Exlantix ET

Exlantix ET: which version to buy and why

The Exlantix ET is a single-generation SUV 5-doors (production from 2025-10-01, still current) with exactly two catalogue versions: AT RWD and AT. Both are Electro / Electro, both use an Automatic gearbox, and both share the same independent spring chassis and disc brake layout.

The Exlantix ET is a single-generation SUV 5-doors (production from 2025-10-01, still current) with exactly two catalogue versions: AT RWD and AT. Both are Electro / Electro, both use an Automatic gearbox, and both share the same independent spring chassis and disc brake layout. The buying choice is not “which generation” — there is only one — and not “which engine family.” It is a straight split: 313 hp / 425 Nm / RWD / 6.6 s to 100 / 200 top speed versus 480 hp / 662 Nm / AWD / 4.7 s to 100 / 210 top speed. Displacement, cylinder count, cylinder layout, and boost are not measured on either version, so there is no litres-per-horsepower figure to compare. Weight, ground clearance, tank size, and wheel sizes are also not measured, so there is no weight-per-horsepower ranking either. What the data does measure is enough to decide which of the two names on the spec sheet matches the job.

Exlantix ET generations: what actually changed between versions

There is 1 generation of the Exlantix ET. It starts 2025-10-01 and has no stop date in the data. Body type is SUV 5-doors. That generation contains 2 versions: AT RWD and AT. There is no restyling listed and no second generation to jump to, so “buy the later generation” is not an option. Every difference a buyer can use sits inside this one generation, on the same body, from the same start date.

Inside generation 1, AT RWD and AT are not a facelift pair. They are two driveline packages on the same SUV 5-doors shell. Shared: Electro power type, Electro fuel, Automatic gearbox, front and rear Independent, spring suspension, front Ventilated disc brakes, rear Disc brakes, start date 2025-10-01, no production end. Not shared: power, torque, drive, 0–100, and top speed. If a later generation appears, this article will have nothing to compare it against yet; as of the data, the generation-to-generation delta is zero because there is only generation 1.

Exlantix ET specs: AT RWD vs AT engine and drivetrain table

Version names below are the catalogue names. Two rows, two names; power is listed so they cannot be confused.

AT is 167 hp above AT RWD (480 − 313) and 123 kW above it (353 − 230). Torque on AT is 237 Nm higher (662 − 425). Relative to AT RWD, AT is about 1.53× the horsepower (480 ÷ 313) and about 1.56× the torque (662 ÷ 425). Neither version has a measured displacement, so power-per-litre cannot be calculated; neither has a measured cylinder count or layout, so there is no “more cylinders” argument. Boost is not measured on either. Gearbox type is the same word on both: Automatic. The drivetrain split is the other hard fact: AT RWD is RWD; AT is AWD. That is the whole engine-and-spec difference the numbers support.

Exlantix ET performance: 0-100, top speed, mpg

AT reaches 100 1.9 s sooner than AT RWD (6.6 − 4.7). Top speed on AT is 10 higher (210 − 200). Fuel consumption — city, highway, combined — is not measured for either version; there is no mpg ranking and no “which is cheaper to run on the sheet.” CO2 and eco class are not measured. If the buying question is “which is quicker on the published sprint and the published ceiling,” the answer is AT. If the question is “which uses less energy per distance,” the data does not measure it, so that question cannot be closed from this catalogue.

Exlantix ET dimensions, weight, tank, wheels

Kerb weight: not measured (AT RWD), not measured (AT). Gross weight: not measured (AT RWD), not measured (AT). Ground clearance: not measured (AT RWD), not measured (AT). Tank: not measured (AT RWD), not measured (AT). Wheels: not measured (AT RWD), not measured (AT).

There is no weight-per-horsepower comparison. AT has 167 hp more, but without kerb mass it is not possible to say whether that extra power is on a heavier or similar vehicle. Ground clearance cannot be used to pick an “off-road-leaning” version. Tank size is not a differentiator because both are Electro and the tank field is not measured. Wheel size cannot be used to pick ride or tyre cost. Suspension wording is identical: front Independent, spring, rear Independent, spring. Brakes are identical in the labels: front Ventilated disc, rear Disc. On chassis language, the two versions do not separate.

Which Exlantix ET version to choose

Choose AT RWD if the numbers you care about are 313 hp, 425 Nm, RWD, 6.6 to 100, and 200 top speed. That is the lower-output, rear-drive catalogue line. It is still Electro / Electro with an Automatic gearbox on the same SUV 5-doors generation 1 body. You are not choosing an older generation or a smaller engine displacement — displacement is not measured — you are choosing the version whose power is 313 hp (230 kW) and whose drive is RWD. Versus AT, you give up 167 hp, 237 Nm, AWD, 1.9 s on the 0–100 figure, and 10 on top speed. You do not give up a measured economy advantage, because economy is not measured. You do not give up a measured weight advantage, because weight is not measured.

Choose AT if the numbers you care about are 480 hp, 662 Nm, AWD, 4.7 to 100, and 210 top speed. That is the higher-output, all-wheel-drive line. Same generation, same start date 2025-10-01, same Automatic, same Electro labels. What the extra specification buys, in arithmetic on this data only: +167 hp, +123 kW, +237 Nm, a change of drive from RWD to AWD, −1.9 s to 100, +10 top speed. It does not buy a documented extra gearbox ratio count (gears: not measured on both). It does not buy a documented different suspension type. It does not buy a documented different brake type. It does not buy a measured range or mpg figure.

There is no third version and no generation fork. Buyers looking for a diesel, a petrol displacement, a cylinder layout, or a restyle year will not find those fields populated. The only named pair is AT RWD (313 hp) and AT (480 hp). If two listings use similar marketing language, match them to these names and these horsepower figures: AT RWD is the 313 hp RWD row; AT is the 480 hp AWD row. They do not share a horsepower number, so they cannot be mixed up the way two identically named petrol versions can.

Decision in one line. Need AWD, 480 hp, 662 Nm, 4.7 to 100, 210 top speed → AT. Need RWD, 313 hp, 425 Nm, 6.6 to 100, 200 top speed, and you are not using unpublished weight or mpg as a tie-breaker → AT RWD. Everything else that would normally settle a catalogue choice — litres, cylinders, boost, kerb weight, clearance, tank, wheels, consumption — is not measured on either Exlantix ET version.