Neta GT: which version to buy (specs, engine, dimensions)
The Neta GT has been in production since 2024-01-01, with no end date in the data, as 1 generation, body Coupe, and 1 version. That version is named AT. There is no second engine, no second gearbox, no restyling row, and no generation-to-generation swap.
The Neta GT has been in production since 2024-01-01, with no end date in the data, as 1 generation, body Coupe, and 1 version. That version is named AT. There is no second engine, no second gearbox, no restyling row, and no generation-to-generation swap. Power is 231 hp (169 kW), torque is 310 Nm, fuel is Electro, gearbox is Automatic with 1 speed, drive is RWD, 0–100 is 6.7 s, top speed is 190, CO2 is 0, kerb weight is 1850, gross weight is 2150. Displacement, cylinders, cylinder layout, valves per cylinder, boost, engine placement, feed system, compression, bore and stroke, rpm for power, rpm for torque, city/highway/combined use, tank, eco class, ground clearance, and wheel size are not measured. The rest of this text is arithmetic on those figures and a buyer’s reading of the gaps.
Generations: what changed (and what did not)
1 generation (start 2024-01-01, stop not measured) is the only generation. Body is Coupe. Version count is 1: AT. Restyling is not listed, so there is no “facelift AT” to prefer over a pre-facelift AT. If you are comparing years of the same name, the data do not split 2024 from later years: one start, no stop, one spec sheet.
Because there is no 2nd generation, you cannot buy “the later GT for more power” or “the earlier GT for less weight.” Power does not rise across generations (there is only 231 hp). Weight does not fall (there is only 1850 kerb). Drive does not switch from RWD to something else. Gearbox does not gain extra ratios beyond 1. The generation question collapses to: do you accept a 2024-on Coupe with this AT sheet, or you look at another model entirely.
Engine and specs: the only row is AT
Use the version name exactly as in the database: AT.
| Version | hp | Nm | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Speeds | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT | 231 | 310 | not measured | Electro | not measured | not measured | not measured | Automatic | 1 | RWD |
AT is Electro, not a petrol or diesel row you can rank by litres. Power per litre is not measured, because displacement is not measured: 231 hp with no cubic-centimetre figure cannot be turned into hp/L without inventing a volume. Cylinder count and layout are not measured; do not fill that with a guessed format. Boost is not measured. Engine placement is not measured.
What AT does give as a buy filter: 231 hp and 310 Nm through Automatic 1 and RWD. Relative to itself, torque is 310 ÷ 231 ≈ 1.34 Nm per horsepower. Peak rpm for power and for torque are not measured, so you cannot say where in the rev range that 231 hp or 310 Nm arrives. For an Electro AT, the missing rpm fields are still “not measured,” not a reason to invent a curve.
If two cars in a wider Neta list both said AT, you would split them by horsepower. Here there is only one AT, 231 hp, so no duplicate-name collision.
Performance, mpg, and economy: what AT actually posts
AT 0–100 is 6.7. Top speed is 190. City consumption is not measured. Highway consumption is not measured. Combined consumption is not measured. Tank is not measured. CO2 is 0. Eco class is not measured.
A buyer looking up mpg will not find a measured mpg, L/100 km, or kWh/100 km on this sheet. Saying “efficient” without a consumption number would be a story, not a spec. The only measured environmental figure is CO2 0.
Speed versus the clock: 190 top speed with a 6.7 sprint is the pair you are buying. You cannot pick a “faster AT” because there is no second 0–100. You cannot pick a “higher-speed AT” because there is no second top speed. Arithmetic on the one pair: 190 ÷ 6.7 ≈ 28.4 units of top speed per second of 0–100. That ratio is only a way to keep both numbers in view; it is not a second test result.
Fuel type Electro plus tank not measured means range from a tank size cannot be computed. Do not treat “not measured” tank as zero litres; it is simply not in the data.
Dimensions, weight, and what the extra mass is for
Kerb weight AT: 1850. Gross weight: 2150. Ground clearance: not measured. Wheel sizes: not measured. Tank: not measured.
Payload arithmetic (allowed): 2150 − 1850 = 300. That 300 is the gap between kerb and gross on this sheet, not a measured cargo rating from a brochure. Weight per horsepower: 1850 ÷ 231 ≈ 8.01 kg per hp. Horsepower per tonne of kerb: 231 ÷ 1.850 ≈ 124.9 hp/t. Torque per tonne: 310 ÷ 1.850 ≈ 167.6 Nm/t. Gross-weight power density is lower: 231 ÷ 2.150 ≈ 107.4 hp/t, 310 ÷ 2.150 ≈ 144.2 Nm/t. If you load toward 2150, you are about 300 kg above kerb, which is 300 ÷ 1850 ≈ 16% more mass than the 6.7 / 190 figures were listed against. The 6.7 and 190 are not restated at gross weight; they are the measured performance figures as given, and the extra 300 kg is only a mass delta.
Front suspension AT: Independent, spring. Rear: Independent, spring. Front brakes: Ventilated disc. Rear brakes: Disc (label as in the data). There is no second suspension pack and no second brake pack, so you are not choosing sport springs versus comfort springs inside this model.
Ground clearance not measured means you cannot rank AT as high or low versus another GT generation. Wheel size not measured means you cannot choose “the version with larger wheels” because no size is listed.
Reliability and problems: what this sheet does not prove
Search terms around problems and reliability do not have counts, recall lists, or failure rates in the supplied data. This article therefore does not invent a fault list. What you can say without leaving the numbers: one generation, one AT, production start 2024-01-01, stop not measured. A short calendar from that start is a fact of the date field, not a reliability score. Missing consumption, missing clearance, missing wheels, missing tank, missing cylinder fields are catalogue gaps, not proven defects.
Which version to choose
There is one named version: AT.
Choose AT if 231 hp, 310 Nm, Electro, Automatic 1, RWD, 6.7 to 100, 190 top speed, CO2 0, 1850 kerb, 2150 gross, Coupe, Independent, spring at both ends, Ventilated disc front and Disc rear, from 2024-01-01 with no listed stop, is the set you want.
You cannot choose a higher-hp Neta GT, a lower-weight Neta GT, an AWD Neta GT, a multi-speed Neta GT, or a different fuel Neta GT: those rows are not in the data. Extra money cannot be mapped to extra hp here, because price is not in the data and there is no second spec to buy up into. Power per litre cannot break a tie, because displacement is not measured.
If you need a measured combined figure, a measured tank, a measured clearance, or a measured wheel size, AT does not provide them — they are not measured, not “probably typical.” If you need two body styles, 1 generation only lists Coupe. If you need a later generation with a changed 0–100, it does not exist in this catalogue.
Buyer shorthand on the only row: AT is 231 hp and 310 Nm in 1850 kg, about 8.01 kg/hp, 300 kg from kerb to gross, 6.7 and 190, RWD, Automatic 1, Electro, CO2 0. That is the whole choice set for the Neta GT.