Geely Haoqing: Which Version to Buy and Why
The Geely Haoqing was produced from 1998 to 2006 in a single generation, with a Mini 5-doors body and two versions: 1.0 MT and 1.3 AT. The choice is straightforward. The 1.0 MT combines a smaller 993 cc Gasoline engine, 52 hp, and a 5-speed Manual gearbox. The 1.3 AT offers a larger 1,342 cc Gasoline engine, 86 hp, 110 Nm, and a 5-speed Automatic gearbox.
The Geely Haoqing was produced from 1998 to 2006 in a single generation, with a Mini 5-doors body and two versions: 1.0 MT and 1.3 AT. The choice is straightforward. The 1.0 MT combines a smaller 993 cc Gasoline engine, 52 hp, and a 5-speed Manual gearbox. The 1.3 AT offers a larger 1,342 cc Gasoline engine, 86 hp, 110 Nm, and a 5-speed Automatic gearbox. Both versions are FWD, use inline naturally aspirated engines, and have 145 mm of ground clearance. In numerical terms, the 1.3 AT provides 34 hp more and is the stronger choice; the 1.0 MT is the alternative for buyers who specifically want the smaller engine and Manual transmission.
Geely Haoqing generation and versions
There is only one Geely Haoqing generation to compare. It ran from 1998 to 2006 and used a Mini 5-doors body throughout the production period covered by the data. This generation contains two versions, 1.0 MT and 1.3 AT. Because no additional generation or restyling is listed, the buying decision is between these two powertrain configurations rather than between different eras of the model.
The 1.0 MT and 1.3 AT share several fundamentals. Both have a front, transverse engine installation, Distributed injection (multi-point), no boost, FWD, Euro 2 classification, Independent, spring front suspension, and Ventilated disc front brakes. Their principal differences are engine displacement, cylinder count, output, and gearbox type.
Geely Haoqing engine and specs
| Version | Power | Torque | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 MT | 52 hp (38 kW) at 5,500 rpm | not measured | 993 cc | Gasoline, 92 | 3 | Inline | No | 5-speed Manual | FWD |
| 1.3 AT | 86 hp (63 kW) at 6,000 rpm | 110 Nm at 5,200 rpm | 1,342 cc | Gasoline, 92 | 4 | Inline | No | 5-speed Automatic | FWD |
The 1.0 MT produces approximately 52.4 hp per litre, calculated from 52 hp and 993 cc. Its torque figure is not measured. This version has 3 Inline cylinders and no boost.
The 1.3 AT produces approximately 64.1 hp per litre from 86 hp and 1,342 cc. It therefore delivers about 11.7 more horsepower per litre than the 1.0 MT. Its specific output is approximately 22% higher. The 1.3 AT also has 4 valves per cylinder, a compression ratio of 9.3, and a bore-and-stroke measurement of 78.7 × 69. The valves per cylinder, compression ratio, and bore-and-stroke figures for the 1.0 MT are not measured.
Moving from 1.0 MT to 1.3 AT adds 349 cc of displacement and one cylinder. Power increases by 34 hp, from 52 hp to 86 hp, which is approximately a 65% increase. The 1.3 AT also supplies a measured 110 Nm of torque, whereas torque for the 1.0 MT is not measured. These figures make the 1.3 AT the clear specification-led choice when engine output matters most.
Transmission preference may decide the comparison before engine output does. The 1.0 MT uses a 5-speed Manual gearbox, while the 1.3 AT uses a 5-speed Automatic gearbox. Both send power through FWD, so neither version offers a different drive layout.
Geely Haoqing performance and mpg
Neither version has enough measured performance or economy data for a verified speed or fuel-consumption comparison.
| Version | 0–100 km/h | Top speed | City consumption | Highway consumption | Combined consumption | CO₂ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 MT | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | |
| 1.3 AT | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
The 1.3 AT has 34 hp more than the 1.0 MT, but no measured 0–100 km/h or top-speed result is provided for either version. It would therefore be inaccurate to attach a specific acceleration or speed advantage to the extra power.
Geely Haoqing mpg cannot be calculated from the supplied specifications because city, highway, and combined fuel-consumption figures are not measured for both the 1.0 MT and 1.3 AT. Tank capacity is also not measured. Both engines use Gasoline, 92 and meet Euro 2, but those shared facts do not establish that their fuel economy is identical.
Geely Haoqing dimensions and weight
| Version | Kerb weight | Gross weight | Ground clearance | Tank | Wheel sizes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 MT | not measured | not measured | 145 mm | not measured | not measured |
| 1.3 AT | 930 kg | not measured | 145 mm | not measured | not measured |
Both versions provide 145 mm of ground clearance, so clearance does not distinguish the 1.0 MT from the 1.3 AT. Gross weight, tank capacity, and wheel sizes are not measured for either version. Kerb weight is also not measured for the 1.0 MT, preventing a direct weight comparison.
The 1.3 AT has a measured kerb weight of 930 kg. With 86 hp, that equals approximately 10.8 kg per horsepower, or about 92.5 hp per tonne. A corresponding weight-per-horsepower result for the 1.0 MT cannot be calculated because its kerb weight is not measured.
Geely Haoqing reliability and problems data
Reliability records and model-specific problem reports are not included in the supplied data, so neither 1.0 MT nor 1.3 AT can be declared more reliable from these specifications alone. The available mechanical comparison shows that both use Gasoline engines with Distributed injection (multi-point), no boost, and a front, transverse installation. Both also share FWD, Euro 2 classification, Independent, spring front suspension, and Ventilated disc front brakes.
Rear suspension and rear brake specifications are not measured for either version. Maintenance intervals, component life, repair frequency, and failure rates are also not measured. A reliability-based buying decision therefore requires evidence beyond the supplied catalogue figures.
Which Geely Haoqing version should you buy?
Choose the 1.3 AT if output and measured specification depth are the priorities. Its 1,342 cc engine produces 86 hp and 110 Nm, compared with 52 hp and unmeasured torque for the 993 cc 1.0 MT. It has 34 hp more, approximately 65% greater power, and roughly 22% higher power per litre. It is also the only version with a measured kerb weight, allowing its 10.8 kg-per-horsepower figure to be established. The 5-speed Automatic gearbox further separates it from the Manual alternative.
Choose the 1.0 MT if the desired configuration is specifically the smaller 993 cc, 3-cylinder Inline engine with a 5-speed Manual gearbox. It produces 52 hp at 5,500 rpm and retains the same FWD layout, 145 mm ground clearance, Euro 2 classification, Independent, spring front suspension, and Ventilated disc front brakes as the 1.3 AT. However, its torque, kerb weight, acceleration, top speed, and fuel consumption are not measured, so the data cannot prove an economy or weight advantage for the smaller engine.
On the supplied numbers alone, the 1.3 AT is the stronger all-round selection because it buys 349 cc of additional displacement, one extra cylinder, and 34 additional horsepower, together with a measured 110 Nm of torque. The 1.0 MT remains the configuration-led choice for a buyer who values a Manual gearbox and smaller engine more than the 1.3 AT’s substantial output advantage. Price data is not available, so the specifications cannot determine how much extra the 1.3 AT costs or whether that premium represents better financial value.