Hyundai Genesis Coupe: Which Version Should You Buy?
The Hyundai Genesis Coupe in this catalogue is a RWD Coupe offered in one generation, including its restyling, from September 2009 through July 2014. Choosing among its versions comes down to two engine families: the 1998 cc turbocharged Inline Gasoline engine and the 3778 cc naturally aspirated V-shaped Gasoline engine.
The Hyundai Genesis Coupe in this catalogue is a RWD Coupe offered in one generation, including its restyling, from September 2009 through July 2014. Choosing among its versions comes down to two engine families: the 1998 cc turbocharged Inline Gasoline engine and the 3778 cc naturally aspirated V-shaped Gasoline engine. The original cars provide 210–213 hp from the 2.0 engine or 306 hp from the 3.8 engine; the restyled range raises those figures to 250–274 hp and 354 hp respectively. Buyers prioritizing acceleration should start with the restyled 3.8 MT, which reaches 100 km/h in 5.3 seconds. Those seeking the lowest measured combined consumption should consider the restyled 250 hp 2.0 AT, rated at 6.8 l/100 km.
Hyundai Genesis Coupe generations and versions
The first-generation Hyundai Genesis Coupe was produced from September 2009 to March 2012 as a Coupe with six versions. Its 2.0 MT and 2.0 AT variants use a 1998 cc turbo engine, while the 3.8 MT and 3.8 AT use a 3778 cc engine without boost. Depending on the data entry, the 2.0 versions produce 210 or 213 hp; both 3.8 versions produce 306 hp.
The first-generation restyling ran from March 2012 to July 2014, remained a Coupe, and contains seven versions. The 1998 cc turbo engine is listed with 250, 260, or 274 hp, while the 3778 cc engine produces 354 hp. The restyling also offers six-speed Manual and eight-speed Automatic transmissions, although one database entry named 2.0 AT is specified with a six-speed Manual transmission. Every listed version is RWD.
Hyundai Genesis Coupe engine options and specs
Repeated version names are distinguished below by production phase and power. Names remain exactly as recorded in the catalogue.
| Production phase and version | Power | Torque | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders and layout | Boost | Gearbox | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original 2.0 MT, 210 hp | 210 hp | 299 Nm | 1998 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | Turbo | 6-speed Manual | RWD |
| Original 2.0 AT, 210 hp | 210 hp | 299 Nm | 1998 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | Turbo | 6-speed Automatic | RWD |
| Original 2.0 MT, 213 hp | 213 hp | 302 Nm | 1998 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | Turbo | 6-speed Manual | RWD |
| Original 2.0 AT, 213 hp | 213 hp | 302 Nm | 1998 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | Turbo | 5-speed Automatic | RWD |
| Original 3.8 AT, 306 hp | 306 hp | 361 Nm | 3778 cc | Gasoline | 6, V-shaped | No | 6-speed Automatic | RWD |
| Original 3.8 MT, 306 hp | 306 hp | 361 Nm | 3778 cc | Gasoline | 6, V-shaped | No | 6-speed Manual | RWD |
| Restyled 2.0 AT, 250 hp | 250 hp | 373 Nm | 1998 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | Turbo | 8-speed Automatic | RWD |
| Restyled 2.0 MT, 260 hp | 260 hp | 353 Nm | 1998 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | Turbo | 6-speed Manual | RWD |
| Restyled 2.0 AT, 260 hp | 260 hp | 353 Nm | 1998 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | Turbo | 8-speed Automatic | RWD |
| Restyled 3.8 MT, 354 hp | 354 hp | 400 Nm | 3778 cc | Gasoline | 6, V-shaped | No | 6-speed Manual | RWD |
| Restyled 2.0 AT, 274 hp | 274 hp | 373 Nm | 1998 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | Turbo | 6-speed Manual | RWD |
| Restyled 3.8 AT, 354 hp | 354 hp | 400 Nm | 3778 cc | Gasoline | 6, V-shaped | No | 8-speed Automatic | RWD |
| Restyled 2.0 MT, 274 hp | 274 hp | 373 Nm | 1998 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | Turbo | 6-speed Manual | RWD |
The restyling’s largest gains are easy to quantify. Compared with the original 213 hp 2.0 versions, the 274 hp versions add 61 hp and 71 Nm. Compared with the original 306 hp 3.8 versions, the restyled 3.8 versions add 48 hp and 39 Nm.
Displacement-normalized output further separates the choices. The 1998 cc turbo engines produce approximately 105–137 hp per litre across the catalogue, whereas the 3778 cc engines produce approximately 81 hp per litre in original form and 94 hp per litre after restyling. Power per litre does not measure reliability or overall durability, but it clearly shows how much output each engine specification extracts from its displacement.
Hyundai Genesis Coupe performance, fuel economy and mpg data
| Production phase and version | 0–100 km/h | Top speed | City | Highway | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original 2.0 MT, 210 hp | 8.1 s | 222 km/h | 12.3 l/100 km | 7.0 l/100 km | 9.0 l/100 km |
| Original 2.0 AT, 210 hp | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Original 2.0 MT, 213 hp | 8.1 s | 222 km/h | 12.3 l/100 km | 7.0 l/100 km | 9.0 l/100 km |
| Original 2.0 AT, 213 hp | 8.2 s | 223 km/h | 12.7 l/100 km | 7.2 l/100 km | 9.2 l/100 km |
| Original 3.8 AT, 306 hp | 6.8 s | 235 km/h | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Original 3.8 MT, 306 hp | 6.0 s | 240 km/h | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Restyled 2.0 AT, 250 hp | 7.2 s | 232 km/h | 9.5 l/100 km | 5.2 l/100 km | 6.8 l/100 km |
| Restyled 2.0 MT, 260 hp | 7.4 s | 236 km/h | 14.8 l/100 km | 7.1 l/100 km | 9.9 l/100 km |
| Restyled 2.0 AT, 260 hp | 7.2 s | 235 km/h | 15.2 l/100 km | 7.4 l/100 km | 10.3 l/100 km |
| Restyled 3.8 MT, 354 hp | 5.3 s | not measured | 13.1 l/100 km | 8.7 l/100 km | 11.2 l/100 km |
| Restyled 2.0 AT, 274 hp | 7.2 s | 245 km/h | 11.2 l/100 km | 7.6 l/100 km | not measured |
| Restyled 3.8 AT, 354 hp | 5.4 s | not measured | 14.7 l/100 km | 9.4 l/100 km | 12.4 l/100 km |
| Restyled 2.0 MT, 274 hp | 7.4 s | 245 km/h | 11.2 l/100 km | 7.8 l/100 km | not measured |
For the original 306 hp 3.8 pair, choosing the 3.8 MT instead of the 3.8 AT cuts the measured 0–100 km/h time by 0.8 seconds and raises top speed by 5 km/h. In the restyled 354 hp pair, the 3.8 MT is only 0.1 seconds quicker to 100 km/h than the 3.8 AT. Its measured combined consumption is also 1.2 l/100 km lower.
Among restyled 260 hp versions, the 2.0 AT is 0.2 seconds quicker to 100 km/h than the 2.0 MT, but consumes 0.4 l/100 km more in the city, 0.3 l/100 km more on the highway, and 0.4 l/100 km more combined. The 274 hp 2.0 AT and 2.0 MT entries share a 245 km/h top speed; the version named 2.0 AT reaches 100 km/h 0.2 seconds sooner and uses 0.2 l/100 km less on the highway. Combined consumption for both 274 hp entries is not measured.
Hyundai Genesis Coupe dimensions, weight and practical specifications
External length and other body dimensions are not measured in the supplied data. Kerb weight, gross weight, ground clearance, fuel-tank capacity, and available wheel sizes are recorded.
| Production phase and version | Kerb weight | Gross weight | Ground clearance | Tank | Wheels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original 2.0 MT, 210 hp | 1505 kg | not measured | 130 mm | 65 l | not measured |
| Original 2.0 AT, 210 hp | not measured | not measured | 130 mm | 65 l | not measured |
| Original 2.0 MT, 213 hp | 1495 kg | 1920 kg | 129 mm | 65 l | 225/45 R18; 245/45 R18 |
| Original 2.0 AT, 213 hp | 1525 kg | 1920 kg | 129 mm | 65 l | 225/45 R18; 245/45 R18 |
| Original 3.8 AT, 306 hp | 1560 kg | 1920 kg | 129 mm | 65 l | 225/45 R18; 245/45 R18 |
| Original 3.8 MT, 306 hp | 1560 kg | 1920 kg | 129 mm | 65 l | 225/45 R18; 245/45 R18 |
| Restyled 2.0 AT, 250 hp | 1605 kg | 1950 kg | 129 mm | 65 l | 225/45 R18; 245/45 R18 |
| Restyled 2.0 MT, 260 hp | 1515 kg | 1950 kg | 130 mm | 65 l | 225/45 R18; 245/45 R18 |
| Restyled 2.0 AT, 260 hp | 1515 kg | 1950 kg | 130 mm | 65 l | 225/45 R18; 245/45 R18 |
| Restyled 3.8 MT, 354 hp | 1557 kg | not measured | 130 mm | 65 l | 225/40 R19; 245/40 R19 |
| Restyled 2.0 AT, 274 hp | 1525 kg | 1950 kg | 130 mm | 65 l | 225/45 R18; 245/45 R18 |
| Restyled 3.8 AT, 354 hp | 1580 kg | not measured | 130 mm | 65 l | 225/40 R19; 245/40 R19 |
| Restyled 2.0 MT, 274 hp | 1525 kg | 1950 kg | 130 mm | 65 l | 225/45 R18; 245/45 R18 |
The measured power-to-weight comparisons favor the restyled 3.8 models. The 3.8 MT carries approximately 4.4 kg per hp, and the 3.8 AT approximately 4.5 kg per hp. The original 306 hp 3.8 versions are about 5.1 kg per hp. Among the restyled turbo choices, both 274 hp entries are approximately 5.6 kg per hp, the 260 hp entries approximately 5.8 kg per hp, and the heavier 250 hp 2.0 AT approximately 6.4 kg per hp.
Which Hyundai Genesis Coupe version should you buy?
For maximum measured acceleration, choose the restyled 3.8 MT with 354 hp and 400 Nm. Its 5.3-second 0–100 km/h result is the quickest in the data, and its approximately 4.4 kg-per-hp ratio is the strongest listed. The restyled 3.8 AT is the close Automatic alternative: it has the same power and torque, takes 5.4 seconds to reach 100 km/h, and uses an eight-speed Automatic.
For the best balance of measured economy and acceleration, the restyled 250 hp 2.0 AT is the standout. It reaches 100 km/h in 7.2 seconds while returning 6.8 l/100 km combined, the lowest measured combined figure in the catalogue. The trade-off is its 1605 kg kerb weight, which is 80 kg heavier than either 274 hp entry and 90 kg heavier than either 260 hp entry.
For the strongest 2.0 engine output, select a restyled 274 hp version. Both the 2.0 AT and 2.0 MT provide 373 Nm, reach 245 km/h, and weigh 1525 kg. The database specifies a six-speed Manual for both entries despite their different recorded names. Their combined fuel consumption is not measured, so a complete economy comparison cannot be made.
For an original-generation car, the 3.8 MT offers the clearest performance case. It delivers the same 306 hp and 361 Nm as the original 3.8 AT but reaches 100 km/h in 6.0 rather than 6.8 seconds and has a 240 rather than 235 km/h top speed. If measured consumption matters more, the original 210 hp or 213 hp 2.0 MT returns 9.0 l/100 km combined; the 213 hp 2.0 AT returns 9.2 l/100 km.
Hyundai Genesis Coupe reliability, engine problems, recalls, engine-swap compatibility, weight distribution, replacement costs, and cars for sale cannot be compared from the supplied data because those facts are not measured. On the available evidence alone, the restyled 3.8 MT is the performance choice, the restyled 250 hp 2.0 AT is the measured economy choice, and a restyled 274 hp 2.0 version is the highest-output turbo choice.