Cadillac Optiq: Which Version Should You Buy?

The Cadillac Optiq has two electric versions in its first generation, both named 79,7kWt in the catalogue. The 245 hp 79,7kWt uses FWD, produces 330 Nm, reaches 100 km/h in 7 seconds, and has a kerb weight of 2,130 kg. The 300 hp 79,7kWt adds AWD, raises output to 480 Nm, cuts the 0–100 km/h time to 5.97 seconds, and weighs 2,300 kg.

The Cadillac Optiq has two electric versions in its first generation, both named 79,7kWt in the catalogue. The 245 hp 79,7kWt uses FWD, produces 330 Nm, reaches 100 km/h in 7 seconds, and has a kerb weight of 2,130 kg. The 300 hp 79,7kWt adds AWD, raises output to 480 Nm, cuts the 0–100 km/h time to 5.97 seconds, and weighs 2,300 kg. Choose the 245 hp version if lower weight matters more; choose the 300 hp version if AWD, stronger performance, and greater torque are the priorities. Price, lease, range, and charging figures are not measured in the supplied data, so they cannot decide this comparison.

Cadillac Optiq generations and available versions

The Cadillac Optiq has one generation, introduced in May 2024 and still in production according to the catalogue data. It is an SUV 5-doors with two versions. Because both versions carry the exact database name 79,7kWt, they must be distinguished by their power outputs: 79,7kWt with 245 hp and 79,7kWt with 300 hp.

There is no second generation or restyling in the supplied data, so there are no generational changes to compare. The buying decision is entirely between the two versions of the first-generation Optiq.

Cadillac Optiq engine options and specs

Both Optiq versions use an Electro powertrain and an Automatic gearbox with 1 gear. Engine displacement, cylinder count, cylinder layout, and boost are not measured for either version. The principal specification difference is the drivetrain: the 245 hp version is FWD, while the 300 hp version is AWD.

Exact version nameIdentificationPowerTorqueDisplacementFuelCylindersLayoutBoostGearboxDrive
79,7kWt245 hp245 hp / 180 kW330 Nmnot measuredElectronot measurednot measurednot measuredAutomatic, 1 gearFWD
79,7kWt300 hp300 hp / 220 kW480 Nmnot measuredElectronot measurednot measurednot measuredAutomatic, 1 gearAWD

The AWD 79,7kWt supplies 55 hp and 150 Nm more than the FWD 79,7kWt. In percentage terms, that is about 22.4% more horsepower and 45.5% more torque. Its output is also 40 kW higher. Power per litre cannot be calculated because displacement is not measured for either electric powertrain.

Searches for a Cadillac Optiq gas engine do not describe either catalogue version: both listed powertrains use Electro fuel. No engine-cover or engine-bay specifications are measured in the supplied data.

Cadillac Optiq performance, speed, and economy

Exact version nameIdentification0–100 km/hTop speedCity consumptionHighway consumptionCombined consumptionCO₂
79,7kWt245 hp, FWD7 seconds180 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured0
79,7kWt300 hp, AWD5.97 seconds180 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured0

The 300 hp AWD version reaches 100 km/h 1.03 seconds sooner than the 245 hp FWD version, an improvement of about 14.7%. Both have the same measured maximum speed of 180 km/h, so the more powerful model’s advantage is acceleration rather than top speed.

A 0–60 mph time is not measured in the supplied data; only 0–100 km/h performance is available. City, highway, and combined consumption are also not measured for either version. Electric range is not measured, so no range-based recommendation can be made. The recorded CO₂ figure is 0 for both versions.

Cadillac Optiq dimensions, weight, and wheels

Overall exterior dimensions are not measured for either Cadillac Optiq version. Ground clearance and tank capacity are also not measured. The available comparison therefore rests on kerb weight, gross weight, and wheel sizes.

Exact version nameIdentificationKerb weightGross weightGround clearanceTankWheel sizes
79,7kWt245 hp, FWD2,130 kg2,587 kgnot measurednot measured245/50 R20; 275/40 R21
79,7kWt300 hp, AWD2,300 kg2,758 kgnot measurednot measured245/50 R20; 275/40 R21

The AWD model is 170 kg heavier in both kerb and gross terms. Despite that additional mass, it has a better weight-to-power ratio: approximately 7.67 kg per horsepower, compared with approximately 8.69 kg per horsepower for the FWD model. Put another way, the FWD version provides about 115 hp per tonne of kerb weight, while the AWD version provides about 130 hp per tonne.

The difference between gross and kerb weight is 457 kg for the 245 hp version and 458 kg for the 300 hp version. Both list the same wheel choices, 245/50 R20 and 275/40 R21, so wheel size does not separate the two versions on the supplied specifications.

Both versions use Independent, spring front and rear suspension. Each has Ventilated disc front brakes and Disc rear brakes. No suspension or brake distinction is recorded between them.

Which Cadillac Optiq version should you choose?

Choose the 79,7kWt with 245 hp and FWD if you want the lighter specification. At 2,130 kg, it saves 170 kg over the AWD version while retaining the same 180 km/h top speed, wheel choices, suspension descriptions, and brake types. Its 330 Nm output and 7-second 0–100 km/h time are lower-performance figures, but nothing in the data indicates a penalty in maximum speed.

Choose the 79,7kWt with 300 hp and AWD if performance and drivetrain capability matter more than mass. It provides 55 additional horsepower, 40 additional kilowatts, and 150 additional newton-metres. It also accelerates to 100 km/h 1.03 seconds faster and improves the weight-to-power ratio by about 1.02 kg per horsepower. AWD is exclusive to this version in the catalogue.

The supplied data contains no Cadillac Optiq price, lease payment, lease deal, or vehicle-for-sale information. Consequently, it is not possible to say how much extra money the 300 hp version costs or calculate a value-per-horsepower comparison. What any additional price buys in specification terms is clear: AWD, 55 hp more, 150 Nm more, and quicker acceleration, accompanied by 170 kg of additional kerb weight.

For buyers deciding only from the available numbers, the 245 hp 79,7kWt is the weight-focused choice, while the 300 hp 79,7kWt is the stronger all-round performance choice. Range, consumption, dimensions, ground clearance, and pricing are not measured, so claims based on those factors would go beyond the catalogue data.