Sealion 07 specs: the four versions side by side

All four share Electro fuel, Automatic with 1 gear, independent spring suspension front and rear, ventilated disc front brakes, and Disc ventilated rear brakes. CO2 is 0 on every version. Chassis geometry, tank, and wheels are not measured across the board.

VersionhpkWNmDisplacementFuelCylindersLayoutBoostGearboxGearsDrive
AT 71,8231169380not measuredElectronot measurednot measurednot measuredAutomatic1RWD
AT 82,5313229not measurednot measuredElectronot measurednot measurednot measuredAutomatic1RWD
AT 91,3313229not measurednot measuredElectronot measurednot measurednot measuredAutomatic1RWD
AT 91,3 AWD530389not measurednot measuredElectronot measurednot measurednot measuredAutomatic1AWD

All four share Electro fuel, Automatic with 1 gear, independent spring suspension front and rear, ventilated disc front brakes, and Disc ventilated rear brakes. CO2 is 0 on every version. Chassis geometry, tank, and wheels are not measured across the board.

Engine power: what the name steps actually buy

AT 71,8 is the only version with a published torque figure: 380 Nm at 231 hp (169 kW). It is the weakest Sealion 07 in this list and the only one where horsepower and torque can be read together.

AT 82,5 is 313 hp (229 kW). That is 82 hp and 60 kW more than AT 71,8 (313 − 231 and 229 − 169). Torque on AT 82,5 is not measured, so you cannot compute a Nm gain. Displacement is not measured on both, so power-per-litre is not a valid metric here: there is no engine capacity in cc to divide by. Searches for “engine size,” “engine cc,” and “engine capacity” hit a blank in these data — not measured, not a petrol block that was omitted.

AT 91,3 is also 313 hp and 229 kW. Versus AT 82,5, the power step is 0 hp. The name changes; the catalogue horsepower does not. Torque on AT 91,3 is not measured. If you are shopping horsepower, AT 82,5 and AT 91,3 are the same engine-power row.

AT 91,3 AWD is 530 hp (389 kW). Versus AT 91,3 that is +217 hp and +160 kW (530 − 313, 389 − 229). Versus AT 71,8 it is +299 hp and +220 kW. It is the only AWD Sealion 07 in this generation. Torque is not measured, so “hp and Nm” together exist only for AT 71,8.

There is no second generation to compare engines against. Production start is 2023-11-01 for all four; stop is null. A 2025 or 2026 buyer in this catalogue is still looking at the same four 1 generation rows.

Performance: 0–100 and top speed, version by version

AT 71,8: 7.3 s to 100 km/h, 210 km/h top speed. AT 82,5: 6.7 s, 215 km/h. AT 91,3: 6.9 s, 215 km/h. AT 91,3 AWD: 4.5 s, 215 km/h.

Arithmetic that matters for a choice:

City, highway, and combined consumption are not measured on all four. There is no mpg table to rank. Fuel tank is not measured (electric; no tank figure). Economy cannot decide the purchase from this catalogue.

Dimensions and weight: only AT 71,8 is fully weighed

Kerb weight 2155 kg and gross weight 2530 kg are published only for AT 71,8. Payload on that version is 375 kg (2530 − 2155). Weight per horsepower on AT 71,8 is 2155 / 231 ≈ 9.33 kg/hp.

Kerb and gross weight for AT 82,5, AT 91,3, and AT 91,3 AWD are not measured. You cannot compute kg/hp for the three stronger cars, and you cannot claim the AWD car is heavier. Ground clearance is not measured. Wheel sizes are not measured. Exterior dimensions (length/width/height/wheelbase) are not measured. Searches for “dimensions Australia” and similar cannot be answered from these numbers.

What is shared: independent spring front and rear; ventilated disc front; Disc ventilated rear; CO2 0. Chassis type does not separate the four versions in this file.

Which version to choose

Choose AT 71,8 if you want the only row with a complete power-and-mass picture: 231 hp, 169 kW, 380 Nm, RWD, 7.3 s, 210 km/h, 2155 kg kerb, 2530 kg gross. It is the slowest and least powerful Sealion 07 here. It is also the only version where torque and weight are not gaps. If you need a number for payload or kg/hp, this is the only version that supplies it.

Choose AT 82,5 if you want more power than AT 71,8 without moving to AWD. You gain 82 hp and 60 kW, cut 0.6 s off 0–100, and add 5 km/h on top speed, still RWD, still Automatic 1, still Electro. You lose the torque figure and both weight figures — those become not measured. For a rear-drive buyer who ranks sprint over a published Nm, this is the first step that actually moves the stopwatch.

Do not choose AT 91,3 over AT 82,5 for horsepower. Both are 313 hp / 229 kW, both RWD, both 215 km/h. AT 91,3 is 0.2 s slower to 100 (6.9 vs 6.7). In this catalogue the 91,3 label on the RWD car does not buy more engine power than AT 82,5. Torque, weight, tank, clearance, and wheels remain not measured on both. If the decision is engine power and 0–100, AT 82,5 matches or beats AT 91,3 on every measured performance number.

Choose AT 91,3 AWD if the point of the purchase is drive and peak output. It is the only AWD version. It is 530 hp / 389 kW: 217 hp more than either 313 hp RWD car, 299 hp more than AT 71,8. It is the only Sealion 07 under 5 s to 100 (4.5 s). Top speed stays 215 km/h — the extra 217 hp versus AT 91,3 does not raise the limiter in these data. Torque and weight are not measured, so you cannot check whether the AWD car’s kg/hp is better than AT 71,8’s 9.33 kg/hp. You are buying drive type and a 2.4 s 0–100 cut versus the RWD AT 91,3, not a higher top speed and not a published mass.

What this generation does not split on

There is no restyle and no second generation in the data. 1 generation, SUV Coupe, four modifications, all from 2023-11-01. Gearbox type does not change (Automatic, 1). Fuel does not change (Electro). Brakes and suspension labels do not change. CO2 is 0 on all four. Cylinder count, layout, boost, displacement, engine position, and feed system are not measured — do not infer a petrol “engine bay” layout from the names.

Price in China, India, the Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, the UK, or Australia is not in these data and cannot be used to say what “extra money” buys in currency. The only “extra” that can be counted is extra hp, extra kW, a change from RWD to AWD, and a change in 0–100 and top speed as listed above.

Short rule from the numbers: AT 71,8 for the only complete weight-and-torque sheet; AT 82,5 for the cheaper-to-explain RWD power step (+82 hp, −0.6 s); skip AT 91,3 if the goal is more horsepower than AT 82,5 (it is not); take AT 91,3 AWD only if 530 hp and AWD and 4.5 s are the point of the car.