Chrysler Concorde: Which Version to Buy and Why
The Chrysler Concorde was offered as a Sedan across two generations, with production running from 1992 to 2004. For buyers comparing versions, the main divide is clear: the first generation has two larger-capacity engines and 150 mm of ground clearance, while the second generation has six listed versions, more performance data, a 64-liter tank instead of 68 liters, and 130 mm of clearance.
The Chrysler Concorde was offered as a Sedan across two generations, with production running from 1992 to 2004. For buyers comparing versions, the main divide is clear: the first generation has two larger-capacity engines and 150 mm of ground clearance, while the second generation has six listed versions, more performance data, a 64-liter tank instead of 68 liters, and 130 mm of clearance. Every Concorde version in the catalogue uses a Gasoline, naturally aspirated, V-shaped 6-cylinder engine, a 4-speed Automatic gearbox, and FWD.
Chrysler Concorde generations compared
The first-generation Chrysler Concorde was produced from 1992 to 1997 as a Sedan. Its two versions are the 3.3 AT with 163 hp and the 3.5 AT with 214 hp. Both have a 68-liter fuel tank, 150 mm of ground clearance, independent spring suspension at both ends, ventilated front discs, and rear discs. Kerb weight is 1,534 kg for the 3.3 AT and 1,542 kg for the 3.5 AT, a difference of only 8 kg despite the 51 hp advantage of the larger engine.
The second-generation Chrysler Concorde was produced from 1998 to 2004 as a Sedan and includes six listed versions. The range begins with the 203 hp 2.7 AT, continues with two 3.2 AT versions producing 223 hp and 228 hp, and includes three 3.5 AT versions producing 237 hp, 253 hp, and 258 hp. All use a 64-liter tank and have 130 mm of ground clearance. Compared with the first generation, that means 4 liters less fuel capacity and 20 mm less clearance.
Chrysler Concorde engine options and specs
Repeated version names are distinguished by horsepower because the database contains two different 3.2 AT specifications and three different 3.5 AT specifications.
| Generation | Version | Power | Torque | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1992–1997 | 3.3 AT | 163 hp | 245 Nm | 3,301 cc | 95 | 6 | V-shaped | No | 4-speed Automatic | FWD |
| 1992–1997 | 3.5 AT | 214 hp | 300 Nm | 3,518 cc | 92 | 6 | V-shaped | No | 4-speed Automatic | FWD |
| 1998–2004 | 2.7 AT | 203 hp | 258 Nm | 2,736 cc | 92 | 6 | V-shaped | No | 4-speed Automatic | FWD |
| 1998–2004 | 3.2 AT, 223 hp | 223 hp | 301 Nm | 3,231 cc | 92 | 6 | V-shaped | No | 4-speed Automatic | FWD |
| 1998–2004 | 3.2 AT, 228 hp | 228 hp | 305 Nm | 3,231 cc | 92 | 6 | V-shaped | No | 4-speed Automatic | FWD |
| 1998–2004 | 3.5 AT, 237 hp | 237 hp | 327 Nm | 3,518 cc | 92 | 6 | V-shaped | No | 4-speed Automatic | FWD |
| 1998–2004 | 3.5 AT, 253 hp | 253 hp | 339 Nm | 3,518 cc | 92 | 6 | V-shaped | No | 4-speed Automatic | FWD |
| 1998–2004 | 3.5 AT, 258 hp | 258 hp | 348 Nm | 3,518 cc | 95 | 6 | V-shaped | No | 4-speed Automatic | FWD |
Power per liter helps separate engines that otherwise appear close. The first-generation 3.3 AT produces about 49.4 hp per liter, while its 3.5 AT reaches about 60.8 hp per liter. In the second generation, the 2.7 AT delivers about 74.2 hp per liter. The two 3.2 AT versions produce approximately 69.0 and 70.6 hp per liter. The three 3.5 AT versions provide about 67.4, 71.9, and 73.3 hp per liter respectively.
The first-generation 3.5 AT therefore adds 51 hp and 55 Nm over the 3.3 AT while adding just 8 kg of kerb weight. Among the second-generation 3.2 AT choices, the 228 hp specification adds 5 hp and 4 Nm over the 223 hp specification. Moving from the 237 hp 3.5 AT to the 253 hp 3.5 AT adds 16 hp and 12 Nm, while the 258 hp 3.5 AT adds another 5 hp and 9 Nm over the 253 hp version.
Chrysler Concorde performance and fuel economy
| Generation | Version | 0–100 km/h | Top speed | City | Highway | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1992–1997 | 3.3 AT | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| 1992–1997 | 3.5 AT | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| 1998–2004 | 2.7 AT | 9.7 s | 216 km/h | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| 1998–2004 | 3.2 AT, 223 hp | 9.5 s | 210 km/h | 12.4 l/100 km | 8.1 l/100 km | 10.7 l/100 km |
| 1998–2004 | 3.2 AT, 228 hp | 9.5 s | 210 km/h | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| 1998–2004 | 3.5 AT, 237 hp | 8.0 s | 192 km/h | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| 1998–2004 | 3.5 AT, 253 hp | 7.8 s | 225 km/h | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| 1998–2004 | 3.5 AT, 258 hp | 7.4 s | 238 km/h | 12.4 l/100 km | 9.1 l/100 km | 10.9 l/100 km |
For acceleration, the 258 hp 3.5 AT is the strongest documented choice: its 7.4-second result is 2.3 seconds quicker than the 2.7 AT. It is also 0.4 seconds quicker than the 253 hp 3.5 AT and 0.6 seconds quicker than the 237 hp 3.5 AT. Its 238 km/h maximum is the highest listed figure.
The 223 hp and 228 hp 3.2 AT versions share the same measured 9.5-second acceleration and 210 km/h top speed despite their 5 hp difference. The 2.7 AT is 0.2 seconds slower to 100 km/h but has a 6 km/h higher listed maximum speed.
Only the 223 hp 3.2 AT and 258 hp 3.5 AT have complete fuel-consumption figures. Their city result is identical at 12.4 l/100 km. The 223 hp 3.2 AT uses 1.0 l/100 km less on the highway and 0.2 l/100 km less in combined driving than the 258 hp 3.5 AT. All other consumption results are not measured.
Chrysler Concorde dimensions, weight, and wheels
Exterior length, width, and height are not measured in the supplied data. The available size-related figures are kerb weight, gross weight, ground clearance, tank capacity, and wheel sizes.
| Generation | Version | Kerb weight | Gross weight | Ground clearance | Tank | Wheel sizes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1992–1997 | 3.3 AT | 1,534 kg | not measured | 150 mm | 68 l | not measured |
| 1992–1997 | 3.5 AT | 1,542 kg | not measured | 150 mm | 68 l | not measured |
| 1998–2004 | 2.7 AT | 1,580 kg | 2,120 kg | 130 mm | 64 l | 225/60 R16; 225/55 R17 |
| 1998–2004 | 3.2 AT, 223 hp | 1,602 kg | not measured | 130 mm | 64 l | 225/60 R16; 225/55 R17 |
| 1998–2004 | 3.2 AT, 228 hp | 1,580 kg | 2,140 kg | 130 mm | 64 l | 225/60 R16; 225/55 R17 |
| 1998–2004 | 3.5 AT, 237 hp | 1,580 kg | 2,140 kg | 130 mm | 64 l | 225/60 R17; 225/55 R17 |
| 1998–2004 | 3.5 AT, 253 hp | 1,656 kg | 2,195 kg | 130 mm | 64 l | not measured |
| 1998–2004 | 3.5 AT, 258 hp | 1,690 kg | not measured | 130 mm | 64 l | not measured |
Weight per horsepower makes the performance hierarchy easier to read. The first-generation 3.3 AT carries about 9.4 kg per hp, compared with about 7.2 kg per hp for the first-generation 3.5 AT. In the second generation, the figures are approximately 7.8 kg per hp for the 2.7 AT, 7.2 for the 223 hp 3.2 AT, 6.9 for the 228 hp 3.2 AT, 6.7 for the 237 hp 3.5 AT, 6.5 for the 253 hp 3.5 AT, and 6.6 for the 258 hp 3.5 AT.
Which Chrysler Concorde version should you buy?
For the strongest documented performance, choose the second-generation 3.5 AT with 258 hp. It combines the highest output, 348 Nm of torque, the quickest 0–100 km/h result, and the highest top speed. Its trade-offs are the highest kerb weight in the catalogue and slightly higher measured highway and combined consumption than the 223 hp 3.2 AT.
For the best measured balance of performance and economy, the second-generation 3.2 AT with 223 hp is the most fully documented option. It reaches 100 km/h in 9.5 seconds and has the lowest measured highway and combined consumption, although it gives up 35 hp and 47 Nm to the 258 hp 3.5 AT.
For a stronger power-to-weight figure without choosing the heaviest car, consider the second-generation 3.5 AT with 253 hp. At about 6.5 kg per hp, it has the best calculated weight-to-power ratio in the range and reaches 100 km/h in 7.8 seconds. Its fuel consumption and wheel sizes are not measured.
Between the two second-generation 3.2 AT entries, the 228 hp version is 22 kg lighter and offers 5 hp and 4 Nm more than the 223 hp version, while their measured acceleration and maximum speed are identical. However, only the 223 hp version has measured city, highway, and combined consumption.
For a first-generation car, the 3.5 AT is the numerical choice over the 3.3 AT: it provides 51 hp and 55 Nm more while weighing only 8 kg more. The first generation also offers 20 mm more ground clearance and a tank that holds 4 liters more than the second generation. Performance and consumption for both first-generation versions are not measured, so a comparison beyond the supplied engine, weight, clearance, and tank figures cannot be made reliably.