The catalogue lists one Chevrolet MW version, so the buying question is whether 1.3 AT matches the numbers — not which of several trims to pick.
The Chevrolet MW in this catalogue is one generation (2001-01-01 to 2010-12-31), Mini 5-doors, and one version: 1.3 AT. There is no second engine, no extra gearbox, and no later restyle listed as its own generation. A 2008, 2009, or 2010 search still lands on the same 1.3 AT figures.
The catalogue lists one Chevrolet MW version, so the buying question is whether 1.3 AT matches the numbers — not which of several trims to pick.
# Chevrolet MW which version to buy: 1.3 AT (2001–2010)
The Chevrolet MW in this catalogue is one generation (2001-01-01 to 2010-12-31), Mini 5-doors, and one version: 1.3 AT. There is no second engine, no extra gearbox, and no later restyle listed as its own generation. A 2008, 2009, or 2010 search still lands on the same 1.3 AT figures. If you need a different displacement, a manual, or another drive layout, this catalogue does not offer it on the MW.
Generations: what actually changed between years
1 generation (2001-01-01–2010-12-31), Mini 5-doors, 1 version. Production span is 10 calendar years on the same 1.3 AT card. The data do not split 2008 vs 2009 vs 2010 by horsepower, torque, weight, or gearbox. Year-of-build is not a measured upgrade here; it is the same 88 hp, 118 Nm, 1328 cm³, Automatic 4, FWD package with kerb mass 1010 kg.
No restyling block is listed inside this generation. Treat late-year ads as the same mechanical row unless a seller shows numbers that are not in this catalogue.
Chevrolet MW engine and specs: the only row
| Version | hp | Nm | Displacement (cm³) | Fuel | Cylinders | Layout | Boost | Gearbox | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.3 AT | 88 | 118 | 1328 | Gasoline | 4 | Inline | No | Automatic 4 | FWD |
1.3 AT is Gasoline, 4 Inline, 4 valves per cylinder, No boost, Distributed injection (multi-point), compression 9.5, bore × stroke 78 × 69.5, fuel 95. Peak 88 hp (65 kW) is at 6000 rpm; 118 Nm is at 3400 rpm. Engine position is not measured.
Derived from those figures only:
- 88 hp ÷ 1.328 L = 66.3 hp per litre
- 65 kW ÷ 1.328 L = 49.0 kW per litre
- 118 Nm ÷ 1.328 L = 88.9 Nm per litre
- 4 cylinders × 4 valves = 16 valves
- Stroke 69.5 mm vs bore 78 mm: stroke is 8.5 mm shorter than bore
There is no second MW engine to compare those ratios against. “Chevrolet MW engine” in this set means this 1328 cm³ Gasoline 4 Inline unit only.
Performance, mpg, and what is not measured
For 1.3 AT:
- 0–100: not measured
- Top speed: not measured
- City / highway / combined consumption: not measured
- CO2: not measured
- Eco class: not measured
You cannot rank 1.3 AT on acceleration or mpg from this catalogue. A “more economical year” of 2008–2010 is not supported: consumption is not measured on any year of this generation.
What you can rank is how hard the 1010 kg kerb mass asks the 88 hp to work: 1010 ÷ 88 = 11.5 kg per hp (1010 ÷ 65 = 15.5 kg per kW). That is a mass-to-power figure, not a 0–100 time.
Dimensions, weight, and payload
1.3 AT kerb 1010 kg, gross 1245 kg. Payload from those two: 1245 − 1010 = 235 kg. Ground clearance 155 mm. Fuel tank not measured. Wheel sizes not measured.
Front suspension Independent, spring; rear Dependent, spring. Front brakes Ventilated disc; rear Disc.
If the buying question is “will it carry more than another MW version?”, there is no other MW version. The only load number is 235 kg on 1.3 AT. Clearance 155 mm is the only ground-clearance figure; there is no taller or lower MW generation in the data.
Which version to choose
Choose 1.3 AT if you want the Chevrolet MW as listed: Mini 5-doors, Gasoline 1328 cm³, 88 hp / 118 Nm, Automatic 4, FWD, 1010 kg kerb, 155 mm clearance, 2001-01-01 to 2010-12-31.
There is no “other version” in this catalogue. You cannot trade 88 hp for a stronger MW, or Automatic 4 for another gearbox, or FWD for another drive. Searches that imply a Suzuki-badged twin, a modified MW, or an NFS-game car are outside these numbers.
What the single row actually buys, in arithmetic:
| Question | 1.3 AT |
|---|---|
| Power | 88 hp / 65 kW @ 6000 |
| Torque | 118 Nm @ 3400 |
| Specific output | 66.3 hp/L, 88.9 Nm/L |
| Mass per hp | 11.5 kg/hp |
| Extra mass to gross | 235 kg |
| Boost | No |
| Gears | 4 Automatic |
| Drive | FWD |
2008 vs 2009 vs 2010: same 1.3 AT spec. Picking a later calendar year does not add horsepower, litres, or a different gearbox in this dataset.
Modified MW: not a catalogue version. Any extra power or different wheels is outside measured data (wheels not measured; power is 88 hp as listed).
Reliability / problems: not measured. This article does not invent failure rates.
For sale / price: not in the data; this text does not discuss asking prices.
If 1.3 AT’s 88 hp, 11.5 kg/hp, 235 kg payload, Automatic 4, and FWD match the job, it is the MW to buy because it is the only MW version here. If you need measured 0–100, mpg, tank size, or a second engine, those fields are not measured or not listed — the next decision is another model, not another MW generation.