Nissan Latio: Which Version Should You Buy?
The choice between the Nissan Latio versions in this catalogue is unusually narrow: both are 1.2 CVT Sedan models with 79 hp, 106 Nm, Gasoline engines, Variable gearboxes, and FWD. The earlier version was produced from October 2012 through September 2014, while the restyled version ran from October 2014 through December 2016.
The choice between the Nissan Latio versions in this catalogue is unusually narrow: both are 1.2 CVT Sedan models with 79 hp, 106 Nm, Gasoline engines, Variable gearboxes, and FWD. The earlier version was produced from October 2012 through September 2014, while the restyled version ran from October 2014 through December 2016. Their listed weights, ground clearance, fuel tanks, suspension, and brakes are identical. The only numerical specification change is engine displacement: 1195 cc in the earlier car and 1198 cc after the restyling. Because the data includes no prices, equipment lists, reliability results, or feature changes, it does not support paying more for either version on specifications alone.
Nissan Latio generations and restyling
The catalogue contains one Nissan Latio generation in two production phases, not two separate generations.
The original 1 generation was produced from October 2012 through September 2014. It has a Sedan body and one listed version, named exactly 1.2 CVT. Its engine develops 79 hp at 6000 rpm and 106 Nm at 4400 rpm from 1195 cc.
The 1 generation, restyling followed from October 2014 through December 2016. It remains a Sedan and also has one listed version, again named exactly 1.2 CVT. Output stays at 79 hp at 6000 rpm and 106 Nm at 4400 rpm, while displacement is listed as 1198 cc.
This means searches for a Nissan Latio 2012, Nissan Latio 2013, or Nissan Latio 2014 may lead to the original production phase, depending on the exact production date. A Nissan Latio 2015 or Nissan Latio 2016 falls within the restyled phase in this catalogue. No Hatchback version is present in the supplied data.
Nissan Latio specs and engine comparison
| Production phase and version | Power | Torque | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 generation — 1.2 CVT | 79 hp at 6000 rpm | 106 Nm at 4400 rpm | 1195 cc | Gasoline, 92 | 3 | Inline | No | Variable | FWD |
| 1 generation, restyling — 1.2 CVT | 79 hp at 6000 rpm | 106 Nm at 4400 rpm | 1198 cc | Gasoline, 92 | 3 | Inline | No | Variable | FWD |
Both engines are front-mounted and transverse, use distributed injection (multi-point), and have 4 valves per cylinder. Both also share a bore and stroke of 78 × 83.6. Compression ratio is not measured for either version.
The earlier 1.2 CVT produces approximately 66.1 hp per litre, calculated from 79 hp and 1195 cc. The restyled 1.2 CVT produces approximately 65.9 hp per litre from 79 hp and 1198 cc. The earlier engine therefore has about 0.2 hp per litre more specific output, but this is an arithmetic consequence of a displacement difference of only 3 cc; rated power and torque are unchanged.
Neither version is a Nissan Latio 1.6. The only Nissan Latio engine capacity represented here is 1195 cc before the restyling and 1198 cc after it. Engine oil capacity, engine oil type, engine mounting details, engine-bay information, and engine-number location are not measured.
Nissan Latio performance, mpg, and economy
There is no measured performance advantage for either 1.2 CVT. Both have 79 hp, 106 Nm, a Variable gearbox, and FWD.
| Production phase and version | 0–100 km/h | Top speed | City consumption | Highway consumption | Combined consumption | CO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 generation — 1.2 CVT | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| 1 generation, restyling — 1.2 CVT | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
Fuel economy and mpg cannot be compared because city, highway, and combined consumption are not measured for either version. The environmental class is also not measured. Any claim that one production phase accelerates faster, reaches a higher speed, or uses less fuel would therefore go beyond the available data.
Nissan Latio weight, dimensions, and chassis
Both versions have a kerb weight of 1030 kg. With 79 hp, each carries approximately 13.0 kg per horsepower. Because power and kerb weight are identical, neither version has a calculated power-to-weight advantage.
| Production phase and version | Kerb weight | Gross weight | Ground clearance | Fuel tank | Wheel sizes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 generation — 1.2 CVT | 1030 kg | not measured | 155 mm | 41 L | not measured |
| 1 generation, restyling — 1.2 CVT | 1030 kg | not measured | 155 mm | 41 L | not measured |
Overall length, width, height, and wheelbase are not measured, so a complete Nissan Latio dimensions comparison is not possible from this catalogue. Gross weight and wheel sizes are likewise not measured.
The chassis specifications do not distinguish the two cars. Each 1.2 CVT has Independent, spring front suspension and Semi-independent rear suspension. Each uses Ventilated disc front brakes and Drum rear brakes. Ground clearance remains 155 mm, while tank capacity remains 41 L.
Nissan Latio reliability and problems
Reliability records and reported problems are not measured in the supplied data. There are no service histories, failure rates, repair costs, or component revisions from which to rank the original and restyled cars. The data also does not establish whether the restyling altered equipment, safety systems, cabin features, exterior details, or maintenance requirements.
Accordingly, the later production dates should not be treated as proof of greater reliability. Condition, maintenance history, and price could matter to a purchase, but none of those factors is included here and no price comparison can be made.
Which Nissan Latio 1.2 CVT should you buy?
Choose the original 1.2 CVT from the 1 generation if it costs less in an actual buying comparison and is otherwise equivalent. On the recorded specifications, it gives the same 79 hp, 106 Nm, 1030 kg kerb weight, 155 mm clearance, and 41 L tank as the restyled car. Its 1195 cc engine is 3 cc smaller and has approximately 0.2 hp per litre more specific output, but that does not produce a listed advantage in rated power or torque.
Choose the restyled 1.2 CVT if you specifically want a car from the October 2014–December 2016 production phase. What the supplied figures confirm is a 1198 cc engine rather than 1195 cc. They do not confirm additional horsepower, torque, reduced weight, greater clearance, a larger tank, different drive, or different brakes and suspension.
In short, the catalogue numbers produce a technical tie. The original and restyled 1.2 CVT have the same output, torque, transmission, drive system, kerb weight, clearance, and tank capacity. Since price, equipment, economy, performance, reliability, and condition are not measured, the data provides no numerical reason to pay extra for the restyled version.