Marvel R specs: two AT versions, one generation
There is no second generation to wait for in this dataset: pokoleniy is 1, body SUV 5-doors, 2 versions, both AT, both from 2021-08-01, both still listed with stop not measured. A restyle is not measured. Choosing “which generation” is not a choice here; choosing which AT is.
There is no second generation to wait for in this dataset: pokoleniy is 1, body SUV 5-doors, 2 versions, both AT, both from 2021-08-01, both still listed with stop not measured. A restyle is not measured. Choosing “which generation” is not a choice here; choosing which AT is.
| Version | hp | kW | Nm | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Gears | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT (288 hp) | 288 | 211 | 665 | not measured | Electro | not measured | not measured | not measured | Automatic | 1 | AWD |
| AT (180 hp) | 180 | 132 | 418 | not measured | Electro | not measured | not measured | not measured | Automatic | 1 | RWD |
Power per litre is not measured on both AT versions because displacement is not measured. Do not invent a petrol, diesel or hybrid layout: tip_dvigatelya_en is Electro and toplivo_en is Electro.
Engine and power: what the extra 108 hp buys
The AT 288 hp makes 108 hp more than the AT 180 hp (288 − 180). In kilowatts that is 79 kW (211 − 132). Torque is 247 Nm higher (665 − 418). Relative to the weaker AT, the stronger one has about 1.60× the horsepower (288 / 180) and about 1.59× the torque (665 / 418).
That extra output is not a larger piston engine in this table: displacement, cylinders, cylinder layout, valves, boost, intake system, compression and bore/stroke are not measured on both AT versions. The measured split is electric output and drive: AWD on 288 hp, RWD on 180 hp. Gearbox is the same label on both: Automatic, 1 gear. You are not buying extra ratios; you are buying 108 hp, 247 Nm and AWD versus RWD.
If the decision is “do I need the stronger AT,” the arithmetic is blunt: 180 hp and 418 Nm are the floor; 288 hp and 665 Nm are the ceiling in this generation. There is no third AT.
Performance: 4.9 s versus 7.9 s, same 200 top speed
0–100 is 4.9 s on the AT 288 hp AWD and 7.9 s on the AT 180 hp RWD. The gap is 3.0 s (7.9 − 4.9). The quicker AT reaches 100 in about 62% of the time of the slower one (4.9 / 7.9).
Top speed is 200 on both AT versions. The extra 108 hp does not raise the listed maximum. If your use case is a higher listed top speed, neither AT wins; they match. If your use case is a shorter 0–100, the 288 hp AT is the one with the 3.0 s advantage.
Fuel consumption city, highway and combined is not measured on both AT versions. Tank capacity is not measured on both. CO2 is 0 on both. There is no mpg ranking in this dataset: you cannot pick the “more economical AT” by a measured litre figure. The only measured emissions figure is CO2 0 for the AT 288 hp and CO2 0 for the AT 180 hp. Eco class is not measured on both.
Weight, clearance, payload: the 110 kg AWD penalty
| Version | Kerb | Gross | Payload (gross − kerb) | Ground clearance | Tank | Wheels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT (288 hp, AWD) | 1995 | 2373 | 378 | 180 | not measured | not measured |
| AT (180 hp, RWD) | 1885 | 2288 | 403 | 180 | not measured | not measured |
The AT 288 hp kerb 1995 kg is 110 kg heavier than the AT 180 hp kerb 1885 kg. Gross is 85 kg higher (2373 − 2288). Payload is 378 kg on the heavier AT (2373 − 1995) versus 403 kg on the lighter AT (2288 − 1885). The RWD AT therefore lists 25 kg more payload (403 − 378) despite 108 hp less.
Weight per horsepower: 1995 / 288 ≈ 6.93 kg per hp on the AT 288 hp; 1885 / 180 ≈ 10.47 kg per hp on the AT 180 hp. The stronger AT carries about 3.54 kg less per hp (10.47 − 6.93). That matches the 3.0 s 0–100 gap better than the raw kerb gap of 110 kg.
Ground clearance is 180 mm on both AT versions. You do not buy extra listed height by taking AWD. Wheel sizes are not measured on both. Front suspension is Independent, spring on both; rear is Independent, spring on both. Front brakes are Ventilated disc on both; rear brakes are Disc on both (label as in the data). Chassis labels do not separate the two AT versions; mass, drive and output do.
Dimensions and reliability searches: what is not measured
Problems, reliability, battery kWh, range, charging, boot, length, width, height, wheelbase and tyre sizes are not measured in this dataset. A buyer article cannot rank the two AT versions on those topics without inventing numbers. What is measured for a buy decision is power, torque, 0–100, top speed, drive, kerb, gross, clearance, CO2, gearbox type and the shared SUV 5-doors body.
Which MG Marvel R AT to choose
Choose the AT 288 hp (AWD) when:
- You want the only AWD AT in this generation.
- You want 288 hp / 211 kW / 665 Nm, not 180 hp / 132 kW / 418 Nm.
- You want 4.9 s to 100, not 7.9 s (3.0 s quicker).
- You accept 1995 kg kerb versus 1885 kg (110 kg more) and 378 kg payload versus 403 kg (25 kg less).
- You want the lower kg-per-hp figure (≈ 6.93 versus ≈ 10.47).
Choose the AT 180 hp (RWD) when:
- RWD is enough; you do not need the AWD AT.
- 180 hp and 418 Nm cover the job; you will not use the extra 108 hp and 247 Nm.
- 7.9 s to 100 is acceptable; you are not paying (in mass) for 4.9 s.
- You want the lighter AT: 1885 kg kerb, 2288 kg gross, 403 kg payload.
- You want the same listed 200 top speed and 180 mm clearance without the 110 kg kerb add.
Do not choose on these, because they do not separate the two AT versions: body (SUV 5-doors), generation count (1), start date (2021-08-01), fuel (Electro), gearbox (Automatic, 1), top speed (200), CO2 (0), clearance (180), suspension (Independent, spring front and rear), brakes (Ventilated disc front, Disc rear). Displacement, consumption, tank, wheels, cylinders, layout and boost are not measured on both, so they are not a tie-breaker.
There is no later generation in the data that “fixed” one AT or the other. The buy is inside generation 1: AT 288 hp AWD versus AT 180 hp RWD. If the 3.0 s, 108 hp, 247 Nm and AWD are the point of an MG Marvel R SUV 5-doors, the 288 hp AT is the version that holds those numbers. If the point is the lighter Electro AT with more payload and RWD, the 180 hp AT is the version that holds 1885 kg, 403 kg payload and 7.9 s.