Chevrolet Lacetti: Which Version Should You Buy?
The Chevrolet Lacetti catalogue data covers one generation of the Estate 5-door, produced from 2004 to 2013, with 18 modifications in total and 12 shown here. Because there is no second generation to compare, the buying decision is mainly between the 1.4 MT, several distinct 1.6 MT, 1.6 AT, 1.8 MT and 1.8 AT specifications, and the turbocharged 2.0 MT diesel.
The Chevrolet Lacetti catalogue data covers one generation of the Estate 5-door, produced from 2004 to 2013, with 18 modifications in total and 12 shown here. Because there is no second generation to compare, the buying decision is mainly between the 1.4 MT, several distinct 1.6 MT, 1.6 AT, 1.8 MT and 1.8 AT specifications, and the turbocharged 2.0 MT diesel. The quickest listed choices are the 1.8 MT with 122 hp and the 2.0 MT with 121 hp, both reaching 100 km/h in 9.8 seconds. The lowest measured combined consumption belongs to the 2.0 MT diesel at 5.7 l/100 km, while the lightest listed car is the 1.4 MT at 1,170 kg.
Chevrolet Lacetti generation and versions
The first-generation Chevrolet Lacetti ran from 2004 to 2013 as an Estate 5-door. Its catalogue contains 18 modifications, of which 12 are represented in the supplied specifications. Every listed version uses FWD, and each has independent spring suspension at both ends, ventilated disc front brakes and disc rear brakes. No separate restyling or later generation is identified in the data.
Some modification names occur more than once but describe different specifications. The 1.8 MT is listed with 121 hp from 1,796 cc, 122 hp from 1,799 cc, and 122 hp from 1,796 cc. The two 1.8 AT entries likewise differ: one has 122 hp, 165 Nm and 1,799 cc, while the other has 122 hp, 169 Nm and 1,796 cc. The repeated 1.6 MT specifications also differ in performance, economy and weight, so buyers should compare the figures rather than the badge alone.
Chevrolet Lacetti engine specs
| Version | Power | Torque | Displacement | Fuel | Cylinders/layout | Boost | Gearbox | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 MT | 109 hp (80 kW) | 150 Nm | 1,598 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | No | Manual, 5-speed | FWD |
| 1.8 MT | 121 hp (89 kW) | 169 Nm | 1,796 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | No | Manual, 5-speed | FWD |
| 1.6 AT | 109 hp (80 kW) | 150 Nm | 1,598 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | No | Automatic, 4-speed | FWD |
| 1.8 MT | 122 hp (90 kW) | 165 Nm | 1,799 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | No | Manual, 5-speed | FWD |
| 1.8 AT | 122 hp (90 kW) | 165 Nm | 1,799 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | No | Automatic, 4-speed | FWD |
| 2.0 MT | 121 hp (89 kW) | 280 Nm | 1,991 cc | Diesel | 4, Inline | Turbo | Manual, 5-speed | FWD |
| 1.4 MT | 94 hp (70 kW) | 131 Nm | 1,399 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | No | Manual, 5-speed | FWD |
| 1.6 MT | 109 hp (80 kW) | 150 Nm | 1,598 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | No | Manual, 5-speed | FWD |
| 1.6 AT | 109 hp (80 kW) | 150 Nm | 1,598 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | No | Automatic, 4-speed | FWD |
| 1.8 AT | 122 hp (89 kW) | 169 Nm | 1,796 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | No | Automatic, 4-speed | FWD |
| 1.8 MT | 122 hp (89 kW) | 169 Nm | 1,796 cc | Gasoline | 4, Inline | No | Manual, 5-speed | FWD |
| 2.0 MT | 121 hp (89 kW) | 280 Nm | 1,991 cc | Diesel | 4, Inline | Turbo | Manual, 5-speed | FWD |
The 1.4 MT produces approximately 67.2 hp per litre. Each 109 hp 1.6 version produces approximately 68.2 hp per litre. The 121 hp, 1,796 cc 1.8 MT delivers approximately 67.4 hp per litre, while the 122 hp, 1,796 cc engine reaches approximately 67.9 hp per litre and the 122 hp, 1,799 cc engine approximately 67.8 hp per litre. The 2.0 MT diesel produces approximately 60.8 hp per litre but provides 280 Nm, which is 111 Nm more than the 169 Nm 1.8 and 115 Nm more than the 165 Nm 1.8.
Chevrolet Lacetti performance and mpg
| Version | 0–100 km/h | Top speed | City | Highway | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 MT, 1,250 kg | 11.4 s | 187 km/h | 10.1 l/100 km | 6.4 l/100 km | 7.8 l/100 km |
| 1.8 MT, 121 hp | 10.4 s | 194 km/h | 9.9 l/100 km | 5.9 l/100 km | 7.4 l/100 km |
| 1.6 AT, 160 mm clearance | 11.5 s | 175 km/h | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| 1.8 MT, 1,799 cc | 10.7 s | 189 km/h | 9.8 l/100 km | 6.2 l/100 km | 8.1 l/100 km |
| 1.8 AT, 1,799 cc | 11.9 s | 184 km/h | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| 2.0 MT, 1,355 kg | 9.8 s | 186 km/h | 7.1 l/100 km | 5.4 l/100 km | 10.0 l/100 km |
| 1.4 MT | 11.6 s | 175 km/h | 9.8 l/100 km | 5.7 l/100 km | 7.2 l/100 km |
| 1.6 MT, 1,175 kg | 10.7 s | 187 km/h | 9.2 l/100 km | 5.9 l/100 km | 7.1 l/100 km |
| 1.6 AT, 1,175 kg | 11.5 s | 175 km/h | 11.4 l/100 km | 6.1 l/100 km | 8.1 l/100 km |
| 1.8 AT, 1,796 cc | 10.9 s | 187 km/h | 12.2 l/100 km | 6.8 l/100 km | 8.8 l/100 km |
| 1.8 MT, 1,796 cc and 122 hp | 9.8 s | 195 km/h | 9.9 l/100 km | 5.9 l/100 km | 7.4 l/100 km |
| 2.0 MT, 1,280 kg | 9.8 s | 186 km/h | 7.1 l/100 km | 4.8 l/100 km | 5.7 l/100 km |
For a balanced Gasoline choice, the 1.6 MT weighing 1,175 kg is notable: it reaches 100 km/h in 10.7 seconds and records 7.1 l/100 km combined. Compared with the 1.6 AT of the same kerb weight, it is 0.8 seconds quicker and uses 1.0 l/100 km less on the combined cycle. Both produce 109 hp and 150 Nm.
The 122 hp, 1,796 cc 1.8 MT is the strongest measured Gasoline performer. It reaches 100 km/h in 9.8 seconds and 195 km/h, making it 1.1 seconds quicker and 8 km/h faster than the 122 hp 1.8 AT with the same displacement. Its combined consumption is also 1.4 l/100 km lower at 7.4 rather than 8.8 l/100 km.
The two listed 2.0 MT diesel records have identical engine output and acceleration but different economy and weight data. The 1,280 kg specification records 5.7 l/100 km combined. The 1,355 kg specification records 10.0 l/100 km combined, even though its city figure is 7.1 l/100 km and its highway figure is 5.4 l/100 km; these are the catalogue figures and should be checked carefully when identifying an individual car.
Chevrolet Lacetti dimensions, weight and wheel specs
Exterior length, width and height are not measured in the supplied data. The available size-related specifications are kerb weight, gross weight, ground clearance, fuel-tank capacity and, for selected versions, wheel size.
| Version | Kerb weight | Gross weight | Ground clearance | Tank | Wheel sizes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 MT, 1,250 kg | 1,250 kg | 1,765 kg | 145 mm | 60 l | not measured |
| 1.8 MT, 121 hp | 1,280 kg | 1,795 kg | 145 mm | 60 l | not measured |
| 1.6 AT, 160 mm clearance | not measured | not measured | 160 mm | 60 l | not measured |
| 1.8 MT, 1,799 cc | 1,280 kg | 1,795 kg | 145 mm | 60 l | 185/65 R14; 195/55 R15 |
| 1.8 AT, 1,799 cc | not measured | not measured | 160 mm | 60 l | not measured |
| 2.0 MT, 1,355 kg | 1,355 kg | 1,870 kg | 145 mm | 60 l | not measured |
| 1.4 MT | 1,170 kg | 1,645 kg | 145 mm | 60 l | 185/65 R14; 195/55 R15 |
| 1.6 MT, 1,175 kg | 1,175 kg | 1,650 kg | 145 mm | 60 l | not measured |
| 1.6 AT, 1,175 kg | 1,175 kg | 1,660 kg | 145 mm | 60 l | not measured |
| 1.8 AT, 1,796 cc | 1,210 kg | 1,705 kg | 145 mm | 60 l | not measured |
| 1.8 MT, 1,796 cc and 122 hp | 1,205 kg | 1,680 kg | 145 mm | 60 l | not measured |
| 2.0 MT, 1,280 kg | 1,280 kg | 1,755 kg | 145 mm | 60 l | not measured |
Weight per horsepower helps distinguish versions with similar outputs. The 1.4 MT carries about 12.45 kg per hp, the 1,175 kg 1.6 MT about 10.78 kg per hp, and the 1,205 kg 1.8 MT about 9.88 kg per hp. The 1,280 kg 2.0 MT diesel carries about 10.58 kg per hp, but its main numerical advantage is 280 Nm rather than its power-to-weight ratio.
Which Chevrolet Lacetti version should you buy?
Choose the 1.6 MT at 109 hp and 1,175 kg for the strongest all-round Gasoline compromise in the supplied figures. It combines 10.7-second acceleration with 7.1 l/100 km combined consumption, improving on the 1.4 MT by 0.9 seconds while using 0.1 l/100 km less. It also offers 18 hp and 19 Nm more than the 1.4 MT.
Choose the 1.8 MT with 122 hp, 169 Nm and 1,796 cc if Gasoline performance matters most. Its 9.8-second acceleration and 195 km/h maximum are the best Gasoline results listed, while combined consumption remains 7.4 l/100 km. Against the 1,175 kg 1.6 MT, it gains 13 hp and 19 Nm, cuts 0–100 km/h time by 0.9 seconds, and adds 8 km/h to top speed for an extra 0.3 l/100 km combined.
Choose the 2.0 MT diesel at 1,280 kg if measured fuel economy and torque lead the decision. It matches the quickest 9.8-second acceleration figure, delivers 280 Nm at 2,000 rpm and records 5.7 l/100 km combined. Compared with the quickest 1.8 MT, it has 1 hp less but 111 Nm more torque and consumes 1.7 l/100 km less on the combined cycle.
Choose a 1.6 AT or 1.8 AT only when the Automatic gearbox is the priority. The measured 1.6 AT trails the comparable 1.6 MT by 0.8 seconds to 100 km/h and consumes 1.0 l/100 km more combined. Among the measured 1.8 choices, the 1,796 cc 1.8 AT is 1.1 seconds slower and consumes 1.4 l/100 km more combined than the 122 hp 1.8 MT. For the other 1.6 AT and 1.8 AT records, fuel consumption and weight are not measured, so the data does not support a complete economy or weight comparison.
No catalogue evidence is supplied for Chevrolet Lacetti problems, ABS problems, central-locking problems, engine-oil requirements or reliability. Those subjects cannot be used to rank these versions from the provided data; the defensible choice must rest on the measured engine, performance, consumption, weight and clearance figures above.