hp (145 vs 160) and you keep 220 mm clearance versus 215 mm.

If the question is 4 generation 2.8 Diesel. 2.8 MT or 2.8 AT, 125 hp, 255 Nm, Turbo, tank 95 l, clearance 220 mm. Versus 5 generation 2.8 MT (261 Nm) that is −10 hp, −6 Nm, and 0–100 not measured versus 15.7 s. The 5 generation 2.8 is the newer 135 hp row; the 4 generation 2.8 is the 125 hp row with 5 mm more clearance.

If the question is 4 generation Gasoline. 4.2 MT (175 hp) or 4.2 AT (175 hp): 175 hp, 320 Nm, boost No, fuel 92, tank 80 l, gross 2300 kg, clearance 220 mm. Valves per cylinder, compression, bore × stroke, kerb, 0–100, top speed: not measured. It is 25 hp below 5 generation 4.5 AT and 70 hp below 4.8 AT, with a 15 l smaller tank than every 5 generation row.

What the “bigger” displacement does not buy. 4 generation Diesel 4.2 at 125 hp matches 4 generation 2.8 at 125 hp on power and loses on hp/l (30.0 vs 44.2). 5 generation Diesel 4.2 at 160 hp loses to 5 generation 3.0 at 170 hp on power, torque (330 vs 334 or 353), hp/l, and measured kerb. Turbo on 4 generation 4.2 (145 hp) versus No on 4 generation 4.2 (125 hp) is the 20 hp / ~58 Nm step that actually shows up in the table.

Reliability / problems. The catalogue does not measure failure rates, oil capacity, engine mounts, or service life. Those searches have no numbers here; they are not measured.

Safari vs Patrol / Land Cruiser. This file is Nissan Safari only. No Patrol or Land Cruiser figures are in the data, so those comparisons are not measured.

Pick by the row name plus the horsepower (and, where the name still collides, torque, tank, or valves). The 23 versions are not 23 unique badges: they are a small set of displacements with gearbox, boost, and kerb as the real forks.