Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: Which Version Should You Buy?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross version to choose depends on whether you prioritize performance, fuel consumption, AWD, or a newer electric powertrain. Among the first-generation models, the quickest measured choice is the 1.5 CVT with 163 hp and 254 Nm: both its FWD and AWD forms reach 100 km/h in 9.7 seconds. The restyled range adds a 2.4 PHEV with AWD and combined consumption of 6.1 l/100 km.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross version to choose depends on whether you prioritize performance, fuel consumption, AWD, or a newer electric powertrain. Among the first-generation models, the quickest measured choice is the 1.5 CVT with 163 hp and 254 Nm: both its FWD and AWD forms reach 100 km/h in 9.7 seconds. The restyled range adds a 2.4 PHEV with AWD and combined consumption of 6.1 l/100 km. The second-generation AT changes the formula completely, using an Electro powertrain with 218 hp, 300 Nm, RWD, and an 8.4-second 0–100 km/h time. Price and reliability cannot be compared because neither is measured in the supplied data.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross generations and versions

The first generation ran from March 2017 through January 2021 as an SUV 5-doors and contains nine listed modifications. Its range includes several 1.5 CVT specifications, two 1.5 MT specifications, and one 2.3 AT diesel. Buyers can choose FWD or AWD depending on the version.

The first-generation restyling ran from December 2020 through January 2026, remained an SUV 5-doors, and contains four modifications. It belongs to the first generation rather than forming a separate generation. The selection consists of three 1.5 CVT listings and a 2.4 PHEV, with FWD and AWD represented.

The second generation began in September 2025 and is also an SUV 5-doors. Its sole listed version is the electric AT with RWD. Across the catalogue, the Eclipse Cross therefore has two generations, with the first generation divided into original and restyled ranges; the supplied model data records these as three entries.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross engine specs and drivetrain comparison

Repeated names below are distinguished by power and drive so that every exact database version name remains identifiable.

Range and exact versionPowerTorqueDisplacementFuelCylinders/layoutBoostGearboxDrive
Original 1.5 CVT, 150 hp FWD150 hp250 Nm1499 ccGasoline4, InlineTurboVariableFWD
Original 1.5 CVT, 150 hp AWD150 hp250 Nm1499 ccGasoline4, InlineTurboVariableAWD
Original 1.5 MT, 150 hp FWD150 hp250 Nm1499 ccGasoline4, InlineTurboManual, 6FWD
Original 1.5 MT, 163 hp FWD163 hp250 Nm1499 ccGasoline4, InlineTurboManual, 6FWD
Original 2.3 AT, 150 hp AWD150 hp400 Nm2268 ccDiesel4, InlineTurboAutomatic, 8AWD
Original 1.5 CVT, 152 hp FWD152 hp250 Nm1499 ccGasoline4, InlineTurboVariableFWD
Original 1.5 CVT, 152 hp AWD152 hp250 Nm1499 ccGasoline4, InlineTurboVariableAWD
Original 1.5 CVT, 163 hp AWD163 hp254 Nm1499 ccGasoline4, InlineTurboVariableAWD
Original 1.5 CVT, 163 hp FWD163 hp254 Nm1499 ccGasoline4, InlineTurboVariableFWD
Restyled 1.5 CVT, 152 hp FWD152 hp240 Nm1499 ccGasoline4, InlineTurboVariableFWD
Restyled 1.5 CVT, 150 hp FWD150 hp240 Nm1499 ccGasoline4, InlineTurboVariableFWD
Restyled 1.5 CVT, 152 hp AWD152 hp254 Nm1499 ccGasoline4, InlineTurboVariableAWD
Restyled 2.4 PHEV, 188 hp AWD188 hp199 Nm2359 ccPlug-in4, Inlinenot measuredAutomaticAWD
Second-generation AT, 218 hp RWD218 hp300 Nmnot measuredElectronot measurednot measuredAutomatic, 1RWD

The original 1.5 MT with 163 hp produces about 108.7 hp per litre, as do the original 163 hp 1.5 CVT versions. The 152 hp 1.5 CVT specifications produce about 101.4 hp per litre, while the 150 hp specifications produce about 100.1 hp per litre. The 2.3 AT diesel produces about 66.1 hp per litre, but its 400 Nm exceeds the original 163 hp 1.5 CVT’s 254 Nm by 146 Nm. The 2.4 PHEV produces about 79.7 hp per litre; power per litre cannot be calculated for the electric AT because displacement is not measured.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross performance and MPG figures

Range and exact version0–100 km/hTop speedCityHighwayCombined
Original 1.5 CVT, 150 hp FWD11.1 s195 km/h9.2 l/100 km6.2 l/100 km7.3 l/100 km
Original 1.5 CVT, 150 hp AWD11.4 s195 km/h9.8 l/100 km6.5 l/100 km7.7 l/100 km
Original 1.5 MT, 150 hp FWD10.3 s200 km/h8.8 l/100 km5.8 l/100 km6.9 l/100 km
Original 1.5 MT, 163 hp FWD10.3 s205 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
Original 2.3 AT, 150 hp AWDnot measurednot measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
Original 1.5 CVT, 152 hp FWDnot measured197 km/hnot measurednot measured8.7 l/100 km
Original 1.5 CVT, 152 hp AWDnot measured197 km/hnot measurednot measured9.0 l/100 km
Original 1.5 CVT, 163 hp AWD9.7 s200 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
Original 1.5 CVT, 163 hp FWD9.7 s200 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
Restyled 1.5 CVT, 152 hp FWDnot measured190 km/h9.4 l/100 km6.8 l/100 km7.5 l/100 km
Restyled 1.5 CVT, 150 hp FWDnot measured190 km/h9.4 l/100 km6.8 l/100 km7.5 l/100 km
Restyled 1.5 CVT, 152 hp AWD9.4 s190 km/h10.2 l/100 km7.2 l/100 km8.1 l/100 km
Restyled 2.4 PHEV, 188 hp AWD10.9 s162 km/h6.4 l/100 km6.0 l/100 km6.1 l/100 km
Second-generation AT, 218 hp RWD8.4 s170 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured

For the original 150 hp 1.5 CVT, choosing AWD adds 0.3 seconds to the 0–100 km/h result and raises combined consumption by 0.4 l/100 km compared with FWD. The 150 hp 1.5 MT is 0.8 seconds quicker than the comparable 150 hp FWD 1.5 CVT, reaches a top speed 5 km/h higher, and uses 0.4 l/100 km less on the combined cycle.

Within the restyled range, the 152 hp AWD 1.5 CVT consumes 0.6 l/100 km more combined than either FWD 1.5 CVT listing. The 2.4 PHEV uses 2.0 l/100 km less combined than the restyled AWD 1.5 CVT, although its 10.9-second acceleration is 1.5 seconds slower. The second-generation AT is 1.0 second quicker than the restyled AWD 1.5 CVT and 1.3 seconds quicker than either original 163 hp 1.5 CVT. Its energy-consumption figure is not measured, so an MPG comparison with combustion versions is not possible.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross dimensions, weight, clearance, tank and wheels

Overall exterior dimensions are not measured in the supplied data. Kerb weight, gross weight, ground clearance, tank capacity, and wheel sizes are available for some versions.

Range and exact versionKerb weightGross weightClearanceTankWheels
Original 1.5 CVT, 150 hp FWD1535 kgnot measured183 mm63 lnot measured
Original 1.5 CVT, 150 hp AWD1600 kgnot measured183 mm63 lnot measured
Original 1.5 MT, 150 hp FWD1505 kgnot measured183 mm63 lnot measured
Original 1.5 MT, 163 hp FWD1425 kgnot measured183 mm63 l215/70 R16; 225/55 R18
Original 2.3 AT, 150 hp AWD1660 kgnot measured183 mm63 l215/70 R16; 225/55 R18
Original 1.5 CVT, 152 hp FWDnot measurednot measured183 mm63 lnot measured
Original 1.5 CVT, 152 hp AWDnot measurednot measured183 mm63 lnot measured
Original 1.5 CVT, 163 hp AWD1495 kg2150 kg183 mm63 l215/70 R16; 225/55 R18
Original 1.5 CVT, 163 hp FWD1495 kg2150 kg183 mm63 lnot measured
Restyled 1.5 CVT, 152 hp FWD1480 kgnot measured204 mm63 lnot measured
Restyled 1.5 CVT, 150 hp FWD1480 kgnot measured204 mm63 lnot measured
Restyled 1.5 CVT, 152 hp AWD1550 kgnot measured204 mm63 lnot measured
Restyled 2.4 PHEV, 188 hp AWD1985 kg2425 kg204 mm43 lnot measured
Second-generation AT, 218 hp RWDnot measurednot measurednot measurednot measurednot measured

The restyled combustion versions increase ground clearance by 21 mm over the original range. Restyled AWD adds 70 kg over either restyled FWD 1.5 CVT. The original 150 hp AWD 1.5 CVT is 65 kg heavier than its FWD counterpart, while the 150 hp 1.5 MT is 30 kg lighter than that FWD CVT.

Among versions with measured kerb weight, the original 163 hp 1.5 MT has the strongest weight-to-power result at about 8.7 kg per hp. The original 163 hp 1.5 CVT versions are about 9.2 kg per hp, the restyled AWD 1.5 CVT is about 10.2 kg per hp, and the 2.4 PHEV is about 10.6 kg per hp. The electric AT cannot be compared by this measure because its kerb weight is not measured.

Which Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross version should you buy?

Choose the original 1.5 MT with 150 hp if measured fuel economy is the priority among the original gasoline versions. Its combined figure is 6.9 l/100 km, compared with 7.3 l/100 km for the 150 hp FWD 1.5 CVT and 7.7 l/100 km for the 150 hp AWD 1.5 CVT. It also reaches 100 km/h in 10.3 seconds.

Choose an original 1.5 CVT with 163 hp and 254 Nm if you want the quickest measured original-generation configuration. Both the FWD and AWD listings reach 100 km/h in 9.7 seconds. The measured kerb weight is identical at 1495 kg, so the supplied figures do not establish a weight penalty for AWD in this pairing.

Choose the original 1.5 MT with 163 hp if top speed and weight-to-power ratio matter most. Its 205 km/h maximum is the highest measured figure in the catalogue, and its 1425 kg kerb weight gives about 8.7 kg per hp. However, its fuel consumption is not measured.

Choose the original 2.3 AT if the largest measured torque figure is the deciding factor. Its Diesel engine supplies 400 Nm, paired with AWD and an Automatic gearbox with 8 ratios. Acceleration, top speed, and fuel consumption are all not measured, so its torque advantage cannot be converted into a verified performance or economy advantage.

Choose the restyled 152 hp AWD 1.5 CVT if you want AWD, 204 mm of clearance, and the quickest measured first-generation result. Its 9.4-second 0–100 km/h time is 0.3 seconds better than the original 163 hp CVT versions, although combined consumption is 8.1 l/100 km.

Choose the 2.4 PHEV if the lowest measured combined fuel figure is more important than acceleration. It records 6.1 l/100 km, has AWD and 204 mm of clearance, but weighs 1985 kg and reaches 100 km/h in 10.9 seconds. Its 43-litre tank is 20 litres smaller than the tanks of the listed gasoline and diesel versions.

Choose the second-generation AT if outright measured acceleration and power lead the decision. Its Electro powertrain delivers 218 hp and 300 Nm, driving the rear wheels through an Automatic gearbox with 1 ratio. It reaches 100 km/h in 8.4 seconds and 170 km/h at maximum speed. Its consumption, weight, clearance, and wheel dimensions are not measured, so those factors cannot yet be compared from this catalogue.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross price, reliability, engine problems, engine-oil capacity, and gas-tank opening procedure are not measured in the supplied data. None should be used to rank these versions without an additional verified source.