Generations: what changed, and what did not
Displacement, cylinders, cylinder layout, and boost are not measured for either version. Fuel is Electro. Gearbox is Automatic with 1 speed. Drive is AWD.
1 generation (from 2022-06-01, production open). Body: SUV 5-doors. Versions in the catalogue: 2. No restyling is recorded. Both AT 75 kWh and AT 100 kWh start on 2022-06-01 and have no stop date. Generation-to-generation arithmetic is not possible: there is only this generation. The choice is inside one body, one drivetrain layout, and one power rating.
Specs and engine: AT 75 kWh vs AT 100 kWh
Displacement, cylinders, cylinder layout, and boost are not measured for either version. Fuel is Electro. Gearbox is Automatic with 1 speed. Drive is AWD.
| Version | hp | kW | Nm | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Speeds | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT 75 kWh | 653 | 480 | 850 | not measured | Electro | not measured | not measured | not measured | Automatic | 1 | AWD |
| AT 100 kWh | 653 | 480 | 866 | not measured | Electro | not measured | not measured | not measured | Automatic | 1 | AWD |
Power is identical: 653 hp and 480 kW on both. Torque is not: AT 100 kWh has 866 Nm, AT 75 kWh has 850 Nm — 16 Nm more, about 1.9%. Power per litre cannot be calculated: displacement is not measured. The version names carry the battery labels (75 kWh vs 100 kWh); the catalogue does not give a separate measured energy figure beyond those names.
Performance, mpg, and 0–100
| Version | 0–100 km/h | Top speed | City | Highway | Combined | CO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT 75 kWh | 3.9 s | 200 km/h | not measured | not measured | not measured | 0 g/km |
| AT 100 kWh | 3.9 s | 200 km/h | not measured | not measured | not measured | 0 g/km |
The extra 16 Nm on AT 100 kWh does not change the recorded sprint or the speed limiter: both are 3.9 s and 200 km/h. Fuel consumption (mpg in the search sense) is not measured for city, highway, or combined on either version — it is not omitted because the car has no energy use; the catalogue simply has no figure. CO2 is 0 g/km on both. Eco class is not measured.
Weight per horsepower, from the measured kerb masses:
- AT 75 kWh: 2346 kg / 653 hp = 3.59 kg per hp
- AT 100 kWh: 2441 kg / 653 hp = 3.74 kg per hp
AT 75 kWh is 0.15 kg/hp lighter for the same 653 hp. AT 100 kWh carries 95 kg more (about 4.0%) for the same acceleration number. Power-to-weight:
- AT 75 kWh: 653 / 2346 = 0.278 hp per kg
- AT 100 kWh: 653 / 2441 = 0.267 hp per kg
On paper, the lighter pack is the denser performer; the catalogue still rates both at 3.9 s.
Dimensions, weight, tank, and wheels
| Version | Kerb weight | Gross weight | Ground clearance | Tank | Wheels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT 75 kWh | 2346 kg | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| AT 100 kWh | 2441 kg | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
Gross weight, ground clearance, tank (not applicable as a fuel tank in the usual sense, and not measured here), and wheel sizes are not measured for either version. The only dimension-class number that splits the pair is kerb weight: AT 100 kWh is 95 kg heavier.
Chassis hardware is the same in the labels: front Independent, pneumatic; rear Independent, pneumatic; front Ventilated disc; rear Disc. No generation change, no restyling, no recorded difference in brakes or suspension type.
Problems and reliability
Problem rates, recalls, battery degradation, and reliability scores are not measured in this dataset. Do not infer them from the 653 hp figure or from the 95 kg gap.
Which version to choose
There is no generation fork. The fork is AT 75 kWh versus AT 100 kWh.
Same on both: 653 hp, 480 kW, Electro, Automatic 1-speed, AWD, SUV 5-doors, 3.9 s, 200 km/h, 0 g/km CO2, Independent pneumatic front and rear, Ventilated disc front, Disc rear, on sale from 2022-06-01 with no stop date. Extra money does not buy more horsepower, a different gearbox, another driven axle, a higher top speed, or a quicker 0–100 in this catalogue.
What the numbers actually buy if you take AT 100 kWh instead of AT 75 kWh:
- +16 Nm (866 vs 850)
- +95 kg kerb (2441 vs 2346)
- worse mass per hp (3.74 vs 3.59 kg/hp)
- the larger pack in the version name (100 kWh vs 75 kWh)
Choose AT 75 kWh if the measured performance is the criterion. It is the lighter car (2346 kg), the better kg-per-hp figure (3.59), and it matches AT 100 kWh on 653 hp, 3.9 s, and 200 km/h. The 16 Nm gap is small relative to 850 Nm. If consumption, range, and wheel size mattered to the decision, they are not measured here — so they cannot be used to reject this version.
Choose AT 100 kWh if the version name’s larger pack and the 866 Nm peak are the criterion. You accept 95 kg extra and 0.15 kg more per horsepower for 16 Nm. You do not get a different 0–100, a different top speed, or a different drive layout. Range and mpg are not measured, so this choice cannot be justified from consumption figures in the catalogue — only from the pack label in the name and the torque line.
Do not wait for another generation on the numbers we have: pokoleniy = 1, stop = null.
Prices are not in the data. “What the extra money buys” here means what the extra specification buys: 16 Nm and 95 kg, against identical power and identical timed performance.
For a buyer who wants the same 653 hp AWD Electro SUV 5-doors with the least recorded mass, AT 75 kWh is the tighter match to the performance sheet. For a buyer who wants the 866 Nm line and the 100 kWh name, AT 100 kWh is the only other version in 1 generation.