BAIC BJ212: Which Version to Buy and Why

The BAIC BJ212 catalogue contains one generation and one version, so choosing between engines, gearboxes, body styles, or generations is not possible from the available data. The sole listed choice is the 2.5 MT, produced from 1964 to 1987 as an SUV cabriolet. It combines a 2,450 cc Gasoline engine producing 75 hp and 167 Nm with a 3-speed Manual gearbox and AWD.

The BAIC BJ212 catalogue contains one generation and one version, so choosing between engines, gearboxes, body styles, or generations is not possible from the available data. The sole listed choice is the 2.5 MT, produced from 1964 to 1987 as an SUV cabriolet. It combines a 2,450 cc Gasoline engine producing 75 hp and 167 Nm with a 3-speed Manual gearbox and AWD. For a buyer comparing catalogue specifications, the decision is therefore straightforward: the 2.5 MT is the only data-backed BJ212 configuration, while price and newer BJ212 derivatives cannot be assessed because those details are not provided.

BAIC BJ212 generations: what changed?

The BJ212 has one recorded generation. The 1 generation ran from 1964 to 1987 and used an SUV cabriolet body. It contains one listed version, the 2.5 MT. No separate restyling, successor generation, or alternative body is included in the data, so there are no generation-to-generation changes to compare.

Searches for BAIC Beijing BJ212 variants may surface other names, but this catalogue entry supports only the 1964–1987 1 generation and its 2.5 MT version. Likewise, price and sale comparisons cannot be made from these specifications because no pricing or market-offer data is available.

BAIC BJ212 engine and specs comparison

VersionPowerTorqueDisplacementFuelCylindersLayoutBoostGearboxDrive
2.5 MT75 hp (55 kW) at 4000 rpm167 Nm at 2200 rpm2,450 ccGasoline, 804InlineNo3-speed ManualAWD

The 2.5 MT has a front, longitudinal engine with a Carburetor. Its 4 Inline cylinders use 2 valves per cylinder, while the bore and stroke are both 92 mm. The compression ratio is 6.7, and no boost is fitted.

Calculated from the supplied displacement and output, the 2.5 MT produces approximately 30.6 hp per litre. Torque density is approximately 68.2 Nm per litre. Because there is only one engine, these figures describe the sole available choice rather than an advantage over another BJ212 version.

The engine reaches its maximum 167 Nm at 2200 rpm, while maximum power of 75 hp arrives at 4000 rpm. The difference between those stated engine speeds is 1800 rpm. These figures identify where the listed output peaks, but they do not establish acceleration, flexibility, or towing performance because corresponding measurements are not provided.

BAIC BJ212 performance, MPG, and economy

For the 2.5 MT, acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h is not measured. Top speed is not measured. City fuel consumption is not measured, highway fuel consumption is not measured, and combined fuel consumption is not measured. Consequently, an MPG figure cannot be calculated from the data.

Fuel-tank capacity is not measured, CO₂ emissions are not measured, and the ecological class is not measured. The available engine data confirms Gasoline fuel and the fuel label 80, but it does not support a range or running-cost calculation.

These omissions matter when deciding whether to buy the 2.5 MT: the catalogue allows comparison of its mechanical specification, power density, and weight-to-power ratio, but not its acceleration, maximum speed, fuel economy, emissions, or driving range.

BAIC BJ212 dimensions and weight

The 2.5 MT has a kerb weight of 1,520 kg and a gross weight of 2,750 kg. The arithmetic difference between gross and kerb weight is 1,230 kg. This difference is not itself a stated payload rating; it is simply the result of subtracting the two supplied weight figures.

Ground clearance is 205 mm. Overall length, width, height, and wheelbase are not measured in the available data. Wheel sizes are not measured, and fuel-tank capacity is not measured.

Using the supplied kerb weight and power output, the 2.5 MT carries approximately 20.3 kg per horsepower. The inverse calculation gives approximately 49.3 hp per tonne at kerb weight. At gross weight, the corresponding figures are approximately 36.7 kg per horsepower and 27.3 hp per tonne. These calculated ratios provide useful context, but there is no second BJ212 version against which to rank them.

The chassis specification includes Independent, leaf spring front suspension and Dependent, leaf spring rear suspension. Front and rear brakes are both Drum. No wheel or tyre dimensions are available to extend the comparison.

BAIC BJ212 reliability and problems

No reliability record or problem data is supplied for the BAIC BJ212 2.5 MT. Failure rates, maintenance intervals, parts prices, service costs, and recurring faults are therefore not measured and should not be inferred from the engine, suspension, or brake specifications.

The catalogue confirms a Carburetor fuel system, No boost, a 3-speed Manual gearbox, AWD, leaf-spring suspension, and Drum brakes. These are configuration facts only; they do not prove that the version is more or less reliable than another vehicle.

Which BAIC BJ212 version should you buy?

Within this catalogue, the 2.5 MT is the only possible selection. It is the version to choose if the required specification is the recorded combination of an SUV cabriolet body, AWD, a 3-speed Manual gearbox, and a 2,450 cc Gasoline engine with 75 hp and 167 Nm.

There is no higher-output engine, Automatic gearbox, alternative drive system, or later generation in the supplied data. As a result, extra money cannot be matched to extra power, torque, equipment, or performance: neither alternative versions nor prices are provided. The measurable case for the 2.5 MT is limited to its 30.6 hp per litre, 68.2 Nm per litre, 20.3 kg per horsepower at kerb weight, and 205 mm ground clearance.

Buyers who require a choice based on acceleration, top speed, MPG, tank capacity, wheel sizes, reliability, or market price cannot identify a superior BJ212 version from this entry because each relevant comparison is either not measured or has no alternative version. On the available evidence, the answer is precise but narrow: choose the 2.5 MT for its stated mechanical package, not because it defeats another BJ212 configuration in a comparison the data does not contain.