BYD G6: Which Version Should You Buy?

The BYD G6 was offered as a Sedan from 2011 to 2013 in a single generation, with three versions: 1.5 MT, 1.5 DSG, and 2.0 MT. For most buyers comparing the specifications, the decisive choice is between the two turbocharged 1.5-litre versions: both produce 152 hp and 240 Nm, reach 100 km/h in 9.7 seconds, and have combined fuel consumption of 6.7 l/100 km.

The BYD G6 was offered as a Sedan from 2011 to 2013 in a single generation, with three versions: 1.5 MT, 1.5 DSG, and 2.0 MT. For most buyers comparing the specifications, the decisive choice is between the two turbocharged 1.5-litre versions: both produce 152 hp and 240 Nm, reach 100 km/h in 9.7 seconds, and have combined fuel consumption of 6.7 l/100 km. Choose 1.5 MT for a 6-speed Manual gearbox and the lowest stated highway consumption, or 1.5 DSG for a 6-speed Robotic gearbox and the lowest stated city consumption. The naturally aspirated 2.0 MT is less powerful, slower, and less economical, although its 5-speed Manual transmission may still determine the choice for someone specifically seeking that configuration. Price figures are not measured, so the available data cannot show whether any version commands a justified premium.

BYD G6 generations and facelift

The BYD G6 has 1 generation in the supplied catalogue data. The 1 generation ran from 2011 to 2013, used a Sedan body, and contained three versions. There is no separate facelift entry in the data, so no specification changes can be attributed to a BYD G6 facelift.

Although searches may refer to a BYD G6 SUV or a BYD G6 2018, the supplied model record contains only the 2011–2013 Sedan. Consequently, there is no second generation to compare and no generation-to-generation change to quantify. The meaningful buying comparison is between the three versions within 1 generation.

BYD G6 engine and gearbox specs

VersionPowerTorqueDisplacementFuelCylinders and layoutBoostGearboxDrive
1.5 MT152 hp (111 kW) at 5200 rpm240 Nm at 1750–3500 rpm1497 ccGasoline, 924, Inline; 4 valves per cylinderTurbo6-speed ManualFWD
1.5 DSG152 hp (112 kW) at 5200 rpm240 Nm at 1750 rpm1497 ccGasoline, 924, Inline; 4 valves per cylinderTurbo6-speed RoboticFWD
2.0 MT140 hp (103 kW) at 6000 rpm186 Nm at 4500–4000 rpm1991 ccGasoline, 924, Inline; 4 valves per cylinderNo5-speed ManualFWD

All three engines are mounted Front, transverse and use Distributed injection (multi-point). The 1.5 MT and 1.5 DSG share the same 1497 cc turbocharged engine output, while the 2.0 MT has 494 cc more displacement but no boost. Despite that greater displacement, the 2.0 MT produces 12 hp and 54 Nm less than either 1.5-litre version.

Power per litre makes the contrast especially clear. Both 1.5 MT and 1.5 DSG deliver approximately 101.5 hp per litre, whereas the 2.0 MT delivers approximately 70.3 hp per litre. The turbo versions therefore produce about 31.2 more hp per litre.

The 1.5 DSG has a stated compression ratio of 10. Compression ratio is not measured for 1.5 MT or 2.0 MT. Bore and stroke are not measured for any version.

BYD G6 performance and fuel economy

Version0–100 km/hTop speedCityHighwayCombined
1.5 MT9.7 s200 km/h8.9 l/100 km5.4 l/100 km6.7 l/100 km
1.5 DSG9.7 s200 km/h8.7 l/100 km6.5 l/100 km6.7 l/100 km
2.0 MT12.5 s185 km/h11.1 l/100 km6.7 l/100 km8.3 l/100 km

The 1.5 MT and 1.5 DSG are equal in the stated headline performance figures: each accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 9.7 seconds and reaches 200 km/h. The 2.0 MT needs 12.5 seconds, making it 2.8 seconds slower to 100 km/h, and its 185 km/h maximum is 15 km/h lower.

For predominantly urban use, 1.5 DSG records the lowest city consumption at 8.7 l/100 km. That is 0.2 l/100 km below 1.5 MT and 2.4 l/100 km below 2.0 MT.

For regular highway driving, 1.5 MT has the strongest economy figure at 5.4 l/100 km. It uses 1.1 l/100 km less than 1.5 DSG and 1.3 l/100 km less than 2.0 MT on the highway.

Both turbo versions are rated at 6.7 l/100 km combined. The 2.0 MT requires 8.3 l/100 km combined, a difference of 1.6 l/100 km. CO₂ emissions and environmental class are not measured for 1.5 MT, 1.5 DSG, or 2.0 MT.

BYD G6 dimensions, weight, ground clearance, and wheels

VersionKerb weightGross weightGround clearanceFuel tankWheel sizes
1.5 MT1450 kg1825 kg150 mm65 lnot measured
1.5 DSG1450 kg1825 kg150 mm65 lnot measured
2.0 MT1440 kg1815 kg150 mm65 lnot measured

The two turbocharged versions have identical listed weights. At 1450 kg and 152 hp, both 1.5 MT and 1.5 DSG carry approximately 9.54 kg per horsepower. The 2.0 MT is 10 kg lighter, but its lower output gives it approximately 10.29 kg per horsepower. In other words, the small weight advantage does not offset its 12 hp deficit in this comparison.

Every version has 150 mm of ground clearance and a 65 l fuel tank, so neither measurement distinguishes one configuration from another. Wheel sizes are not measured for all three versions.

Independent, spring suspension is specified at both the front and rear of every version. Ventilated disc front brakes are also common to all three. Rear Disc brakes are listed for 1.5 DSG; rear brake type is not measured for 1.5 MT or 2.0 MT.

BYD G6 interior, reliability, and problems

Interior specifications are not measured in the supplied data, so the three versions cannot be ranked for cabin equipment, space, materials, or comfort. Reliability records and known problems are also not measured. A purchase decision based on those factors requires information beyond this catalogue entry; the available comparison supports conclusions only about engines, transmissions, performance, consumption, weight, clearance, suspension, brakes, and fuel capacity.

Which BYD G6 version should you buy?

Choose 1.5 MT for highway economy and manual control. It matches 1.5 DSG with 152 hp, 240 Nm, a 9.7-second 0–100 km/h time, a 200 km/h top speed, and 6.7 l/100 km combined consumption. Its principal numerical advantage is 5.4 l/100 km highway consumption, the lowest of the three versions.

Choose 1.5 DSG for urban consumption and the Robotic gearbox. Its 8.7 l/100 km city figure leads the range, while its acceleration and maximum speed remain identical to 1.5 MT. Compared with 1.5 MT, it saves 0.2 l/100 km in the city but uses 1.1 l/100 km more on the highway. The choice between these two is therefore mainly about gearbox type and where the car will be driven.

Choose 2.0 MT only if its particular naturally aspirated, 5-speed Manual configuration is the priority. On the measured figures, it does not gain performance or economy from its additional 494 cc: it has 12 hp less power, 54 Nm less torque, takes 2.8 seconds longer to reach 100 km/h, has a 15 km/h lower top speed, and consumes 1.6 l/100 km more combined than either turbo version.

The specifications point to 1.5 MT as the most compelling all-round selection for a buyer who wants a Manual gearbox, and to 1.5 DSG for a buyer who prefers a Robotic gearbox or prioritizes the lowest city consumption. No BYD G6 price is measured, so it is not possible to calculate what any extra purchase cost buys or to name the best-value version by price.