KTM X-Bow

Which version to buy: KTM X-Bow 2.0 MT

There is no second power figure, no automatic, no AWD, no restyle line with a different name. “Which version” therefore collapses to: take 2.0 MT if these ratios work, or do not take the model.

2.0 MT is the only modification in the data. It is a Speedster, Gasoline, Turbo, 4 Inline cylinders, 1984 cm³, 240 hp (177 kW), 310 Nm at 2000 rpm, Manual 6, RWD. Kerb weight is 790 kg. 0–100 is 3.9 s; top speed is 220 km/h. Ground clearance is 110 mm.

There is no second power figure, no automatic, no AWD, no restyle line with a different name. “Which version” therefore collapses to: take 2.0 MT if these ratios work, or do not take the model.

What 2.0 MT actually buys (arithmetic on the given numbers)

• Power per litre: 240 hp / 1.984 L = 121.0 hp per litre.
• Torque per litre: 310 Nm / 1.984 L = 156.2 Nm per litre.
• Kerb mass per horsepower: 790 / 240 = 3.29 kg per hp.
• Power per tonne (kerb): 240 / 0.790 = 304 hp per tonne.
• Peak torque vs peak power: 310 Nm arrives at 2000 rpm; 240 hp is listed without an rpm. The torque figure is the one with a measured engine speed.
• Speed vs sprint: 3.9 s to 100 km/h versus 220 km/h Vmax. The gap is the buying filter: the car is specified for a short sprint, not a high top-speed number.

No extra-money comparison exists inside the model: there is no higher-hp 2.0 MT, no second displacement, no extra gears. The “upgrade” is not in this catalogue.

Generations: what changed (and what did not)

1 generation starts 2007-01-01. stop is empty, so production end is not measured. Body for the generation: Speedster. Versions in the generation: 1.

There is no second generation in the data, so there is no generation-to-generation change in hp, kg, or seconds. A restyle is not listed as a separate generation and is not listed at all. Anyone shopping “new gen vs old gen” X-Bow has only 1 generation to compare against itself.

Specs of the only version (engine, gearbox, drive)

Injection on 2.0 MT: Distributed injection (multi-point). Fuel grade: 95. Valves per cylinder: not measured. Compression ratio: not measured. Bore × stroke: not measured. Engine position: not measured.

If a listing uses another name than 2.0 MT, it is not this catalogue row.

Performance and mpg: measured vs not measured

2.0 MT 0–100: 3.9 s. 2.0 MT top speed: 220 km/h.

Fuel use on 2.0 MT: city not measured, highway not measured, combined not measured. CO₂ not measured. Eco class not measured. Tank volume not measured.

A buyer who ranks cars by mpg or by a WLTP/NEDC number cannot rank 2.0 MT on this page. The economy columns are empty, not zero. Do not treat missing mpg as “no fuel used.”

Sprint vs mass: 790 kg and 3.9 s sit together. Without a second version there is no “plus 50 hp, minus 0.x s” trade. The only measured acceleration is 3.9 s for 2.0 MT.

Dimensions, weight, clearance (what you can check on a real car)

• Kerb weight 2.0 MT: 790 kg.
• Gross vehicle weight: not measured. Payload is therefore not measured (gross minus kerb needs both numbers).
• Ground clearance: 110 mm.
• Wheel sizes: not measured.
• Fuel tank: not measured. Range from tank × mpg is not measured because both inputs are missing.

Front suspension 2.0 MT: Independent, spring. Rear suspension: not measured. Front brakes: Ventilated disc. Rear brakes: not measured.

110 mm clearance vs a typical road Speedster use: the number is low in absolute millimetres. Without a second X-Bow generation there is no “later cars gained clearance” claim. The buyer either accepts 110 mm or looks outside this model.

Which generation, which 2.0 MT — there is no fork

Compare versions with the names in the database:

1. 2.0 MT (240 hp, 310 Nm, 1984 cm³, Manual 6, RWD, 790 kg, 3.9 s, 220 km/h, 110 mm). That is the full set.

There are not two 2.0 MT rows with different horsepower. Do not invent a 240 vs 240+ split.

Buy 2.0 MT if the use case is a Speedster with RWD, a 6-speed Manual, Turbo Gasoline 4 Inline, 121.0 hp/L, 3.29 kg/hp, and a measured 3.9 s / 220 km/h pair.

Do not treat 2.0 MT as a family of trims. Economy, tank, wheels, gross weight, rear axle hardware, and eco class are not measured. Those are not reasons to pick a “higher” X-Bow in this table; they are gaps in the sheet.

Do not wait for a later generation in this catalogue. pokoleniy is 1. Years: from 2007, end not measured. Body count: one type, Speedster. Modification count: 1.

Reliability, problems, running costs — what this data does and does not say

Search queries about X-Bow problems and reliability cannot be answered with failure rates from this file. The file has no defect counts, no service intervals, no oil volumes.

What can be stated without leaving the numbers:

• Turbo plus Distributed injection (multi-point) plus fuel 95 is the stated powertrain of 2.0 MT.
• Manual 6 and RWD are the only transmission and drive combination. There is no automatic alternative if clutch or shifter wear is a concern.
• 790 kg kerb is the mass the 240 hp and Ventilated disc front brakes are specified with. Rear brake type is not measured, so a “front vs rear brake” comparison inside the car is incomplete.
• With mpg not measured, a running-cost model that starts from litres/100 km cannot be filled from this article.

Short buyer checklist against 2.0 MT

The extra money, in this catalogue, does not buy a second KTM X-Bow version. It would buy a different model. Inside X-Bow, 2.0 MT is the specification.