Ford Scorpio

Ford Scorpio generations

Dictionary labels below are taken as stored: Gasoline, Diesel, Inline, V-shaped, No, Turbo, Automatic, Manual, RWD, AWD. Duplicate names are split by horsepower (and, where two 2.0 MT or 2.0 AT share 115 hp, by the other measured fields in that row).

1 generation (1985-01-01–1994-12-31) is a Sedan with 70 versions in the catalogue count. The extract lists 12 of them, all dated 1985-01-01 to 1994-12-31. Engines in that list are Gasoline only: an Inline 4 from 1796 cm³ (1.8 MT, 90 hp) through several 1993 and 1998 cm³ 2.0 units, plus V-shaped 6-cylinder 2.4 (2394 cm³, 125 hp) and 2.9 AT (2933 cm³, 145 hp). Gearboxes are Manual 5 or Automatic 4. Boost is No on every listed 1 generation version. Body type in the generation record is Sedan; no other body label is in this data.

2 generation (1994-01-01–1998-12-31) is a Sedan with 20 versions in the catalogue count. The extract lists 12. Most of those run 1994-10-01 to 1998-08-31; two 2.0 115 hp cars (2.0 MT and 2.0 AT) are dated 1994-01-01 to 1998-12-31. The range is Gasoline Inline 4 at 1998 cm³ and 2295 cm³, Gasoline V-shaped 6 at 2935 cm³, and Diesel Inline 4 Turbo at 2500 cm³. Drive on every listed 2 generation version is RWD. Restyling is not a separate generation in this dataset; both blocks stay under the generation names given.

Ford Scorpio engine specs and trim levels

Dictionary labels below are taken as stored: Gasoline, Diesel, Inline, V-shaped, No, Turbo, Automatic, Manual, RWD, AWD. Duplicate names are split by horsepower (and, where two 2.0 MT or 2.0 AT share 115 hp, by the other measured fields in that row).

2 generation engine table

2.0 AT (115 hp) and 2.0 MT (115 hp, 12.1 s) use 2 valves per cylinder, 85 kW at 5500 rpm, 167 Nm at 2500 rpm, compression 9.8, bore × stroke 86 × 86, fuel 95, engine position Front, longitudinal, injection Distributed injection (multi-point). 2.0 MT (136 hp) and 2.0 AT (136 hp) use 4 valves per cylinder, 100 kW at 6000 rpm, 175 Nm at 4200 rpm; engine position is not measured. 2.3 MT and 2.3 AT are 108 kW at 5600 rpm, 202 Nm at 4500 rpm, compression 10, 89.6 × 91, fuel 95; 2.3 MT engine position is Front, longitudinal, 2.3 AT engine position is not measured. 2.9 AT (207 hp) is 152 kW at 6000 rpm, 281 Nm at 4200 rpm, compression 9.7, 93 × 72, Front, longitudinal. 2.9 AT (210 hp) is 154 kW at 6000 rpm, 275 Nm at 4500 rpm; engine position is not measured. 2.5 MT (115 hp) is 85 kW at 4200 rpm, 270 Nm at 2200 rpm, 2 valves per cylinder, fuel Diesel; compression and bore × stroke are not measured. 2.5 MT (125 hp) is 92 kW at 4200 rpm, 293 Nm at 2000 rpm, compression 21.5, 92 × 94, fuel Diesel. The second 2.0 MT (115 hp, 13.3 s) and second 2.0 AT (115 hp) use 4 valves per cylinder, 85 kW at 5500 rpm, 167 Nm at 2500 rpm, compression 9.8, 86 × 86, fuel 95.

1 generation engine table

2.9 AT (145 hp) is 107 kW at 5500 rpm, 229 Nm at 3000 rpm, 2 valves per cylinder, 93 × 72, fuel 92; compression and engine position are not measured. 2.4 MT and 2.4 AT are 92 kW at 5800 rpm, 182 Nm at 3500 rpm, 2 valves per cylinder, fuel 95, engine position Front, longitudinal; compression and bore × stroke are not measured. 1.8 MT is 66 kW at 5400 rpm, 140 Nm at 3500 rpm, 86.2 × 76.95; fuel grade is not measured. 2.0 AT (101 hp) and 2.0 MT (101 hp) are 74 kW at 5400 rpm, 148 Nm at 4000 rpm, 90.8 × 77, fuel 92. 2.0 AT (105 hp) is 77 kW at 5200 rpm, 157 Nm at 3500 rpm, fuel 95. 2.0 AT (115 hp) and 2.0 MT (115 hp) in 1 generation are 85 kW at 5500 rpm, 160 Nm at 4000 rpm, 1993 cm³, fuel 95; rear suspension on 2.0 MT (115 hp) is not measured. 2.0 MT (105 hp) is 77 kW at 5500 rpm, 170 Nm at 3000 rpm, 1998 cm³, Front, longitudinal. 2.0 MT (120 hp) and 2.0 AT (120 hp) are 88 kW at 5500 rpm, 171 Nm at 2500 rpm, 4 valves per cylinder, Front, longitudinal; bore × stroke is not measured. Compression is not measured on every listed 1 generation version.

Front brakes on every listed version are Ventilated disc. Rear brakes are Disc except 2.3 MT, 2.9 AT (207 hp), 2.9 AT (210 hp) and 2.0 AT (115 hp, 0–100 not measured) in 2 generation, which are Disc ventilated. Front and rear suspension, where measured, are Independent, spring.

Performance, 0–100 and mpg

Figures are as stored. Consumption in the data is litres per the city / highway / mixed fields, not a US mpg conversion (no mpg number is in the source).

2 generation. 2.0 AT (115 hp): 0–100 12.8 s, top speed 193, city 13.3, highway 7.9, mixed 8.8. 2.0 MT (115 hp, 12.1 s): 0–100 12.1 s (0.7 s quicker than that Automatic), top speed 193, city 13.3, highway 7.9, mixed 8.8. 2.0 MT (136 hp): 0–100 11.1 s, top speed 207; city, highway and mixed not measured. 2.0 AT (136 hp): 0–100 12.9 s, top speed 195; consumption not measured. 2.3 MT: 0–100 9.8 s, top speed 210; consumption not measured. 2.3 AT: 0–100 11.4 s, top speed 204; consumption not measured. 2.9 AT (207 hp): 0–100 9 s, top speed 225; consumption not measured. 2.9 AT (210 hp): 0–100 not measured, top speed 225; consumption not measured. 2.5 MT (115 hp): 0–100 11.9 s, top speed 193; consumption not measured. 2.5 MT (125 hp): 0–100 11.1 s, top speed 198; consumption not measured. 2.0 MT (115 hp, 13.3 s): 0–100 13.3 s, top speed 187; consumption not measured. 2.0 AT (115 hp, 0–100 not measured): 0–100 not measured, top speed not measured, consumption not measured. CO2 and eco class on all 2 generation listed versions: not measured.

Among measured 2 generation 0–100 times, 2.9 AT (207 hp) at 9 s is the quickest; 2.0 MT (115 hp, 13.3 s) at 13.3 s is the slowest. The highest measured top speed is 225 on both 2.9 AT (207 hp) and 2.9 AT (210 hp). The only 2 generation cars with measured consumption in this extract are the 2.0 AT (115 hp) and 2.0 MT (115 hp, 12.1 s) pair.

1 generation. 2.9 AT (145 hp): 0–100 not measured, top speed not measured, consumption not measured. 2.4 MT and 2.4 AT: 0–100 11 s, top speed 190; consumption not measured. 1.8 MT: 0–100 13.6 s, top speed 180, city 9.7, highway 6.4, mixed 7.9. 2.0 AT (101 hp), 2.0 AT (105 hp) and 2.0 AT (115 hp): 0–100 not measured, top speed not measured, consumption not measured. 2.0 MT (101 hp): 0–100 12.3 s, top speed 183; consumption not measured. 2.0 MT (115 hp): 0–100 12.3 s, top speed 200; consumption not measured. 2.0 MT (105 hp): 0–100 12.2 s, top speed 183; consumption not measured. 2.0 MT (120 hp) and 2.0 AT (120 hp): 0–100 11.2 s, top speed 192; consumption not measured. CO2 and eco class: not measured.

Among measured 1 generation 0–100 times, 2.4 MT, 2.4 AT at 11 s are the quickest listed; 1.8 MT at 13.6 s is the slowest. The highest measured 1 generation top speed in the extract is 200 on 2.0 MT (115 hp). The only 1 generation version with measured consumption is 1.8 MT.

Dimensions, weight, ground clearance and tank

Length, width, height and wheelbase are not measured in this dataset. Wheel sizes are not measured on every listed version. Fuel tank is 70 on every listed version.

Ground clearance is 120 where it is measured: 2 generation 2.0 MT (136 hp), 2.0 AT (136 hp), 2.3 AT, 2.9 AT (210 hp), 2.0 AT (115 hp, 0–100 not measured); 1 generation 2.9 AT (145 hp), 1.8 MT, 2.0 AT (101 hp), 2.0 MT (101 hp), 2.0 AT (105 hp), 2.0 AT (115 hp), 2.0 MT (115 hp). On the other listed versions ground clearance is not measured.

2 generation kerb / gross (kg). 2.0 AT (115 hp): 1435 / 2035. 2.0 MT (115 hp, 12.1 s): 1435 / 2035. 2.0 MT (136 hp): 1441 / 1990. 2.0 AT (136 hp): kerb not measured / 1990. 2.3 MT: 1440 / 2035. 2.3 AT: kerb not measured / 2035. 2.9 AT (207 hp): 1618 / 2125. 2.9 AT (210 hp): 1543 / 2080. 2.5 MT (115 hp): 1545 / 2145. 2.5 MT (125 hp): 1545 / 2260. 2.0 MT (115 hp, 13.3 s): 1485 / 2125. 2.0 AT (115 hp, 0–100 not measured): kerb not measured / 2125. The heaviest measured kerb in 2 generation here is 1618 on 2.9 AT (207 hp); the lightest measured kerb is 1435 on both 115 hp 2.0 cars dated to 1998-08-31. The highest gross is 2260 on 2.5 MT (125 hp).

1 generation kerb / gross (kg). 2.9 AT (145 hp): both not measured. 2.4 MT and 2.4 AT: 1325 / 1850. 1.8 MT: 1260 / gross not measured. 2.0 AT (101 hp) and 2.0 AT (105 hp): both not measured. 2.0 MT (101 hp): 1260 / gross not measured. 2.0 AT (115 hp): kerb not measured / 1260 (gross as stored). 2.0 MT (115 hp): 1260 / gross not measured. 2.0 MT (105 hp): 1215 / 1750. 2.0 MT (120 hp) and 2.0 AT (120 hp): 1260 / 1825. The lightest measured kerb in 1 generation here is 1215 on 2.0 MT (105 hp).

Which version to choose

Compare only the numbers in this extract.

If the need is the lowest measured 0–100 in the whole list, 2.9 AT (207 hp) in 2 generation is 9 s and 225 top speed, at 1618 kg kerb — 183 kg heavier than 2.9 AT (210 hp) at 1543 kg, which shares 225 top speed but has 0–100 not measured and 6 Nm less peak torque (275 vs 281). Both are Gasoline, 6, V-shaped, Automatic 4, RWD, boost No.

If the need is AWD, the only listed car is 1 generation 2.9 AT (145 hp): 145 hp, 229 Nm, 2933 cm³, fuel 92. Its 0–100, top speed, consumption, kerb and gross are not measured; ground clearance is 120.

If the need is a Diesel, both are 2 generation 2.5 MT: 115 hp (270 Nm at 2200) versus 125 hp (293 Nm at 2000). The 125 hp car is 10 hp and 23 Nm up, 0–100 11.1 vs 11.9 s, top speed 198 vs 193, same 1545 kg kerb, and 115 kg more gross (2260 vs 2145). Consumption on both is not measured. Boost is Turbo on both.

If the need is the smallest Gasoline engine, 1 generation 1.8 MT is 1796 cm³, 90 hp, 140 Nm, 0–100 13.6 s, top speed 180, and the only 1 generation row with measured consumption (9.7 / 6.4 / 7.9). That mixed 7.9 is 0.9 below the 8.8 mixed of 2 generation 2.0 AT (115 hp) and 2.0 MT (115 hp, 12.1 s). Fuel grade for 1.8 MT is not measured.

If the need is a 2.0 with measured economy in 2 generation, 2.0 MT (115 hp, 12.1 s) matches 2.0 AT (115 hp) on 13.3 / 7.9 / 8.8, 193 top speed and 1435 / 2035 kg, and is 0.7 s quicker to 100 (12.1 vs 12.8). 2.0 MT (136 hp) is 21 hp and 8 Nm up on those 115 hp cars, 0–100 11.1 s, top speed 207, kerb 1441, gross 1990 (45 kg less gross than the 115 hp pair); consumption is not measured. 2.0 AT (136 hp) is 12.9 s and 195 top speed — 1.8 s slower and 12 km/h down versus that Manual.

If the need is a 2.3, 2.3 MT is 9.8 s and 210 top speed versus 2.3 AT at 11.4 s and 204; both 147 hp and 202 Nm. 2.3 MT rear brakes are Disc ventilated; 2.3 AT rear brakes are Disc. Kerb on 2.3 AT is not measured; 2.3 MT kerb is 1440.

If the need is a 1 generation 2.0, 2.0 MT (120 hp) and 2.0 AT (120 hp) share 11.2 s and 192 top speed at 1260 / 1825 kg — 15 hp above 2.0 MT (105 hp) at 1998 cm³, which is the lightest measured kerb here (1215) with 0–100 12.2 s and top speed 183. 2.0 MT (115 hp) matches 2.0 MT (101 hp) at 12.3 s but has top speed 200 versus 183. Several 1 generation Automatics (2.0 AT 101, 105 and 115 hp) have 0–100, top speed and consumption not measured.

Reliability, problems, service manual

No reliability score, failure list, service-manual content, or sales listing is in this dataset. Those topics are not measured here. The catalogue facts for Ford Scorpio remain the generation dates, Sedan body, the version names above, and the hp, Nm, displacement, fuel, cylinder, layout, boost, gearbox, drive, 0–100, top speed, consumption, weight, clearance and tank fields as written.