Geely Geometry C: which version to buy
The Geely Geometry C is a five-door electric SUV sold from April 2020 through December 2024 in one generation, with a restyling from June 2023. Every measured version uses an Electro motor at 204 hp (150 kW) and 310 Nm, an Automatic 1-speed gearbox, FWD, and CO2 0. The buying choice is not about horsepower.
The Geely Geometry C is a five-door electric SUV sold from April 2020 through December 2024 in one generation, with a restyling from June 2023. Every measured version uses an Electro motor at 204 hp (150 kW) and 310 Nm, an Automatic 1-speed gearbox, FWD, and CO2 0. The buying choice is not about horsepower. It is about generation (first run versus restyling) and, inside the restyling, kerb weight. The four catalogue names to keep exact are AT 350, AT 460, AT 360, and AT 480.
Geometry C generations: first run versus restyling
The first production block is 1 generation, April 2020–May 2023, SUV 5-doors, two versions: AT 350 and AT 460. Both are listed with the same motor, the same 7.7 s to 100 km/h, the same 150 km/h top speed, and the same 1545 kg kerb weight.
The restyling of that same generation runs June 2023–December 2024, still SUV 5-doors, two versions: AT 360 and AT 480. Motor figures stay 204 hp / 150 kW / 310 Nm. Acceleration is 7.0 s on both restyling versions — 0.7 s quicker than the first-run 7.7 s — while top speed stays 150 km/h. AT 360 keeps 1545 kg; AT 480 is 1607 kg.
There is no second generation in these data. A 2023 or 2024 Geometry C is the restyling of generation 1. Searches for Geometry C 2025 or 2026 do not match a later generation here: production in the data ends 2024-12-31.
Geometry C specs and engine: four names, one motor
Displacement is not measured on every version, so power per litre cannot be calculated. Cylinders, cylinder layout, valves per cylinder, boost, engine placement, and fuel-system type are not measured. The English labels that are present are Electro for engine type and Electro for fuel.
| Version | hp | kW | Nm | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Speeds | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT 350 | 204 | 150 | 310 | not measured | Electro | not measured | not measured | not measured | Automatic | 1 | FWD |
| AT 460 | 204 | 150 | 310 | not measured | Electro | not measured | not measured | not measured | Automatic | 1 | FWD |
| AT 360 | 204 | 150 | 310 | not measured | Electro | not measured | not measured | not measured | Automatic | 1 | FWD |
| AT 480 | 204 | 150 | 310 | not measured | Electro | not measured | not measured | not measured | Automatic | 1 | FWD |
AT 350 versus AT 460: horsepower difference 0, torque difference 0, gearbox and drive identical. On the measured powertrain, they are the same car under two names.
AT 360 versus AT 480: same 204 hp, same 310 Nm, same Automatic 1, same FWD. The restyling pair is not split by motor output.
Geometry C horsepower, 0-100, and mpg
Horsepower does not separate the range: 204 hp on AT 350, AT 460, AT 360, and AT 480. Peak torque is 310 Nm on all four.
0–100 km/h does separate generations. First-run AT 350 and AT 460: 7.7 s. Restyling AT 360 and AT 480: 7.0 s. The restyling is 0.7 s quicker with unchanged 204 hp. Top speed is 150 km/h on all four.
Fuel consumption city / highway / combined is not measured on any version. There is no mpg figure to rank AT 350 against AT 460 or AT 360 against AT 480. CO2 is 0 on all four. Eco class is not measured.
Geometry C weight, dimensions, and clearance
Kerb weight is the only mass figure that differs.
- AT 350: 1545 kg. Weight per horsepower: 1545 / 204 = 7.57 kg/hp.
- AT 460: 1545 kg. Same 7.57 kg/hp.
- AT 360: 1545 kg. Same 7.57 kg/hp, but 7.0 s instead of 7.7 s.
- AT 480: 1607 kg. 1607 − 1545 = 62 kg heavier. Weight per horsepower: 1607 / 204 = 7.88 kg/hp.
Power per kilogram: 204 / 1545 = 0.132 hp/kg on AT 350, AT 460, and AT 360; 204 / 1607 = 0.127 hp/kg on AT 480. Gross weight is not measured on any version. Ground clearance is 140 mm on all four. Fuel tank is not measured (electric; no tank volume in the data). Wheel sizes are not measured. Overall length, width, height, and wheelbase are not measured, so a dimensions comparison between versions cannot be written from these figures.
Chassis labels are the same on every version: front suspension Independent, spring; rear Semi-independent, springorts hélicoïdaux, sem; front brakes Ventilated disc; rear Disc.
Geometry C 2023 vs 2024 specs: what the restyling changed
On the numbers given, the restyling (from June 2023, covering 2023 and 2024 catalogue years) keeps 204 hp, 310 Nm, 150 km/h, FWD, Automatic 1, CO2 0, and 140 mm clearance. What changes is acceleration: 7.7 s → 7.0 s (0.7 s). AT 360 also keeps the first-run kerb 1545 kg. AT 480 adds 62 kg and still posts 7.0 s, so the extra mass does not show up as a slower 0–100 in these data.
A 2023–2024 review that is looking for a faster Geometry C is looking at AT 360 or AT 480, not at a different motor.
Geometry C AT 350 vs AT 460, AT 360 vs AT 480, Pure vs Pro
The names AT 350 and AT 460 (and later AT 360 / AT 480) are the catalogue keys. They are not accompanied here by battery kWh, WLTP range, or trim labels such as Pure or Pro. A Pure versus Pro choice cannot be scored from these rows.
AT 350 vs AT 460 (2020-04-01 to 2023-05-31): identical 204 hp, 310 Nm, 7.7 s, 150 km/h, 1545 kg, 140 mm. There is no arithmetic gap that makes one the “performance” version. If both are on the same generation, the measured spec sheet does not pick a winner.
AT 360 vs AT 480 (2023-06-01 to 2024-12-31): identical 204 hp, 310 Nm, 7.0 s, 150 km/h, 140 mm. The only measured difference is kerb weight: 1545 kg versus 1607 kg. AT 360 is the lighter restyling version (7.57 kg/hp). AT 480 is the heavier one (7.88 kg/hp, +62 kg) with the same stopwatch figure.
If the question is “480 Pro versus 460 Pro”: AT 480 is restyling, AT 460 is first run. Same 204 hp; AT 480 is 0.7 s quicker ( 7.0 vs 7.7 ) and 62 kg heavier ( 1607 vs 1545 ).
Which Geometry C version to choose
Choose a restyling version — AT 360 or AT 480 — if the 0–100 number is the criterion. Both do 7.0 s against 7.7 s on AT 350 and AT 460. Power is unchanged, so the generation step is the acceleration step.
Choose AT 360 if you want that 7.0 s without the extra mass. It matches first-run kerb weight (1545 kg) and restyling acceleration. It is the lowest kg/hp among the restyling pair.
Choose AT 480 only if you have a reason that is not on this spec sheet. It is 62 kg heavier than AT 360 and no quicker to 100 km/h, no faster at the top, and no more powerful. The data do not record battery size, range, or equipment that might explain the mass.
Do not choose between AT 350 and AT 460 on horsepower, torque, weight, or 0–100. Those four columns are equal. The same applies to motor layout: cylinders and layout are not measured, so neither first-run name can be called a different engine.
There is no price ranking here. Price, Egypt price, and “what the extra money buys” in currency are not in the data. The only “extra” that is measured is 62 kg on AT 480 and 0.7 s on the restyling.
Geometry C vs EX5, E, BYD Dolphin, Atto 3, MG4, Zeekr X
This catalogue row set contains only Geometry C. Geometry A price, Geometry C versus EX5, versus E, versus BYD Dolphin, versus Atto 3, MG4 versus Geometry C, and Zeekr X versus Geometry C cannot be scored with numbers from these data. Any such comparison would invent figures. Stick to the four named versions above.
Geometry C problems and reliability
Problem lists and reliability scores are not measured in these data. What is measured and identical across versions is the powertrain type (Electro), CO2 0, FWD, Automatic 1, front Ventilated disc, rear Disc, front Independent, spring, rear Semi-independent, springorts hélicoïdaux, sem, and 140 mm clearance. Those shared items do not rank AT 350 above AT 460 or AT 360 above AT 480 for durability.
Short pick: restyling AT 360 is the version that improves 0–100 by 0.7 s without adding the 62 kg that AT 480 carries. AT 350 and AT 460 are the same on every measured number and are the slower pair.