Which Acura NSX Version Should You Buy?

The Acura NSX choice divides into two distinct groups. The first generation and its restyling offer naturally aspirated Gasoline versions with RWD and either Manual or Automatic gearboxes, while the second generation uses a more powerful Hybrid system, a Turbo engine, a 9-speed Robotic gearbox, and AWD.

The Acura NSX choice divides into two distinct groups. The first generation and its restyling offer naturally aspirated Gasoline versions with RWD and either Manual or Automatic gearboxes, while the second generation uses a more powerful Hybrid system, a Turbo engine, a 9-speed Robotic gearbox, and AWD. For maximum performance, the second-generation 3.5 DSG with 600 hp is the clear choice: it reaches 100 km/h in 3.0 seconds and has a 307 km/h top speed. Among the earlier cars, the restyled 3.2 MT with 294 hp provides the quickest listed acceleration at 4.8 seconds. Buyers prioritizing the lightest specification should consider the first-generation 3.0 MT at 1,370 kg, while those wanting an Automatic have 256 hp 3.0 AT versions from both the original and restyled ranges.

Acura NSX generations: what changed?

The first-generation Acura NSX was produced from 1990 to 2005 as a Coupe with three listed versions. Its range comprises the 274 hp 3.0 MT, the 280 hp 3.2 MT, and the 256 hp 3.0 AT. Every version is Gasoline-powered and uses RWD. The two Manual alternatives have 5 and 6 gears respectively, whereas the Automatic has 4 gears.

The first-generation restyling ran from 2002 to 2005 and remained a Coupe with three listed versions. It includes a 256 hp 3.0 AT plus two distinct 3.2 MT versions, one producing 280 hp and the other 294 hp. All three retain Gasoline power and RWD. The principal buying distinction is therefore between the 4-speed Automatic and the two 6-speed Manual specifications.

The second-generation Acura NSX has been listed from 2015 onward as a Coupe with two versions. Both are named 3.5 DSG, so they must be distinguished by output: one has 573 hp and 550 Nm, while the other has 600 hp and 667 Nm. Both combine Hybrid fuel type, Turbo boost, a 9-speed Robotic gearbox, and AWD. Compared with the 294 hp restyled 3.2 MT, the 600 hp 3.5 DSG adds 306 hp and reduces the listed 0–100 km/h time by 1.8 seconds.

Acura NSX engine specs and horsepower

Generation and versionPowerTorqueDisplacementFuelCylindersLayoutBoostGearboxDrive
First generation 3.0 MT274 hp284 Nm2,977 ccGasoline6V-shapedNo5-speed ManualRWD
First generation 3.2 MT280 hp298 Nm3,179 ccGasoline6V-shapedNo6-speed ManualRWD
First generation 3.0 AT256 hp284 Nm2,977 ccGasoline6V-shapedNo4-speed AutomaticRWD
First-generation restyling 3.0 AT256 hp284 Nm2,977 ccGasoline6V-shapedNo4-speed AutomaticRWD
First-generation restyling 3.2 MT, 280 hp280 hp298 Nm3,179 ccGasoline6V-shapedNo6-speed ManualRWD
First-generation restyling 3.2 MT, 294 hp294 hp303 Nm3,179 ccGasoline6V-shapedNo6-speed ManualRWD
Second generation 3.5 DSG, 573 hp573 hp550 Nm3,493 ccHybrid6V-shapedTurbo9-speed RoboticAWD
Second generation 3.5 DSG, 600 hp600 hp667 Nm3,493 ccHybrid6V-shapedTurbo9-speed RoboticAWD

Power per litre clarifies the scale of the second-generation change. The first-generation 3.0 MT produces approximately 92.0 hp per litre, while the first-generation 3.0 AT and restyled 3.0 AT each produce approximately 86.0 hp per litre. The 280 hp 3.2 MT versions deliver approximately 88.1 hp per litre, and the restyled 294 hp 3.2 MT raises that to approximately 92.5 hp per litre. The second-generation 573 hp and 600 hp 3.5 DSG versions reach approximately 164.0 and 171.8 hp per litre respectively.

The 600 hp 3.5 DSG does more than add 27 hp over the 573 hp version. Its torque rises from 550 to 667 Nm, a difference of 117 Nm, while displacement, cylinder count, V-shaped layout, Turbo specification, 9-speed Robotic gearbox, and AWD remain the same. On the supplied figures, this is the stronger second-generation choice for both output and acceleration.

Acura NSX performance and fuel economy

Generation and version0–100 km/hTop speedCity consumptionHighway consumptionCombined consumption
First generation 3.0 MT5.9 s270 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
First generation 3.2 MT5.9 s270 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
First generation 3.0 AT6.9 s260 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
First-generation restyling 3.0 AT7.5 s260 km/h17.1 L/100 km8.7 L/100 km11.8 L/100 km
First-generation restyling 3.2 MT, 280 hp5.9 s270 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
First-generation restyling 3.2 MT, 294 hp4.8 s265 km/hnot measurednot measurednot measured
Second generation 3.5 DSG, 573 hp3.8 s306 km/h11.8 L/100 km10.7 L/100 km11.2 L/100 km
Second generation 3.5 DSG, 600 hp3.0 s307 km/h11.2 L/100 kmnot measurednot measured

Among the original first-generation versions, both Manual choices reach 100 km/h in 5.9 seconds and have a 270 km/h top speed. The 3.2 MT therefore adds 6 hp and 14 Nm over the 3.0 MT without changing either listed performance result. The 3.0 AT takes 6.9 seconds and reaches 260 km/h, making it 1.0 second slower to 100 km/h and 10 km/h slower at the top end than either Manual version.

The restyled 294 hp 3.2 MT is the performance pick among the earlier cars. It accelerates to 100 km/h 1.1 seconds faster than the 280 hp 3.2 MT, although its listed top speed is 5 km/h lower. The restyled 3.0 AT is the slowest listed NSX at 7.5 seconds, while its 260 km/h maximum matches the original 3.0 AT.

The second-generation comparison favors the 600 hp 3.5 DSG. Its 3.0-second result is 0.8 seconds quicker than the 573 hp 3.5 DSG, and its top speed is 1 km/h higher. City consumption is also listed at 11.2 L/100 km rather than 11.8 L/100 km. Highway and combined consumption for the 600 hp version are not measured, so a complete economy comparison is not available.

Acura NSX dimensions, weight, clearance, tank, and wheels

Generation and versionKerb weightGross weightGround clearanceTankWheel sizes
First generation 3.0 MT1,370 kg1,610 kg120 mm70 L215/45 R16; 245/40 R17
First generation 3.2 MT1,445 kg1,610 kg120 mm70 L215/45 R16; 245/40 R17
First generation 3.0 AT1,430 kg1,610 kg120 mm70 L215/45 R16; 245/40 R17
First-generation restyling 3.0 AT1,430 kg1,610 kg120 mm70 L215/40 R17; 255/40 R17
First-generation restyling 3.2 MT, 280 hp1,445 kg1,610 kg120 mm70 L215/45 R16; 245/40 R17
First-generation restyling 3.2 MT, 294 hp1,470 kg1,610 kg120 mm70 L215/45 R16; 245/40 R17
Second generation 3.5 DSG, 573 hp1,725 kgnot measured94 mm59 L245/35 R19; 305/30 R20
Second generation 3.5 DSG, 600 hpnot measurednot measured94 mm59 L245/35 R19; 305/30 R20

The first-generation 3.0 MT has the best known weight-to-power ratio among the original three versions at exactly 5.0 kg per hp. The first-generation 3.2 MT is approximately 5.16 kg per hp, while the first-generation 3.0 AT is approximately 5.59 kg per hp. Within the restyled range, the 294 hp 3.2 MT is approximately 5.0 kg per hp, ahead of the 280 hp 3.2 MT at approximately 5.16 kg per hp and the 3.0 AT at approximately 5.59 kg per hp.

The known 1,725 kg kerb weight of the 573 hp 3.5 DSG gives approximately 3.01 kg per hp. Its kerb weight is 355 kg above the original 3.0 MT, but it supplies 299 hp more. A weight-to-power figure cannot be calculated for the 600 hp 3.5 DSG because its kerb weight is not measured.

Every listed first-generation version has 120 mm of ground clearance and a 70 L tank. Both second-generation 3.5 DSG versions have 94 mm of clearance and a 59 L tank, differences of 26 mm and 11 L respectively. The second generation also uses 245/35 R19 and 305/30 R20 wheels, while the earlier specifications use the wheel sizes shown in the table.

Which Acura NSX version should you choose?

Choose the first-generation 3.0 MT if low kerb weight and a Manual gearbox matter most. It is the lightest listed version at 1,370 kg, produces 274 hp, reaches 100 km/h in 5.9 seconds, and has a 270 km/h top speed. Its 5-speed Manual distinguishes it from the 6-speed 3.2 MT.

Choose the first-generation or restyled 3.0 AT if Automatic operation is essential. Both versions have 256 hp, 284 Nm, a 4-speed Automatic gearbox, and RWD. The original car records 0–100 km/h in 6.9 seconds, compared with 7.5 seconds for the restyled version. Only the restyled 3.0 AT has measured consumption here: 17.1 L/100 km in the city, 8.7 L/100 km on the highway, and 11.8 L/100 km combined.

Choose the restyled 3.2 MT with 294 hp for the strongest earlier-generation acceleration. It adds 14 hp and 5 Nm over the 280 hp restyled 3.2 MT and cuts the 0–100 km/h time from 5.9 to 4.8 seconds. Its kerb weight is 25 kg higher, and its top speed is 265 rather than 270 km/h.

Choose the second-generation 3.5 DSG with 573 hp if you want Hybrid power, Turbo boost, AWD, and the 9-speed Robotic gearbox while retaining a measured kerb weight and a complete set of consumption figures. It produces 550 Nm, accelerates to 100 km/h in 3.8 seconds, reaches 306 km/h, and records 11.2 L/100 km combined.

Choose the second-generation 3.5 DSG with 600 hp when outright performance leads the decision. Compared with the 573 hp version, it adds 27 hp and 117 Nm, reaches 100 km/h 0.8 seconds sooner, and raises top speed by 1 km/h. Its kerb weight, gross weight, highway consumption, and combined consumption are not measured, so those missing figures cannot support a broader ownership comparison. Price and for-sale information are also unavailable in the supplied data, so the decision can only be made from the specifications above.