Daewoo Nubira: generations compared: what actually changed

Power per litre (hp ÷ displacement in litres) using the listed figures:

1 generation (1997-02-01 to 1999-03-31) and 2 generation (1999-04-01 to 2002-03-31) share the same engine names and most of the same outputs: 1.5 MT 110 hp, 1.6 MT / 1.6 AT 106 hp, 1.8 MT / 1.8 AT 136 hp, 2.0 MT / 2.0 AT 133 hp, plus 2 generation 2.0 rows at 126 hp. Tank is 62 l on both. Ground clearance is 140 mm on 1 generation throughout; 2 generation adds 160 mm on several 2.0 and 1.6 AT rows.

3 generation (2002-06-01 to 2005-01-31) is the only generation with a 1.4 (94 hp, 1399 cm³) and the only one without a 1.5. The 1.8 drops from 136 hp / 1796 cm³ to 122 hp / 1799 cm³ (−14 hp, +3 cm³). The 2.0 is listed at 132 hp versus 133 hp or 126 hp earlier. Tank falls from 62 l to 60 l (−2 l). Kerb weight on the lightest 3 generation 1.4 MT / 1.6 MT is 1180 kg, 100 kg above the 1.5 MT at 1080 kg.

Power per litre (hp ÷ displacement in litres) using the listed figures:

Engine (typical)hp / litreshp per litre
1.8 136 hp / 1796 cm³ (1–2 gen)136 / 1.79675.7
1.5 110 hp / 1498 cm³110 / 1.49873.4
1.6 110 hp / 1598 cm³ (3 gen)110 / 1.59868.8
1.4 94 hp / 1399 cm³94 / 1.39967.2
1.8 122 hp / 1799 cm³ (3 gen)122 / 1.79967.8
2.0 133 hp / 1998 cm³133 / 1.99866.6
2.0 132 hp / 1998 cm³ (3 gen)132 / 1.99866.1
1.6 106 hp / 1598 cm³ (1–2 gen)106 / 1.59866.3
2.0 126 hp / 1998 cm³ (2 gen)126 / 1.99863.1

The 1.8 of 1 generation / 2 generation is the densest engine in the data. The 3 generation 1.8 is 7.9 hp/l lower. The 2.0 at 126 hp is the least dense.

Engines and specs (all listed versions)

Use the exact names. Where two rows share a name, they are distinguished by power, 0–100, weight, clearance, or octane as in the data.

3 generation Sedan (2002-06-01 – 2005-01-31)

Versionhp (rpm)Nm (rpm)cm³FuelCyl / layoutBoostGearboxDrive
1.4 MT (11.6 s / 175 km/h / 140 mm / 95)94 (6300)131 (4400)1399Gasoline 954 InlineNoManual 5FWD
1.4 MT (10.7 s / 187 km/h / 151 mm / 92)94 (6200)130 (3400)1399Gasoline 924 InlineNoManual 5FWD
1.4 AT94 (6200)130 (3400)1399Gasoline 924 InlineNoAutomatic 4FWD
1.6 MT (10.7 s / 1180 kg)110 (5800)150 (4000)1598Gasoline 954 InlineNoManual 5FWD
1.6 MT (11.4 s / 1250 kg)110 (5800)150 (4000)1598Gasoline 954 InlineNoManual 5FWD
1.6 AT (12.7 s / 1180 kg)110 (5800)150 (4000)1598Gasoline 954 InlineNoAutomatic 4FWD
1.6 AT (13.7 s / 1250 kg)110 (5800)150 (4000)1598Gasoline 954 InlineNoAutomatic 4FWD
1.8 MT (9.5 s / 1210 kg)122 (5800)165 (4000)1799Gasoline 954 InlineNoManual 5FWD
1.8 MT (10.4 s / 1275 kg)122 (5800)165 (4000)1799Gasoline 954 InlineNoManual 5FWD
1.8 AT122 (5800)165 (4000)1799Gasoline 954 InlineNoAutomatic 4FWD
2.0 MT132 (5400)184 (4400)1998Gasoline 954 InlineNoManual 5FWD
2.0 AT132 (5400)184 (4400)1998Gasoline 954 InlineNoAutomatic 4FWD

Bore × stroke: 1.4 AT and the 92-octane 1.4 MT 77.9 × 73.4; 1.6 79 × 81.5; 1.8 81.6 × 86; 2.0 86 × 86. Compression: 1.4 AT / 1.6 / 2.0 9.5; 1.8 9.8; first 1.4 MT (95, 6300 rpm) compression not measured, bore not measured. Suspension Independent, spring front and rear; brakes Disc front and rear on every 3 generation row.

2 generation Sedan (1999-04-01 – 2002-03-31)

Versionhp (rpm)Nmcm³FuelGearboxNotes that split duplicates
1.5 MT110 (6200)140 (4200)149895Manual 51080 kg, 11.0 s, 185 km/h, 140 mm
1.6 MT106 (6000)145 (3400)159892Manual 51205 kg, 11.0 s, 185 km/h, 140 mm
1.6 AT (5800 rpm)106 (5800)145 (3800)159895Automatic 40–100 not measured, vmax not measured, 160 mm, kerb not measured, 1720 kg gross
1.6 AT (6000 rpm)106 (6000)145 (3400)159895Automatic 40–100 not measured, vmax not measured, 160 mm, 1860 kg gross
1.8 MT136 (5600)161 (4400)179692Manual 59.0 s, 195 km/h, 1155 kg
1.8 AT136 (5600)161 (4400)179692Automatic 410.5 s, 195 km/h, 1155 kg
2.0 MT (126 hp)126 (5400)180 (4400)199895Manual 59.0 s, 195 km/h, 1240 kg, 160 mm, 1720 kg gross
2.0 MT (126 hp, 1275 kg)126 (5400)180 (4400)199895Manual 59.5 s, 192 km/h, 1275 kg, 160 mm, 1860 kg gross
2.0 MT (133 hp)133 (5400)184 (4400)199892Manual 59.0 s, 195 km/h, 1215 kg, 140 mm
2.0 AT (126 hp, 186 km/h)126 (5400)180 (4400)199895Automatic 411.0 s, kerb not measured, 160 mm, 1720 kg gross
2.0 AT (126 hp, 183 km/h)126 (5400)180 (4400)199895Automatic 411.5 s, 1860 kg gross, 160 mm
2.0 AT (133 hp)133 (5400)184 (4400)199895Automatic 411.5 s, 186 km/h, 1250 kg, 140 mm

Engine location Front, transverse on the 1.5, 1.6 MT, 1.8, 2.0 133 hp rows; not measured on the 2.0 126 hp rows and both 1.6 AT rows.

1 generation Sedan (1997-02-01 – 1999-03-31)

Versionhp0–100vmaxFuelKerbWhat splits the name
1.5 MT11011.0185951080same figures as 2 generation 1.5 MT
1.6 MT (185 km/h)10611.0185921189mixed 8.8 l/100 km
1.6 MT (175 km/h)10611.0175921189same mix 8.8; −10 km/h vs the other 1.6 MT
1.6 AT (185 km/h)10613.0185921189mixed 9.8
1.6 AT (170 km/h)10613.0170921189−15 km/h vs the other 1.6 AT
1.8 MT1369.0195921155city/highway/mixed not measured
1.8 AT13610.5195921155city/highway/mixed not measured
2.0 MT (195 km/h)1339.0195921200mixed 9.5; city 13.5; highway 8.2
2.0 MT (185 km/h)1339.0185921200same consumption; −10 km/h
2.0 AT (190 km/h / 1200 kg)13311.0190951200mixed 10.5; city 15.5; highway 7.7
2.0 AT (180 km/h / 1260 kg)13311.5180951260mixed 10.2; city 15.1; highway 7.4; gross 1860

Performance and economy

Fastest 0–100 in the catalogue: 9.0 s — 1 generation / 2 generation 1.8 MT (136 hp) and 2.0 MT (133 hp and the 126 hp / 1240 kg row). 3 generation never lists 9.0 s: its floor is 9.5 s on 1.8 MT (1210 kg) and 2.0 MT.

Slowest measured 0–100: 3 generation 1.4 AT at 14.3 s — 2.7 s slower than the 11.6 s 1.4 MT (95, 140 mm) and 3.6 s slower than the 10.7 s 1.4 MT (92, 151 mm). Automatic penalty elsewhere: 1.6 +2.0 s (10.7 vs 12.7) or +2.3 s (11.4 vs 13.7); 1.8 +1.2 s (9.5 vs 10.7); 2.0 +1.2 s (9.5 vs 10.7). 2 generation 1.8 AT is +1.5 s versus 1.8 MT (10.5 vs 9.0) with the same 195 km/h. 1 generation 1.6 AT is +2.0 s versus 1.6 MT (13.0 vs 11.0).

Top speed: 195 km/h is the ceiling — 1.8 MT, 1.8 AT, and several 2.0 MT rows in 1 generation / 2 generation. 3 generation peaks at 194 km/h (1.8 MT, 2.0 MT). Automatics in 3 generation cap 1.8 AT and 2.0 AT at 184 km/h (−10 km/h versus the matching manuals). Lowest measured vmax: 1 generation 1.6 AT (170 km/h). 2 generation 1.6 AT vmax not measured.

Fuel (l/100 km) — only where measured:

2 generation has no city, highway, or mixed figure on any version — all not measured. CO2 and eco class are not measured on every Nubira row.

Tank range arithmetic where mixed is known: 3 generation 60 l ÷ 7.1 × 100 ≈ 845 km on both 1.4 MT mixed figures; 60 / 7.5 × 100 = 800 km on 2.0 MT / heavier 1.8 MT; 60 / 9.1 × 100 ≈ 659 km on 2.0 AT. 1 generation 62 / 8.8 × 100 ≈ 705 km (1.6 MT); 62 / 10.5 × 100 ≈ 590 km (2.0 AT 1200 kg).

Dimensions and weight

Kerb / kg per hp (where kerb is measured):

Kerb not measured: 3 generation 1.4 AT, 3 generation 2.0 AT, 2 generation both 1.6 AT, 2 generation 2.0 AT (126 hp, 186 km/h).

Gross weight is usually 1660–1720 kg. Heavier 1860 kg rows: 2 generation 2.0 AT (183 km/h), 2.0 MT (1275 kg), 1.6 AT (6000 rpm); 1 generation 2.0 AT (1260 kg). 3 generation heaviest listed gross: 1790 kg on 1.8 MT (1275 kg kerb); 1.6 1250 kg rows 1765 kg. Lightest 3 generation gross: 1660 kg (1.4 AT and 92-octane 1.4 MT).

Ground clearance: 140 mm is the default. 151 mm on 3 generation 1.4 AT, 92-octane 1.4 MT, 2.0 AT, 2.0 MT (+11 mm). 160 mm on several 2 generation 2.0 126 hp and 1.6 AT rows (+20 mm vs 140). Wheels not measured everywhere. Tank 60 l (3 generation) or 62 l (1–2 generation).

Which version to choose

If the goal is the most performance per kilogram: 1 generation or 2 generation 1.8 MT (136 hp, 9.0 s, 195 km/h, 1155 kg, 8.49 kg/hp, 75.7 hp/l). 1.8 AT keeps 136 hp and 195 km/h and adds 1.5 s. Fuel for both is not measured. Octane 92.

If the goal is the lightest small engine: 1.5 MT at 1080 kg, 110 hp, 11.0 s, 185 km/h — 100 kg lighter than any 3 generation 1.4 MT / 1.6 MT at 1180 kg, and 16 hp above the 1.4. Consumption not measured.

If you want a 3 generation car and a measured mixed figure with a manual: 2.0 MT (132 hp, 9.5 s, 194 km/h, 7.5 mixed, 1210 kg, 151 mm) and the heavier 1.8 MT (122 hp, 10.4 s, 194 km/h, 7.5 mixed, 1275 kg, 140 mm) share the same 7.5 mixed. The 2.0 MT is 10 hp up, 0.9 s quicker, +11 mm clearance, 65 kg lighter. The lighter 1.8 MT (9.5 s, 1210 kg) matches the 2.0 MT’s 9.5 s but its consumption is not measured.

If you want an automatic in 3 generation: 1.8 AT (122 hp, 10.7 s, 184 km/h, 1235 kg) matches 2.0 AT (132 hp, 10.7 s, 184 km/h) on 0–100 and vmax; 2.0 AT adds 10 hp and 19 Nm and lists mixed 9.1 versus not measured for 1.8 AT. 1.6 AT is 110 hp: 12.7 s at 1180 kg or 13.7 s at 1250 kg, both 187 km/h. 1.4 AT is the slowest automatic (14.3 s) but is the only 1.4 automatic and runs 92.

If you want the cheapest-feeling 3 generation engine on paper: the two 1.4 MT rows. Same 94 hp. The 95-octane / 6300 rpm / 140 mm row is 11.6 s and 175 km/h, mixed 7.1. The 92-octane / 6200 rpm / 151 mm row is 10.7 s and 187 km/h, mixed also 7.1, +11 mm clearance. The 92-octane manual is the quicker 1.4 by 0.9 s and 12 km/h. 1.4 AT gives up 3.6 s versus that manual.

If you are comparing 1.6 across generations: 3 generation 1.6 is 110 hp vs 106 hp (+4). 0–100 on the lighter 3 generation 1.6 MT is 10.7 s versus 11.0 s on 1 generation / 2 generation 1.6 MT (−0.3 s). The heavier 3 generation 1.6 MT is 11.4 s — 0.4 s slower than the older 11.0 s cars despite +4 hp, because kerb is 1250 vs 1189 or 1205. Mixed: 3 generation 1250 kg 1.6 MT 7.8 vs 1 generation 1.6 MT 8.8 (−1.0 l). 2 generation 1.6 consumption not measured.

If you want a 2.0: skip the 126 hp 2 generation rows if 133 hp is available — that is +7 hp and +4 Nm (180 vs 184) at the same 1998 cm³. 3 generation 2.0 is 132 hp, one below 133, with the only mixed figures in the 2.0 family besides 1 generation. 1 generation 2.0 MT mixed 9.5 versus 3 generation 2.0 MT mixed 7.5 (−2.0 l). 1 generation 2.0 AT mixed 10.2–10.5 versus 3 generation 2.0 AT 9.1.

If clearance matters: 2 generation 160 mm 2.0 (126 hp) and 1.6 AT rows beat 151 mm 3 generation 2.0 / 1.4 AT / 92-octane 1.4 MT, which beat the 140 mm majority.

If you need consumption written down before you buy: 2 generation cannot be compared on mpg at all (every figure not measured). Use 1 generation 1.6 / 2.0 rows or 3 generation 1.4 MT, heavier 1.6, heavier 1.8 MT, and both 2.0 rows.

Reliability / problems: this dataset has no failure rates, no service intervals, and no owner-fault lists. The only mechanical splits you can score are gearbox type (Manual 5 vs Automatic 4), octane (92 vs 95), clearance (140 / 151 / 160 mm), and whether kerb and consumption were measured. Suspension and brakes do not differentiate versions: Independent, spring and Disc on the rows that list them.

Short map: peak kg/hp and hp/l → early 1.8 MT. Lightest → 1.5 MT. Latest generation with measured mixed and 9.5 s → 3 generation 2.0 MT. Latest small engine with measured mixed → 1.4 MT (pick the 92-octane 10.7 s / 151 mm row if those figures match the car in front of you). Avoid treating two cars with the same badge as the same car: 1.4 MT, 1.6 MT, 1.6 AT, 1.8 MT, 2.0 MT, and 2.0 AT each appear more than once with different seconds, kilograms, millimetres, or horsepower.