Chevrolet Lacetti: Which Version Should You Buy?

The Chevrolet Lacetti catalogue data covers one generation of the Estate 5-door, produced from 2004 to 2013, with 18 modifications in total and 12 shown here. Because there is no second generation to compare, the buying decision is mainly between the 1.4 MT, several distinct 1.6 MT, 1.6 AT, 1.8 MT and 1.8 AT specifications, and the turbocharged 2.0 MT diesel.

The Chevrolet Lacetti catalogue data covers one generation of the Estate 5-door, produced from 2004 to 2013, with 18 modifications in total and 12 shown here. Because there is no second generation to compare, the buying decision is mainly between the 1.4 MT, several distinct 1.6 MT, 1.6 AT, 1.8 MT and 1.8 AT specifications, and the turbocharged 2.0 MT diesel. The quickest listed choices are the 1.8 MT with 122 hp and the 2.0 MT with 121 hp, both reaching 100 km/h in 9.8 seconds. The lowest measured combined consumption belongs to the 2.0 MT diesel at 5.7 l/100 km, while the lightest listed car is the 1.4 MT at 1,170 kg.

Chevrolet Lacetti generation and versions

The first-generation Chevrolet Lacetti ran from 2004 to 2013 as an Estate 5-door. Its catalogue contains 18 modifications, of which 12 are represented in the supplied specifications. Every listed version uses FWD, and each has independent spring suspension at both ends, ventilated disc front brakes and disc rear brakes. No separate restyling or later generation is identified in the data.

Some modification names occur more than once but describe different specifications. The 1.8 MT is listed with 121 hp from 1,796 cc, 122 hp from 1,799 cc, and 122 hp from 1,796 cc. The two 1.8 AT entries likewise differ: one has 122 hp, 165 Nm and 1,799 cc, while the other has 122 hp, 169 Nm and 1,796 cc. The repeated 1.6 MT specifications also differ in performance, economy and weight, so buyers should compare the figures rather than the badge alone.

Chevrolet Lacetti engine specs

VersionPowerTorqueDisplacementFuelCylinders/layoutBoostGearboxDrive
1.6 MT109 hp (80 kW)150 Nm1,598 ccGasoline4, InlineNoManual, 5-speedFWD
1.8 MT121 hp (89 kW)169 Nm1,796 ccGasoline4, InlineNoManual, 5-speedFWD
1.6 AT109 hp (80 kW)150 Nm1,598 ccGasoline4, InlineNoAutomatic, 4-speedFWD
1.8 MT122 hp (90 kW)165 Nm1,799 ccGasoline4, InlineNoManual, 5-speedFWD
1.8 AT122 hp (90 kW)165 Nm1,799 ccGasoline4, InlineNoAutomatic, 4-speedFWD
2.0 MT121 hp (89 kW)280 Nm1,991 ccDiesel4, InlineTurboManual, 5-speedFWD
1.4 MT94 hp (70 kW)131 Nm1,399 ccGasoline4, InlineNoManual, 5-speedFWD
1.6 MT109 hp (80 kW)150 Nm1,598 ccGasoline4, InlineNoManual, 5-speedFWD
1.6 AT109 hp (80 kW)150 Nm1,598 ccGasoline4, InlineNoAutomatic, 4-speedFWD
1.8 AT122 hp (89 kW)169 Nm1,796 ccGasoline4, InlineNoAutomatic, 4-speedFWD
1.8 MT122 hp (89 kW)169 Nm1,796 ccGasoline4, InlineNoManual, 5-speedFWD
2.0 MT121 hp (89 kW)280 Nm1,991 ccDiesel4, InlineTurboManual, 5-speedFWD

The 1.4 MT produces approximately 67.2 hp per litre. Each 109 hp 1.6 version produces approximately 68.2 hp per litre. The 121 hp, 1,796 cc 1.8 MT delivers approximately 67.4 hp per litre, while the 122 hp, 1,796 cc engine reaches approximately 67.9 hp per litre and the 122 hp, 1,799 cc engine approximately 67.8 hp per litre. The 2.0 MT diesel produces approximately 60.8 hp per litre but provides 280 Nm, which is 111 Nm more than the 169 Nm 1.8 and 115 Nm more than the 165 Nm 1.8.

Chevrolet Lacetti performance and mpg

Version0–100 km/hTop speedCityHighwayCombined
1.6 MT, 1,250 kg11.4 s187 km/h10.1 l/100 km6.4 l/100 km7.8 l/100 km
1.8 MT, 121 hp10.4 s194 km/h9.9 l/100 km5.9 l/100 km7.4 l/100 km
1.6 AT, 160 mm clearance11.5 s175 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
1.8 MT, 1,799 cc10.7 s189 km/h9.8 l/100 km6.2 l/100 km8.1 l/100 km
1.8 AT, 1,799 cc11.9 s184 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
2.0 MT, 1,355 kg9.8 s186 km/h7.1 l/100 km5.4 l/100 km10.0 l/100 km
1.4 MT11.6 s175 km/h9.8 l/100 km5.7 l/100 km7.2 l/100 km
1.6 MT, 1,175 kg10.7 s187 km/h9.2 l/100 km5.9 l/100 km7.1 l/100 km
1.6 AT, 1,175 kg11.5 s175 km/h11.4 l/100 km6.1 l/100 km8.1 l/100 km
1.8 AT, 1,796 cc10.9 s187 km/h12.2 l/100 km6.8 l/100 km8.8 l/100 km
1.8 MT, 1,796 cc and 122 hp9.8 s195 km/h9.9 l/100 km5.9 l/100 km7.4 l/100 km
2.0 MT, 1,280 kg9.8 s186 km/h7.1 l/100 km4.8 l/100 km5.7 l/100 km

For a balanced Gasoline choice, the 1.6 MT weighing 1,175 kg is notable: it reaches 100 km/h in 10.7 seconds and records 7.1 l/100 km combined. Compared with the 1.6 AT of the same kerb weight, it is 0.8 seconds quicker and uses 1.0 l/100 km less on the combined cycle. Both produce 109 hp and 150 Nm.

The 122 hp, 1,796 cc 1.8 MT is the strongest measured Gasoline performer. It reaches 100 km/h in 9.8 seconds and 195 km/h, making it 1.1 seconds quicker and 8 km/h faster than the 122 hp 1.8 AT with the same displacement. Its combined consumption is also 1.4 l/100 km lower at 7.4 rather than 8.8 l/100 km.

The two listed 2.0 MT diesel records have identical engine output and acceleration but different economy and weight data. The 1,280 kg specification records 5.7 l/100 km combined. The 1,355 kg specification records 10.0 l/100 km combined, even though its city figure is 7.1 l/100 km and its highway figure is 5.4 l/100 km; these are the catalogue figures and should be checked carefully when identifying an individual car.

Chevrolet Lacetti dimensions, weight and wheel specs

Exterior length, width and height are not measured in the supplied data. The available size-related specifications are kerb weight, gross weight, ground clearance, fuel-tank capacity and, for selected versions, wheel size.

VersionKerb weightGross weightGround clearanceTankWheel sizes
1.6 MT, 1,250 kg1,250 kg1,765 kg145 mm60 lnot measured
1.8 MT, 121 hp1,280 kg1,795 kg145 mm60 lnot measured
1.6 AT, 160 mm clearancenot measurednot measured160 mm60 lnot measured
1.8 MT, 1,799 cc1,280 kg1,795 kg145 mm60 l185/65 R14; 195/55 R15
1.8 AT, 1,799 ccnot measurednot measured160 mm60 lnot measured
2.0 MT, 1,355 kg1,355 kg1,870 kg145 mm60 lnot measured
1.4 MT1,170 kg1,645 kg145 mm60 l185/65 R14; 195/55 R15
1.6 MT, 1,175 kg1,175 kg1,650 kg145 mm60 lnot measured
1.6 AT, 1,175 kg1,175 kg1,660 kg145 mm60 lnot measured
1.8 AT, 1,796 cc1,210 kg1,705 kg145 mm60 lnot measured
1.8 MT, 1,796 cc and 122 hp1,205 kg1,680 kg145 mm60 lnot measured
2.0 MT, 1,280 kg1,280 kg1,755 kg145 mm60 lnot measured

Weight per horsepower helps distinguish versions with similar outputs. The 1.4 MT carries about 12.45 kg per hp, the 1,175 kg 1.6 MT about 10.78 kg per hp, and the 1,205 kg 1.8 MT about 9.88 kg per hp. The 1,280 kg 2.0 MT diesel carries about 10.58 kg per hp, but its main numerical advantage is 280 Nm rather than its power-to-weight ratio.

Which Chevrolet Lacetti version should you buy?

Choose the 1.6 MT at 109 hp and 1,175 kg for the strongest all-round Gasoline compromise in the supplied figures. It combines 10.7-second acceleration with 7.1 l/100 km combined consumption, improving on the 1.4 MT by 0.9 seconds while using 0.1 l/100 km less. It also offers 18 hp and 19 Nm more than the 1.4 MT.

Choose the 1.8 MT with 122 hp, 169 Nm and 1,796 cc if Gasoline performance matters most. Its 9.8-second acceleration and 195 km/h maximum are the best Gasoline results listed, while combined consumption remains 7.4 l/100 km. Against the 1,175 kg 1.6 MT, it gains 13 hp and 19 Nm, cuts 0–100 km/h time by 0.9 seconds, and adds 8 km/h to top speed for an extra 0.3 l/100 km combined.

Choose the 2.0 MT diesel at 1,280 kg if measured fuel economy and torque lead the decision. It matches the quickest 9.8-second acceleration figure, delivers 280 Nm at 2,000 rpm and records 5.7 l/100 km combined. Compared with the quickest 1.8 MT, it has 1 hp less but 111 Nm more torque and consumes 1.7 l/100 km less on the combined cycle.

Choose a 1.6 AT or 1.8 AT only when the Automatic gearbox is the priority. The measured 1.6 AT trails the comparable 1.6 MT by 0.8 seconds to 100 km/h and consumes 1.0 l/100 km more combined. Among the measured 1.8 choices, the 1,796 cc 1.8 AT is 1.1 seconds slower and consumes 1.4 l/100 km more combined than the 122 hp 1.8 MT. For the other 1.6 AT and 1.8 AT records, fuel consumption and weight are not measured, so the data does not support a complete economy or weight comparison.

No catalogue evidence is supplied for Chevrolet Lacetti problems, ABS problems, central-locking problems, engine-oil requirements or reliability. Those subjects cannot be used to rank these versions from the provided data; the defensible choice must rest on the measured engine, performance, consumption, weight and clearance figures above.