Great Wall Pegasus: Which Version Should You Buy?
The Great Wall Pegasus catalogue lists two versions, both named 2.2 MT, for the model’s single generation produced from 2006 to 2008. Their engines and transmissions are identical; the meaningful choice is between RWD and AWD. The RWD version is 85 kg lighter, while the AWD version retains the same engine output, maximum speed, ground clearance, and fuel-tank capacity.
The Great Wall Pegasus catalogue lists two versions, both named 2.2 MT, for the model’s single generation produced from 2006 to 2008. Their engines and transmissions are identical; the meaningful choice is between RWD and AWD. The RWD version is 85 kg lighter, while the AWD version retains the same engine output, maximum speed, ground clearance, and fuel-tank capacity. For buyers who do not specifically need AWD, the RWD 2.2 MT offers the more favorable weight-to-power ratio. The AWD 2.2 MT is the version to choose when the drive system itself is the priority.
Great Wall Pegasus generations and version choice
The Great Wall Pegasus has one generation in the supplied catalogue. The 1 generation was produced from 2006 to 2008 as an SUV 5-doors, with two listed versions. Because there is no second generation in the data, there are no generation-to-generation changes to compare. The decision is entirely between the RWD and AWD forms of 2.2 MT within the same generation.
Both versions share the same production period and body type. No restyling is listed, so the available data does not show a later update with different engines, transmissions, dimensions, or performance.
Great Wall Pegasus engine and specs
Both 2.2 MT versions use a 2237 cc Gasoline engine producing 105 hp (77 kW) at 4600 rpm and 190 Nm at 3200 rpm. The engine has 4 cylinders in an Inline layout, with 2 valves per cylinder and no boost. Its fuel system is Distributed injection (multi-point), and the specified fuel is 92.
The shared output works out to approximately 46.9 hp per litre and 84.9 Nm per litre. Since both versions use the same engine, neither provides an advantage in power density or torque density.
| Version | Power | Torque | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 MT (RWD) | 105 hp (77 kW) at 4600 rpm | 190 Nm at 3200 rpm | 2237 cc | Gasoline | 4 | Inline | No | 5-speed Manual | RWD |
| 2.2 MT (AWD) | 105 hp (77 kW) at 4600 rpm | 190 Nm at 3200 rpm | 2237 cc | Gasoline | 4 | Inline | No | 5-speed Manual | AWD |
The specifications make the comparison straightforward: buying the AWD version does not add engine power, torque, gearbox ratios, or a higher listed maximum speed. It changes the drive system and adds weight.
Great Wall Pegasus performance and economy
The RWD 2.2 MT has a listed maximum speed of 160 km/h. Its 0–100 km/h acceleration is not measured. City fuel consumption, highway fuel consumption, and combined fuel consumption are also not measured.
The AWD 2.2 MT likewise has a maximum speed of 160 km/h. Its 0–100 km/h acceleration is not measured, while city, highway, and combined fuel consumption are not measured.
Fuel-economy differences therefore cannot be quantified from the available data. The AWD version weighs more, but the catalogue provides no measured consumption figures from which to calculate an MPG advantage or penalty. CO₂ output and environmental class are not measured for either version.
Great Wall Pegasus dimensions, weight, and ground clearance
The RWD 2.2 MT has a kerb weight of 1625 kg and a gross weight of 1950 kg. The AWD 2.2 MT has a kerb weight of 1710 kg and a gross weight of 2035 kg. AWD adds 85 kg to both listed weight figures.
Despite that difference, each version has a 205 mm ground clearance and a 64-litre fuel tank. Wheel sizes are not measured for either version.
| Version | Kerb weight | Gross weight | Ground clearance | Fuel tank | Wheel sizes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 MT (RWD) | 1625 kg | 1950 kg | 205 mm | 64 litres | Not measured |
| 2.2 MT (AWD) | 1710 kg | 2035 kg | 205 mm | 64 litres | Not measured |
Both versions have a 325 kg difference between kerb and gross weight. Their weight-to-power figures differ, however: the RWD 2.2 MT carries approximately 15.5 kg per hp, compared with approximately 16.3 kg per hp for the AWD 2.2 MT. Put another way, the RWD version offers about 64.6 hp per tonne of kerb weight, while the AWD version offers about 61.4 hp per tonne.
The front suspension is Independent, spring on both versions. Both also have Disc front brakes and Disc rear brakes. Rear-suspension specification is not measured.
Great Wall Pegasus reliability and problems
Reliability results and recorded problems are not measured in the supplied data. There are no figures for repair frequency, component life, maintenance cost, or failure rates, so neither 2.2 MT version can be declared more reliable from this catalogue information.
The available specifications only establish that both versions share the same engine output, torque, fuel system, Manual gearbox, maximum speed, and production years. Any claim that RWD or AWD is more reliable would require evidence not included here.
Which Great Wall Pegasus 2.2 MT should you buy?
Choose the RWD 2.2 MT if your priority is the lighter specification. At 1625 kg, it is 85 kg lighter than the AWD version while retaining the same 105 hp, 190 Nm, 160 km/h maximum speed, 205 mm ground clearance, and 64-litre tank. Its approximately 15.5 kg-per-hp ratio is also better than the AWD version’s approximately 16.3 kg per hp.
Choose the AWD 2.2 MT if AWD is the deciding requirement. What the heavier version adds in the supplied specifications is AWD itself; it does not add power, torque, maximum speed, ground clearance, or tank capacity. Its kerb and gross weights are each 85 kg higher than those of the RWD version.
There is no price data, so the extra purchase cost of AWD and its value for money cannot be calculated. On specifications alone, the RWD 2.2 MT is the stronger default choice because it delivers the shared engine and performance figures with less weight. The AWD 2.2 MT is the more targeted choice for a buyer who values AWD enough to accept the additional 85 kg.